SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Relationship management in businesses: A scale development study

İşletmelerde ilişki yönetimi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması

Ali Şükrü Çetinkaya(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8815-7165
Umut Yavuz(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3681-704X
Shafiq Habibi(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4642-7849
Pages
1–29
Publication Date
2025-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is evaluated that the research findings and results will provide useful results that will guide industry practitioners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The structure and functioning of the relationship between employees at all levels in the enterprise are quite complex.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, the scale was created using studies in the literature and qualitative research findings. 500 valid survey responses were obtained from randomly selected employees of industrial enterprises.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is evaluated that the research findings and results will provide useful results that will guide industry practitioners.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ilişki yönetimi · işyeri iş ilişkileri · ölçek geliştirme

Abstract

The structure and functioning of the relationship between employees at all levels in the enterprise are quite complex. Sustainable healthy relationship management makes it necessary to gain effective communication knowledge, skills, and competence to employees with the right techniques and methods. Despite its importance in business, it has been observed in the literature that there are limited research in this field that serves directly to the practitioners. The aim of this mixed designed research is to develop a scale for determining the relationship management in businesses. In the research, first, a detailed literature review has been made and the proposal of the theoretical model has been clarified. Next, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the representatives of the target sample to get in-depth knowledge about how it takes place in practice. Then, the scale was created using studies in the literature and qualitative research findings. 500 valid survey responses were obtained from randomly selected employees of industrial enterprises. The proposed scale was tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis techniques. The validity of the proposed model can be ensured by retesting the scale put forward according to the research findings and results in the sector. It is evaluated that the research findings and results will provide useful results that will guide industry practitioners.

Özet

İşletmelerde her seviyede çalışanlar arası ilişkilerin yapısı ve işleyişi oldukça karmaşık bir yapıdadır. Sürdürebilir sağlıklı ilişki yönetimi; doğru teknik ve yöntemlerle çalışanlara etkili iletişim bilgi, beceri ve yetkinliği kazandırmayı gerekli kılmaktadır. İş yaşamındaki önemine rağmen bu alanda yazında doğrudan pratik uygulamaya hizmet eden yeterli çalışma olmadığı gözlenmiştir. Karma araştırma deseninde gerçekleştirilen bu araştırmada, işletmelerde ilişki yönetimini belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada öncelikle detaylı literatür taraması yapılmış ve ardından, hedef kitle temsilcileri ile yarı yapılandırılmış mülakat görüşmeleri gerçekleştirilerek sektör uygulamaları bağlamında konu hakkında derinlemesine bilgi edinilmiştir. Sonra, literatürde yer alan çalışmalardan ve nitel araştırma bulgularından yararlanılarak ölçek oluşturulmuştur. Sanayi işletmelerinden tesadüfi yöntemle belirlenmiş çalışanlardan 500 geçerli anket geri dönüşü elde edilmiştir. Açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analiz teknikleri kullanılarak önerilen ölçek test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgu ve sonuçlarına göre ortaya konulan ölçek sektörde tekrar test edilerek önerilen modelin geçerliliği sağlanabilir. Araştırma bulgu ve sonuçlarının sektör uygulayıcılarına yol gösterici yararlı sonuçlar sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çetinkaya, A. Ş., Yavuz, U., Habibi, S. (2025). Relationship management in businesses: A scale development study. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.30855/gjeb.2025.11.1.001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (87)

