The questionnaire has been developed in two information categories as personal information and institutes and their virtual education applications.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research was conducted in order to make comparative analysis of virtual education applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of total 300 institutes providing virtual education in the fall, spring and summer semesters of 2004; 246 in USA, 10 in Australia, 3 in South Africa, 10 in India, 21 in UK, 6 in Japan, 4 in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The questionnaire has been developed in two information categories as personal information and institutes and their virtual education applications.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The research was conducted in order to make comparative analysis of virtual education applications. The research is conducted in survey model. The study group consists of total 300 institutes providing virtual education in the fall, spring and summer semesters of 2004; 246 in USA, 10 in Australia, 3 in South Africa, 10 in India, 21 in UK, 6 in Japan, 4 in Turkey. The information has been collected by online questionnaire sent to the target mass by e-mail. The questionnaire has been developed in two information categories as personal information and institutes and their virtual education applications.
🔖
Cite This Article
KURT, M. (2006). NOTE FOR EDITOR: Comparative Analysis of Virtual Education Applications. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 8–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/140300
KURT, Mehmet. (March 2006). Comparative Analysis Of Virtual Education Applications, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Educational Sciences Program of Curriculum and Instruction (Educational Technology), Adviser: Asst. Prof. Dr. Nurettin Şimşek, Ankara University, Turkey, 299+xvı page.