Journals / ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Biochemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata Ledeb. Fruits Collected from Kahramanmaraş

Kahramanmaraş’tan Toplanan Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata Ledeb. Meyvelerinin Biyokimyasal Özellikleri ve Antimikrobiyal Aktivitelerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
46–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, inhibition effect on bacteria was higher than fungi.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata is a plant that is believed to have medicinal benefits and is used for this purpose as well as consumed by the local people as food.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, fatty acids were analyzed by GC-MS analysis and 25 different fatty acids were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, inhibition effect on bacteria was higher than fungi.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata is a plant that is believed to have medicinal benefits and is used for this purpose as well as consumed by the local people as food. Despite its economic potential wild P. divaricata subsp. divaricata has still not domesticated and the fruits consumption has not became prevalent. In this study, total phenolic and flavonoid content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of extracts obtained from two different extractors (soxhlete and ultrasonic bath) from P. divaricata subsp. divaricata fruits collected from two different locations (Ahırdağı and Nurhak) in Kahramanmaraş were investigated. In addition, fatty acids were analyzed by GC-MS analysis and 25 different fatty acids were determined. The main fatty acid components of P. divaricata subsp. divaricata fruit extracts collected from the Ahırdağı location include cis-11,14,17- eicosatrienoic acid (31.20%) and oleic acid (25.41%); in plants from Nurhak location, oleic acid (49.77%) and palmitic acid (23.05%). The ultrasonic bath was found to be more effective in detecting the bioactive contents of the extracts than the soxhlete. Total phenolic content of plant extracts (USB) in Ahırdağı and Nurhak locations were 62.50 and 37.40 mg g-1, total flavonoid amount was 2.96 and 1.81 mg g-1, FRAP value was 31.05 and 20.82 μg g-1 and DPPH were 1.47 and 1.65 mg g-1. Antimicrobial activity experiment carried with a total of 10 microorganisms (eight bacteria and two yeasts) showed that P. divaricata subsp. divaricata fruit extracts inhibited all of the microorganisms growth tested. However, inhibition effect on bacteria was higher than fungi.

Özet

Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata Ledeb. (yonuz eriği), tıbbi amaçlı kullanımının yanı sıra, yöre halkı tarafından gıda olarak da tüketilen bir türdür. Ekonomik potansiyeli olmasına rağmen, yabani P. divaricata subsp. divaricata kültüre alınmamış ve meyve tüketimi yaygınlaşmamıştır. Bu çalışmada, Kahramanmaraş’ta Ahırdağı ve Nurhak lokasyonlarından toplanan P. divaricata subsp. divaricata meyve örneklerden iki farklı ekstraktörle (soksalet ve ultrasonik banyo) elde edilen ekstraktların, toplam fenolik ve flavonoid içerikleri ile antioksidan, antimikrobiyal aktiviteleri ve ayrıca GCMS analizi ile analiz edildi ve 25 farklı yağ asidi belirlenmiştir. Ahırdağı lokasyonundan toplanan P. divaricata subsp. divaricata meyve ekstraktlarının başlıca yağ asidi bileşenlerini cis-11,14,17- eikosatrienoik asit (%31,20) ve oleik asit (%25,41); Nurhak lokasyonundaki bitkilerde ise oleik asit (%49,77) ve palmitik asit (%23,054) oluşturmaktadır. Ekstraktların biyoaktif içeriklerinin belirlenmesinde ultrasonik banyonun soksalete göre daha etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Ahırdağı ve Nurhak lokasyonundaki örneklerin USB metoduna göre sırasıyla toplam fenolik madde içeriği 62,50 ve 37,40 mg g-1, toplam flavonoid miktarı 2,96 ve 1,81 mg g-1, FRAP değeri 31,05. ve 20,82 μg g-1 ve DPPH değeri 1,47 ve 1,65 mg g-1 olarak bulunmuştur. Antimikrobiyal aktivite deneyi sonucunda, P. divaricata subsp. divaricata meyve ekstraktları çalışılan 10 mikroorganizmanın tamamının (8 bakteri ve 2 mantar) gelişimini durdurmuştur. Ancak bakteriler üzerindeki inhibisyon etkisi funguslardan daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇÖMLEKCİOĞLU, N., KOCABAŞ, Y. Z., AYGAN, A. (2020). Determination of Biochemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Prunus divaricata subsp. divaricata Ledeb. Fruits Collected from Kahramanmaraş. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 46–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/141415

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonymous. 1993. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Suspectibility Tests. Approved Standard. NCCLS Publication M2-A5, Villanova, PA, USA, 1993.
  2. Ballistreri, G., A. Continella, A. Gentile, M. Amenta, S. Fabroni, and P. Rapisarda. 2013. Fruit quality and bioactive compounds relevant to human health of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Italy. Food Chem. 140 (4): 630-638.
  3. Benzie, I. F., and J. J. Strain. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 239 (1): 70- 76. Blackhall, M. L., R. Berry, N. W. Davies, and J. T. Walls. 2018. Optimized extraction of anthocyanins from Reid Fruits’ Prunus avium ‘Lapins’ cherries. Food Chem. 256: 280-285.
  4. Brand-Williams, W., M. E. Cuvelier, and C. L. W. T. Berset. 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 28 (1): 25-30.
  5. Cantin, C. M., M. A. Moreno, and Y. Gogorcena. 2009. Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, and vitamin C content of different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (11): 4586-4592.
  6. Chang, C. C., M. H. Yang, H. M. Wen, and J. C. Chern. 2002. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J. Food Drug Anal. 10 (3): 178-182.
  7. Collins, C. H., P. M. Lyne, and J. M. Grange. 1989. Collins and Lyne’s Microbiological Methods. Sixth Edition,
  8. Butterworths Co. Ltd. London. Davis, P. H. (Ed.) 1965-1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 1-9. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  9. Dönmez, A. A., and Ş. Yıldırımlı. 2000. Taxonomy of the genus Prunus L. (Rosaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 24 (3): 187-202.
  10. Ekor, M. 2014. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Frontiers in pharmacology 4: 177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00177.
  11. Faydaoğlu, E. ve M. S. Sürücüoğlu. 2011. Geçmişten günümüze tıbbi ve aromatik bitkilerin kullanılması ve ekonomik önemi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (1): 52-67.
  12. Ferioli, F., E. Giambanelli, L. F. D'Antuono, H. S. Costa, T. G. Albuquerque, A. S. Silva, and B. Koçaoglu. 2013. Comparison of leafy kale populations from Italy, Portugal, and Turkey for their bioactive compound content: phenolics, glucosinolates, carotenoids, and chlorophylls. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93 (14): 3478-3489.
  13. Hagen, S. F., G. I. A. Borge, K. A. So