SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

The PIDA Controller Design Simulator

PIDA Denetleyici Tasarım Simülatörü

Fahri Vatansever(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0002-3885-8622
Metin Hatun(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0279-5508
Pages
840–850
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this software tool, PIDA controllers can be designed for user-defined systems and many numerical and graphical results can be obtained.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PIDA controllers are frequently used in industrial applications their design is very important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are different design methods/approaches for this purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this software tool, PIDA controllers can be designed for user-defined systems and many numerical and graphical results can be obtained.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:PIDA · Dorf Yaklaşımı · Kitti Yöntemi

Abstract

PIDA controllers are frequently used in industrial applications their design is very important. There are different design methods/approaches for this purpose. In this study, the most commonly used methods in the design of PIDA controllers, namely Dorf’s Approach, Kitti’s Method and Coefficient Diagram Method, are presented in detail and their closed form equations are given. In addition, a software tool with a user-friendly interface has been developed so that users can design PIDA controllers easily, quickly and effectively. With this software tool, PIDA controllers can be designed for user-defined systems and many numerical and graphical results can be obtained.

Özet

PIDA denetleyiciler endüstriyel uygulamalarda sıklıkla kullanılır ve tasarımları çok önemlidir. Bu amaçla farklı tasarım yöntemleri/yaklaşımları mevcuttur. Bu çalışmada, PIDA denetleyicilerin tasarımında en yaygın kullanılan yöntemler olan Dorf Yaklaşımı, Kitti Yöntemi ve Katsayı Diyagram Yöntemi ayrıntılı olarak sunulmuş ve kapalı form denklemleri verilmiştir. Ayrıca, kullanıcıların PIDA denetleyicileri kolayca, hızlı ve etkili bir şekilde tasarlayabilmeleri için kullanıcı dostu arayüze sahip bir yazılım aracı geliştirilmiştir. Bu yazılım aracı ile kullanıcı tanımlı sistemler için PIDA denetleyiciler tasarlanabilir ve birçok sayısal ve grafiksel sonuçlar elde edilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Vatansever, F., Hatun, M. (2026). The PIDA Controller Design Simulator. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 840–850. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1907759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. R.P. Borase, D.K. Maghade, S.Y. Sondkar, S.N. Pawar, A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 9 (2021) 818-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-020-00665-4
  2. R.S. Patil, S.P. Jadhav, M.D. Patil, Review of intelligent and nature-inspired algorithms-based methods for tuning PID controllers in industrial applications. Journal of Robotics and Control, 5:2 (2024) 336-358. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v5i2.20850
  3. S.B. Joseph, E.G. Dada, A. Abidemi, D.O. Oyewola, B.M. Khammas, Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: review, approaches and open problems. Heliyon, 8:5 (2022) e09399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09399
  4. F. Campregher, A. Visioli, Practical implementation of PIDA controllers. 2025 IEEE 30th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Porto, Portugal, September 09-12 (2025) pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA65518.2025.11205711
  5. M. Milanesi, A. Visioli, Y.Q. Chen, Performance comparison between PID, PIDD2 and PIDD2α. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58: 12 (2024) 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.178
  6. O. Garpinger, T. Hägglund, L. Cederqvist, Software for PID design: Benefits and pitfalls. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45: 3 (2012) 140-145. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00024
  7. R. Mazaeda, C. de Prada, IFTtune: a PID automatic tuning software tool. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45: 3 (2012) 619-624. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00105
  8. J. Oravec, M. Bakošová, PIDDESIGN-Software for PID control education. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45: 3 (2012) 691-696. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00117
  9. Y. Benavides, V.M. Alfaro, O. Arrieta, R. Vilanova, Interactive software tool for robust tuning of one- and two-degree-of-freedom PI and PID controllers. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46: 17 (2013) 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00004
  10. J.L. Guzmán, T. Hägglund, K.J. Åström, S. Dormido, M. Berenguel, Y. Piguet, Understanding PID design through interactive tools. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47: 3 (2014) 12243-12248. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01328
  11. J. Oravec, M. Kalúz, L. Čirka, M. Fikar, M. Bakošová, WebPIDDESIGN - software for PID controller design management. 2015 European Control Conference (ECC), Linz, Austria, July 15-17 (2015) pp. 3015-3020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECC.2015.7330996
  12. R. Sanchis, J.-A. Romero, A software tool for the design and simulation of PID with event based sampling. 2017 3rd International Conference on Event-Based Control, Communication and Signal Processing (EBCCSP), Funchal, Portugal, May 24-26 (2017) pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EBCCSP.2017.8022816
  13. J. Garrido, M.L. Ruz, F. Morilla, F. Vázquez, Interactive tool for frequency domain tuning of PID controllers. Processes, 6: 10 (2018) 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6100197
  14. P. Bisták, M. Huba, Interactive software tool for design of higher derivative degree PID controllers. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53: 2 (2020) 17198-17203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1736
  15. M. Ferrari, A. Visioli, A software tool to understand the design of PIDA controllers. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55: 17 (2022) 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.287
  16. K. Žáková, J. Matišák, J. Šefčík, Contribution to PID and PIDA interactive educational tools. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58: 7 (2024) 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.020
  17. M. Hatun, F. Vatansever, The PIDA controller analysis simulator. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 13: 2 (2025) 526-537. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1608341
  18. G. Goncagül, M. Hatun, F. Vatansever, The online PID/PIDA simulator. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 38:1 (2026) 245-254. https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.1797151
  19. S. Jung, R.C. Dorf, Analytic PIDA controller design technique for a third order system. Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, December 13 (1996) pp. 2513-2518. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1996.573472
  20. S. Jung, R.C. Dorf, Novel analytic technique for PID and PIDA controller design. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 29: 1 (1996) 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)57819-2
  21. N. Narkvitul, P. Ukakimaparn, P. Pannil, T. Trisuwannawat, Closed-form formulas for continuous/discrete-time PIDA controllers’ parameters. Proceedins of 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2015), Busan, South Korea, October 13-16 (2015) pp. 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364932
  22. T. Trisuwannawat, K. Tirasesth, J. Ngamwiwit, M. Iida, PID×(n-2) stage PD cascade controller for SISO systems. Proceedings of the 37th SICE Annual Conference. International Session Papers, Chiba, Japan, July 29-31 (1998) pp. 965-968. https://doi.org/10.1109/SICE.1998.742960
  23. P. Pannil, S. Kanchanasomranvong, T. Ukakimaparn, T. Trisuwannawat, K. Tirasesth, Discrete PID×(n-2) stage PD cascade controller for SISO systems. 2008 SICE Annual Conference, Chofu, Japan, August 20-22 (2008) pp. 1784-1787. https://doi.org/10.1109/SICE.2008.4654953
  24. A. Tongtanee, P. Pannil, P. Ukakimaparn, T. Trisuwannawat, Discrete-time PIDA controller designed by Kitti's method; a third generation. Proceedings of 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Kanazawa, Japan, September 19-22 (2017) pp. 1384-1388. https://doi.org/10.23919/SICE.2017.8105730
  25. S. Manabe, Coefficient diagram method. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31: 21 (1998) 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)41080-9
  26. P. Patu, N. Jongkol, T. Kitti, K. Noriyuki, M. Shunji, PIDA controller design by CDM. Proceedings of the 13th Korea Automatic Control Conference (KACC), Busan, Korea, October 15-17 (1998) pp. 395-400.
  27. The MathWorks Inc. (2022). MATLAB, App Designer.