SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2015 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 24

Which Group of Individuals are subjected to Get Long-Term Unemployed During and After a Recession? Evidence from Turkey

Hacı TAŞÇI
Ali ÖZDEMİR
Burak DARICI
Pages
143–162
Publication Date
2015-04-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that females are more likely to be long-term unemployed than males and this result hinders for “gender discrimination” against women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study tests the effects of individual characteristics on the incidence of being long-term unemployed in Turkey using data from Turkey’s Household Labor Force Surveys of 2010 and 2011 which are the first two following years of Global Economic Recession.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicate that females are more likely to be long-term unemployed than males and this result hinders for “gender discrimination” against women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results also indicate that increases in education as well as age increases the probability of being long-term unemployed and this indicates inadequacy of education and experience in Turkish labor market.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study tests the effects of individual characteristics on the incidence of being long-term unemployed in Turkey using data from Turkey’s Household Labor Force Surveys of 2010 and 2011 which are the first two following years of Global Economic Recession. The results indicate that females are more likely to be long-term unemployed than males and this result hinders for “gender discrimination” against women. The results also indicate that increases in education as well as age increases the probability of being long-term unemployed and this indicates inadequacy of education and experience in Turkish labor market.

Özet

This study tests the effects of individual characteristics on the incidence of being long-term unemployed in Turkey using data from Turkey’s Household Labor Force Surveys of 2010 and 2011 which are the first two following years of Global Economic Recession. The results indicate that females are more likely to be long-term unemployed than males and this result hinders for “gender discrimination” against women. The results also indicate that increases in education as well as age increases the probability of being long-term unemployed and this indicates inadequacy of education and experience in Turkish labor market.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞÇI, H., ÖZDEMİR, A., DARICI, B. (2015). Which Group of Individuals are subjected to Get Long-Term Unemployed During and After a Recession? Evidence from Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 24, 143–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/139807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acs, G. (2013),
  2. Responding to Long-Term Unemployment, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute,, 16.01.2015.
  3. Barnette, J. & A. Michaud (2012), “Wage Scars from Job Loss”, Working Paper, University of Akron,, 16.4.2015.
  4. Blanco, A. & S. de la Rica (2002), Unemployed Older Workers Versus Prime Age Workers Differences in Their Re-Employment Determinants in Spain,, 16.04.2015.
  5. Biçerli, M.K. & N. Gündoğan (2001), “Profiling and Identification of Long-Term Unemployment in Turkey”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 12(41), 51-76. Bildirici M. & Ö.Ö. Ersin & C. Türkmen & Y. Yalçınkaya (2012), “The Persistence Effect of Unemployment in Turkey: An Analysis of 1980-2010 Period”, Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 1(3). Borie-Holtz, D. & C. Van Horn & C. Zukin (2010), No End in Sight: The Agony of Prolonged Unemployment, New Brunswick, NJ: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University. Brown, S. & J.G. Sessions (1997), “A Profile of UK Unemployment: Regional Versus Demographic Influences”, Regional Studies, 31(4), 351–366.
  6. Cameron, A.C. & P. Trivedi, (2005), Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  7. Chilosi A. (2013), “Long-term Unemployment in the Varieties of Capitalism”, MPRA Paper No: 58553, posted at 14 September 2014,, 16.4.2015. Erol H. & A. Özdemir (2012), “The Effectiveness of the Employment Policies Implemented in Turkey in the Times of Economic Crisis”, TODAIE’s Review of Public Administration, 6(2), 71-104.
  8. Evans G.W. (1993), “Sectoral Imbalance and Unemployment in the United Kingdom: 1963-84”, Oxford Economic Papers, 45, 440-456.
  9. Fagan, J. & R.B. Freeman (1999), “Crime and Work”, in: M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 25,113-178. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Folmer H. & J. Van Dijk (1988), “Differences of Unemployment Duration: A Regional or a Personal Problem?”, Applied Economics, 20, 1233-1251.
  10. Geewax, M. (2011), “The Impacts of Long-Term Unemployment”, Part of an NPR special series, Still No Job: Over a Year without Enough Work,. Godofsky, J, & C. van Horn & C. Zukin (2010), American Workers Assess an Economic Disaster, New Brunswick, NJ: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Rutgers University. Greene, W.H. (2012),
  11. Econometric Analysis, Seventh Edition,
  12. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA. Heckman, J.J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, 47(l), 53-161.
  13. Hornstein, A. & T.A. Lubik (2010), “The Rise in Long-Term Unemployment Potentia