  1. Abun, D., Magallanes, T., Agoot, F., ve Benedict, S. (2018). Measuring workplace relationship and job satisfaction of divine word colleges'employees in ilocos region. International Journal of Current Research, 10(11), 75279-75286. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.33015.11.2018
  2. Akkuş, B., ve İzci, N. A. (2018). Sistem yaklaşımı, kavramları ve yönetim. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 223-237.
  3. Allen, T. D., ve Eby, L. T. (2007). The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach: Blackwell Publishing.
  4. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., ve Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
  5. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., ve Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
  6. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri SPSS uygulamalı. Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık, 7-253.
  7. Anıl, İ. A. (2010). İşletmelerde iletişim olgusu ve iletişim sürecinde dönüşüm. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sakarya Universitesi.
  8. Armutlulu, İ. (2000). İşletmelerde Uygulamalı İstatistik. İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  9. Bakar, H. A., ve Omillion-Hodges, L. (2019). The mediating role of relative communicative behavior on the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0190
  10. Berko, R. M., Wolvin, A. D., ve Ray, R. L. (1997). Business communication in a changing world: St. Martin's Press.
  11. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., ve Walker, H. J. (2007). Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(8), 979-1003. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.443
  12. Broom, G. M., Casey, S., ve Ritchey, J. (2000). Concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations, 3-22.
  13. Caillier, J. G. (2017). The impact of high‐quality workplace relationships in public organizations. Public Administration, 95(3), 638-653. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12328
  14. Colbert, A. E., Bono, J. E., ve Purvanova, R. K. (2016). Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1199-1223. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0506
  15. Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., ve Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
  16. Cropanzano, R., ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  17. Dhir, S., Dutta, T., ve Ghosh, P. (2020). Linking employee loyalty with job satisfaction using PLS–SEM modelling. Personnel Review. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2019-0107
  18. Dienesch, R. M., ve Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
  19. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., ve Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
  20. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., ve Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi (5. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  21. Dutton, J. E., ve Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, 3, 263-278.
  22. Dutton, J. E., ve Ragins, B. R. (2017). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: Psychology Press.
  23. Edela, J. (2003). Managing Relationship at Work (4th ed.): Pergamon Flexible Learning.
  24. Farr-Wharton, B., Shacklock, K., Brunetto, Y., Teo, S. T., ve Farr-Wharton, R. (2017). Workplace bullying, workplace relationships and job outcomes for police officers in Australia. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 325-332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1328180
  25. Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., ve Buckley, M. R. (2009). Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1379-1403. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309344741
  26. Fiske, A. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
  27. Frink, D. D., Hall, A. T., Perryman, A. A., Ranft, A. L., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., ve Royle, M. T. (2008). Meso-level theory of accountability in organizations. In Research in personnel and human resources management: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(08)27005-2
  28. George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e: Pearson Education India.
  29. Gerstner, C. R., ve Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827.
  30. Grunig, J. E., ve Hung-Baesecke, C.-j. F. (2015). The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: A cognitive, behavioral study. In Public relations as relationship management (ss.p. 63-113): Routledge.
  31. Güleç, O. (2008). Örgüt kültürünün bir yansıması olarak işletmelerde ast üst ilişkileri ve Denizli'de bir uygulama. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
  32. Gürbüz, S., ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  33. Hall, A. T., Zinko, R., Perryman, A. A., ve Ferris, G. R. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior and reputation: Mediators in the relationships between accountability and job performance and satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(4), 381-392. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809331504
  34. Hampton Jr, C. T. (2019). Supervisor-Subordinate Relationships and Its Effect on Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects.
  35. Han, Y., ve Perry, J. L. (2020). Employee accountability: development of a multidimensional scale. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), 224-251. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1690606
  36. Herman, H., Dasborough, M. T., ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 195-211. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.005
  37. Jian, G., ve Dalisay, F. (2017). Conversation at work: The effects of leader-member conversational quality. Communication Research, 44(2), 177-197. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565924
  38. Johnson, S. K., Geroy, G. D., ve Griego, O. V. (1999). The mentoring model theory: dimensions in mentoring protocols. Career Development International. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620439910295736
  39. Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (Vol. 5): Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ankara, Turkey.
  40. Kamdar, D., ve Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1286
  41. Kaya, A. (2018). Korelasyon Çeşitleri ve Regresyon. TechWorm, 1-3. Erişim adresi: https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr
  42. Kim, Y., Cheung, K. Q., ve Kim, M. (2017). Workplace relationships and employee engagement: Domestic workers vs. expatriates. Academy of Asian Business Review, 3(1), 55-73.
  43. Knapp, M. L., ve Vangelisti, A. (2005). Relationship stages: A communication perspective. Interpersonal communication and human relationships, 36-49.
  44. Kram, K. E., ve Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/256064
  45. Lawrence, P., ve Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and Environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  46. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  47. Ledingham, J. A., ve Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public relations review, 24(1), 55-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
