Journals / İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 29

The Functioning of the Socialist Economy: Strategies for Growth and Stability

Sosyalist Ekonominin İşleyişi: Büyüme ve İstikrar Stratejileri

Meltem Ince Yenilmez(IZMIR DEMOCRACY UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4689-3196
Pages
702–723
Publication Date
2026-07-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed policy framework demonstrates that balancing pricing, monetary, and exchange-rate policies is essential for achieving long-term economic sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines how price controls, central banking, exchange rate management, and monetary policy were used in centrally planned socialist economies to achieve the state-defined objectives of equality, stability, and economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It comparatively analyzes the experiences of the Soviet Union (1917–1991), China (1950–1991), Cuba, and North Korea, focusing on the interaction of pricing policies, monetary policy, and exchange rate management and their effects on economic performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed policy framework demonstrates that balancing pricing, monetary, and exchange-rate policies is essential for achieving long-term economic sustainability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Merkezi planlı sosyalist ekonomiler · fiyat kontrolleri ve para politikası · döviz kuru yönetimi

Abstract

This article examines how price controls, central banking, exchange rate management, and monetary policy were used in centrally planned socialist economies to achieve the state-defined objectives of equality, stability, and economic growth. The study employs a theoretical and comparative research design based on an extensive review of the literature. It comparatively analyzes the experiences of the Soviet Union (1917–1991), China (1950–1991), Cuba, and North Korea, focusing on the interaction of pricing policies, monetary policy, and exchange rate management and their effects on economic performance. The analysis shows that although these policy instruments were effective in supporting distributive objectives and macroeconomic stability, their long-term interaction generated chronic shortages, monetary overhang, exchange-rate distortions, and the expansion of black markets. In particular, persistent price controls combined with excess liquidity weakened resource allocation and reduced economic efficiency, highlighting the structural trade-offs among equity, stability, and efficiency. The findings suggest that centrally planned socialist economies require selective market-oriented reforms that improve flexibility and efficiency while preserving their core social objectives. The proposed policy framework demonstrates that balancing pricing, monetary, and exchange-rate policies is essential for achieving long-term economic sustainability.