  48. Lee, A. P., Teng, H.-Y., ve Chen, C.-Y. (2015). Workplace relationship quality and employee job outcomes in hotel firms. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 14(4), 398-422. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2015.1002068
  49. Li, C.-K., ve Hung, C.-H. (2009). The influence of transformational leadership on workplace relationships and job performance. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(8), 1129-1142. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.8.1129
  50. Liden, R. C., ve Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
  51. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., ve Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662
  52. Lin, S.-C., ve Lin, J. S.-J. (2011). Impacts of coworkers relationships on organizational commitment-and intervening effects of job satisfaction. African Journal of Business Management, 5(8), 3396-3409. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.1558
  53. Linderbaum, B. A., ve Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36(6), 1372-1405. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373145
  54. Marr, J. D. (2009). Interpersonal communication and professional relationships between faculty and administrators in higher education. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Spalding University.
  55. Maslyn, J. M., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697.
  56. Mayer, R. C., ve Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123.
  57. McDaugall, M., ve Beattie, R. S. (1997). Peer mentoring at work: The nature and outcomes of non-hierarchical developmental relationships. Management Learning, 28(4), 423-437. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507697284003
  58. Mikkola, L., ve Valo, M. (2019). Workplace communication: Routledge.
  59. Minsky, B. D. (2002). LMX dyad agreement: Construct definition and the role of supervisor/subordinate similarity and communication in understanding LMX.
  60. Nemanick Jr, R. C. (2000). Comparing formal and informal mentors: Does type make a difference? Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 136-138. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.4474567
  61. Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., ve Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. Research in personnel and human resources management, 21, 129-173. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(02)21003-8
  62. Omilion-Hodges, L. M., Ptacek, J. K., ve Zerilli, D. H. (2016). A comprehensive review and communication research agenda of the contextualized workgroup: The evolution and future of leader-member exchange, coworker exchange, and team-member exchange. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 343-377.
  63. Papatraianou, L. H., ve Le Cornu, R. (2014). Problematising the role of personal and professional relationships in early career teacher resilience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(1), 128.
  64. Persson, S. S., Lindström, P. N., Pettersson, P., ve Andersson, I. (2018). Workplace relationships impact self-rated health: A survey of Swedish municipal health care employees. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 60(1), 85-94. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182721
  65. Polit, D. F., ve Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
  66. Putnam, L. L., ve Mumby, D. K. (2013). The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods: Sage Publications.
  67. Ragins, B. R., ve Kram, K. E. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice: Sage Publications.
  68. Ramarajan, L., Barsade, S. G., ve Burack, O. R. (2008). The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(1), 4-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701750980
  69. Reitz, A. K., Zimmermann, J., Hutteman, R., Specht, J., ve Neyer, F. J. (2014). How peers make a difference: The role of peer groups and peer relationships in personality development. European journal of personality, 28(3), 279-288. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1965
  70. Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 169-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130206
  71. Scandura, T. A., ve Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251-265. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1046
  72. Scott, W. R., ve Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives: Routledge.
  73. Searle, M. S. (2000). Is leisure theory needed for leisure studies? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 138-142. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949903
  74. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods in Business. Canada: John Willey & Sons. In: Inc.
  75. Sias, P. M. (2005). Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences. Communication studies, 56(4), 375-395. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500319450
  76. Sias, P. M., ve Cahill, D. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports, 62(3), 273-299. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319809374611
  77. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., ve Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson Boston, MA.
  78. Tenbrink, A. P., ve Speer, A. B. (2022). Accountability during Performance Appraisals: The Development and Validation of the Rater Accountability Scale. Human Performance, 1-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876
  79. Ter Hoeven, C. L., ve Van Zoonen, W. (2023). Helping others and feeling engaged in the context of workplace flexibility: The importance of communication control. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(1), 62-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419898799
  80. Thomlison, T. (2000). An Interpersonal Primer with Implications for Public Relations, Public Relations As Relationship Management. In: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ: Inc., Publishers.
  81. Tran, K. T., Nguyen, P. V., Dang, T. T., ve Ton, T. N. (2018). The impacts of the high-quality workplace relationships on job performance: A perspective on staff nurses in Vietnam. Behavioral Sciences, 8(12), 109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8120109
  82. Tuncer, A. İ. (2015). Bir ılişki yönetimi olarak halkla ılişkiler: Örgüt ve kamu ılişkilerinin çözümlenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İletişim Ana Bilim Dalı, Antalya.
  83. Wall, B. (1999). Working relationships: Davies-Black Publishing.
  84. Whitener, E. M., ve Walz, P. M. (1993). Exchange theory determinants of affective and continuance commitment and turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(3), 265-281. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1993.1019
  85. Yazicioglu, Y., ve Erdogan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamali Bilimsel Arastirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  86. Yılmaz, A. (2019). Servis sorumlu hemşirelerine uygulanan güçlendirme programinin güçlendirme hemşirelik uygulamalari üzerinde kontrol ve hasta güvenliği kültürüne etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  87. Yozcu, Ö. (2010). İlişki yönetimi bağlamında çalışan ilişkileri: Otel işletmesine yönelik bir araştırma (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.