Özet

Bu makale, merkezi planlı sosyalist ekonomilerde fiyat kontrolleri, merkez bankacılığı, döviz kuru yönetimi ve para politikası araçlarının, devlet tarafından belirlenen eşitlik, istikrar ve ekonomik büyüme hedeflerine ulaşmak amacıyla nasıl kullanıldığını incelemektedir. Çalışma, kapsamlı bir literatür taramasına dayanan teorik ve karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma tasarımı benimsemektedir. Bu kapsamda Sovyetler Birliği (1917–1991), Çin (1950–1991), Küba ve Kuzey Kore deneyimleri karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmekte; fiyat politikaları, para politikası ve döviz kuru yönetimi arasındaki etkileşim ile bunların ekonomik performans üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmektedir. Analiz bulguları, söz konusu politika araçlarının bölüşüm hedeflerini ve makroekonomik istikrarı desteklemede etkili olmakla birlikte, uzun vadede kronik kıtlıklar, parasal fazlalık, döviz kuru çarpıklıkları ve karaborsanın genişlemesi gibi yapısal sorunlara yol açtığını göstermektedir. Özellikle, kalıcı fiyat kontrollerinin aşırı likidite ile birleşmesi, kaynak tahsisinin etkinliğini zayıflatmış ve ekonomik verimliliği azaltarak eşitlik, istikrar ve etkinlik arasındaki yapısal ödünleşimleri belirgin hâle getirmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, merkezi planlı sosyalist ekonomilerin temel sosyal hedeflerini korurken esnekliği ve etkinliği artıracak seçici piyasa odaklı reformlara ihtiyaç duyduğunu göstermektedir. Önerilen politika çerçevesi, uzun dönemli ekonomik sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanabilmesi için fiyatlandırma, para politikası ve döviz kuru politikaları arasında dengeli bir yapının kurulmasının kritik önem taşıdığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yenilmez, M. I. (2026). The Functioning of the Socialist Economy: Strategies for Growth and Stability. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Sayı: 29, 702–723. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1787596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. Ahmed, Y. N., Alnafissa, M., Negm, M. M., Gharieb, Y. M., Algarini, A., & Hassouba, T. A. A. (2024). Analyzing exchange rate effects on trade: Empirical evidence. Sustainability, 16(10), Article 4177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104177
  2. Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
  3. Bacchetta, P., & van Wincoop, E. (2000). Does exchange-rate stability increase trade and welfare?. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1093-1109. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1093
  4. Balasoiu, N., Chifu, I., & Oancea, M. (2023). Impact of direct taxation on economic growth: Empirical evidence based on panel data regression analysis at the level of EU countries. Sustainability, 15(9), Article 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097146
  5. Ben-Nasr, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.007
  6. Bergh, A., Bjørnskov, C., & Kouba, L. (2025). The growth consequences of socialism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 53(2), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2025.04.003
  7. Boettke, P. J., Candela, R. A., & Truitt, T. L. (2024). The socialist calculation debate: Theory, history, and contemporary relevance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009593649
  8. Buchanan, J.M. & Tullock, G. (1962) The calculus of consent: Logical foundations for constitutional democracy. The University of Michigan Press. http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1063
  9. Carrière-Swallow, Y., Magud, N. E., & Yépez, J. F. (2018). No pain, all gain? Exchange rate flexibility and the expenditure-switching effect. IMF Working Papers, 2018(213). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484378236.001
  10. Chepurenko, A., & Szanyi, M. (2021). Parallel processes and divergent outcomes: The transformation of the economies of former socialist countries. IOS Working Papers No. 393. Leibniz-Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/243220
  11. Chikozho, C., & Mapedza, E. (2017). Free-market economics and developmental statism as political paradigms: Implications for water governance theory and practice in developing countries. In E. Karar (Ed.), Freshwater governance for the 21st century (pp. 45-68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43350-9_4
  12. Chivvis, C. S. (2024). U.S.-China relations for the 2030s: Toward a realistic scenario for coexistence. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://tinyurl.com/dn2u3pzm
  13. Clarke, S. (2001). Class struggle and global overaccumulation. In: R. Albritton, M. Itoh, R. Westra, & A. Zuege (Eds.), Phases of capitalist development (pp. 76–92). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403900081_5
  14. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
  15. Coombs, N., & Thiemann, M. (2022). Recentering central banks: Theorising state-economy boundaries as central bank effects. Economy and Society, 51(4), 535–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2022.2118450
  16. Corden, W. M. (1994). Economic policy, exchange rates and the international system. University of Chicago Press.
  17. Da Costa, J. C. R. (2022). Re: What is wealth inequality?. Studies in Social Justice, 16(3), 649–651. https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V16I3.4016
  18. Dabrowski, M. (2023). Thirty years of economic transition in the former Soviet Union: Microeconomic and institutional dimensions. Russian Journal of Economics, 9(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.9.104761
  19. Dragoi, D. (2020). Economic growth versus economic development. Atlantic Review of Economics, 4(1), 1-11. https://www.aroec.org/ojs/index.php/ARoEc/article/view/100
  20. Durand, C., Hofferberth, E., & Schmelzer, M. (2024). Planning beyond growth: The case for economic democracy within ecological limits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, Article 140351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140351
  21. Economics in Context Initiative. (2021). Comparative economic systems: Capitalism and socialism in the 21st century. Global Development Policy Centre, Boston University. https://www.bu.edu/eci/2024/08/23/comparative-economic-systems/
  22. Edwards, S. (2020). Milton Friedman and exchange rates in developing countries. NBER Working Paper No. 27975. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27975
  23. El Khoury, S. (2026, February 25). The Chinese yuan continues to rise against the US dollar to its highest level since 2023, supported by economic and financial factors. Trade Taurex. https://www.tradetaurex.com/news/the-chinese-yuan-continues-to-rise-against-the-us-dollar-to-its-highest-level-since-2023-supported-by-economic-and-financial-factors/
  24. Ellman, M. (2014). Socialist Planning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press. https://tinyurl.com/mt4udw9c
  25. European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 21 final. Sustainable Europe Investment Plan. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0021
  26. Graafland, J., & Verbruggen, H. (2022). Free-market, perfect market and welfare state perspectives on "good" markets: An empirical test. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 1113–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09946-2
  27. Guénette, J. D. (2020). Price controls: Good intentions, bad outcomes. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 9212. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9212
  28. Hacking, N., & Flynn, A. (2017). Networks, power and knowledge in the planning system: A case study of energy from waste. Progress in Planning, 113, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2015.12.001
  29. Halkos, G., & Paizanos, E. (2015). Fiscal policy and economic performance: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature (MPRA Paper No. 67737). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/67737/
  30. Hanson, K., Brikci, N., Erlangga, D., Alebachew, A., De Allegri, M., Balabanova, D., Blecher, M., Cashin, C., Esperato, A., Hipgrave, D., Kalisa, I., Kurowski, C., Meng, Q., Morgan, D., Mtei, G., Nolte, E., Onoka, C., Powell-Jackson, T., Roland, M., Sadanandan, R., Wurie, H. (2022). The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: Putting people at the centre. The Lancet Global Health, 10(5), e715–e772. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00005-5
  31. Hardy, B., Hill, H. D., & Romich, J. (2019). Strengthening social programs to promote economic stability during childhood. Social Policy Report, 32(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.4
  32. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809376
  33. Hickel, J. (2023). On technology and degrowth. Monthly Review, 75(3), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-075-03-2023-07_3
  34. Islam, S., Amin, A., Hossain, B., Imran, A., Jahan, N., Asad, F., & Mamun, A. (2024). The role of fiscal policy in economic growth: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(12), 1361-1371. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120115
  35. Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change. Economy and Society, 24(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000013
  36. Jessop, B., & Sum, N. L. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845428907
  37. Kampourakis, I. (2023). The market as an instrument of planning in sustainability capitalism. European Law Open, 2(3), 511–542. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.56
  38. Kayani, U. N., Aysan, A. F., Gul, A., Haider, S. A., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Unpacking the asymmetric impact of exchange rate volatility on trade flows: A study of selected developed and developing Asian economies. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0291261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291261
  39. Kornai, J. (1986). The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb01252.x
  40. Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist system: The political economy of communism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddczdr
  41. Kugler, A. D. (2024). Central Bank independence and the conduct of monetary policy [Conference presentation]. 2024 Annual Meeting of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association and the Latin American and Caribbean Chapter of the Econometric Society, Montevideo, Uruguay. https://www.bis.org/review/r241125b.pdf
  42. Lange, O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967660
  43. Lessmann, O., & Bartelheimer, P. (2015, July). Inequality of what? Socioeconomic reporting and capability, participation and precariousness [Conference presentation]. SASE 27th Annual Conference on "Inequality in the 21st Century", London, UK.
  44. Malicse, A. (2025). The profit motive: A reality or an illusion of capitalism?. PhilArchive. https://philarchive.org/rec/MALTPM-2
  45. Mehtiyev, J., Magda, R., & Vasa, L. (2021). Exchange rate impacts on international trade. Economic Annals-XXI, 190(5-6-2), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V190-02
  46. Mesa-Lago, C., & Vidal-Alejandro, P. (2010). The impact of the global crisis on Cuba’s economy and social welfare. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(4), 689–717. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40984955
  47. Morozov, E. (2019). Digital socialism? The calculation debate in the age of big data. New Left Review, 116/117, 33-67. https://doi.org/10.64590/tt3
  48. Mukhtarov, S., Humbatova, S., Mammadli, M., & Hajiyev, N. G. O. (2021). The impact of oil price shocks on national income: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Energies, 14(6), Article 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061695
  49. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
  50. Nove, A. (1987). The Soviet economic system (3rd ed.). Unwin Hyman. Ocampo, J. A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.). (2008). Capital market liberalisation and development. Oxford University Press.
  51. O'Neill, M. (2020). Social justice and economic systems: On Rawls, democratic socialism, and alternatives to capitalism. Philosophical Topics, 48(2), 159–202. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics202048219
  52. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  53. Pateman, C. (1970). Rousseau, John Stuart Mill and G. D. H. Cole: A participatory theory of democracy. In: Participation and Democratic Theory (pp. 22-44). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720444.002
  54. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. Macmillan.
  55. Poghosyan, T. (2025). Interactions between public and private sector wages and inflation in Mongolia. IMF Working Paper No. WP/25/53. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229001267.001
  56. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Rinehart.
  57. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v
  58. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  59. Rector, T. (2021). Market socialism as a form of life. Review of Social Economy, 79(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1886319
  60. Riedel, J., & Turley, W. S. (1999). The politics and economics of transition to an open market economy in Vietnam. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 152. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/634117557525
  61. Roberts, A., Moraes, H. C., & Ferguson, V. (2019). Toward a geoeconomic order in international trade and investment. Journal of International Economic Law, 22(4), 655-676. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz036
  62. Roberts, J. M., & Ibrahim, J. (2022). Open Marxism, social class, and social and political movements. Capital & Class, 47(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168221136999
  63. Salomon, M. E. (2023). Emancipating human rights: Capitalism and the common good. Leiden Journal of International Law, 36(4), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000316
  64. Schlichter, L. (2024). Planning for degrowth: How artificial intelligence and big data revitalise the debate on democratic economic planning. IPE Working Paper No. 231/2024. Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin, Institute for International Political Economy. https://www.ipe-berlin.org/en/publications/working-papers
  65. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
  66. Shragge, E., & Fontan, J. M. (2000). Tendencies, tensions and visions in the social economy. In: E. Shragge & J.-M. Fontan (Eds.), Social economy: International debates and perspectives (pp. 1-15). Black Rose Books.
  67. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the public sector (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
  68. Sullivan, D., & Hickel, J. (2023). Capitalism and extreme poverty: A global analysis of real wages, human height, and mortality since the long 16th century. World Development, 161, Article 106026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106026
  69. Tanzi, V. (2000). The role of the state and the quality of the public sector. IMF Working Papers, 2000(036). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451845440.001
  70. UA News. (2026, May 11). North Korea has earned billions in revenue for supporting Russia in the war against Ukraine. UA News. https://ua.news/en/world/kndr-otrimala-miliardni-dokhodi-za-pidtrimku-rf-u-viini-proti-ukrayini
  71. von Mises, L. (1935). Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. In: F. A. Hayek (Ed.), Collectivist economic planning (pp. 87–130). Routledge. https://mises.org/library/book/collectivist-economic-planning
  72. Walker, C. C., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2021). Welfare systems without economic growth: A review of the challenges and next steps for the field. Ecological Economics, 186, Article 107066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107066
  73. Warjiyo, P., Juhro, S.M. (2022). Correction to: Central Bank policy mix: Issues, challenges, and policy responses. In: P. Warjiyo & Juhro, S. M. (eds), Central bank policy mix: Issues, challenges, and policy responses. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6827-2_14
  74. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
  75. West, D. K. (2020). Cybernetics for the command economy: Foregrounding entropy in late Soviet planning. History of the Human Sciences, 33(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119886520