SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

At the heart of innovative work behavior (IWB): The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between creative self-efficacy and innovative work behavior

Yenilikçi iş davranışının kalbinde ne var? Yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisinde inovasyon kültürünün düzenleyici rolü

Kerem Arda Dağ(Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu)0009-0003-4924-4786
Semra Güney(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8809-8983
Saadet Nur Karadenizli Sinap(HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2908-2172
Pages
559–577
Publication Date
2026-06-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that creative self-efficacy positively and significantly influences IWB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effect of creative self-efficacy on innovative work behavior (IWB) and the role of the subdimensions of innovation culture (organizational values, leadership behaviors, innovative work climate, organizational resources, internal organizational processes, and organizational success) in this process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research data were collected via an online survey from 249 participants working in a public institution and in the private sector within the information technology sector in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that creative self-efficacy positively and significantly influences IWB.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:yaratıcı öz yeterlilik · yaratıcılık · bilgi teknolojileri sektörü

Abstract

This study examines the effect of creative self-efficacy on innovative work behavior (IWB) and the role of the subdimensions of innovation culture (organizational values, leadership behaviors, innovative work climate, organizational resources, internal organizational processes, and organizational success) in this process. Research data were collected via an online survey from 249 participants working in a public institution and in the private sector within the information technology sector in Ankara. Hypotheses were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, PROCESS Macro Model 1, and structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that creative self-efficacy positively and significantly influences IWB. Additionally, it was determined that all subdimensions of innovation culture exhibit positive and significant relationships with IWB. However, moderation analyses revealed that the subdimensions of innovation culture do not play a significant moderating role in the relationship between creative self-efficacy and IWB. On the other hand, the results of the structural equation modeling revealed that innovative work climate and internal organizational processes, in particular, were more prominent. The findings indicate that creative self-efficacy and innovation culture provide direct and complementary contributions to explaining IWB.

Özet

Bu çalışma, yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisini ve inovasyon kültürünün alt boyutlarının (örgütsel değerler, lider davranışları, inovatif çalışma iklimi, örgütsel kaynaklar, örgüt içi süreçler ve örgütsel başarı) bu süreçteki rolünü incelemektedir. Araştırma verileri, Ankara’da bilgi teknolojileri alanındaki bir kamu kurumu ile özel sektörde çalışan 249 katılımcıdan çevrim içi anket yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Hipotezler doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, korelasyon analizi, PROCESS Macro Model-1 ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular, yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yenilikçi iş davranışını pozitif ve anlamlı biçimde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bunun yanı sıra inovasyon kültürünün tüm alt boyutlarının yenilikçi iş davranışı ile pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler sergilediği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, düzenleyicilik analizleri inovasyon kültürünün alt boyutlarının yaratıcı öz yeterlilik ile yenilikçi iş davranışı arasındaki ilişkide anlamlı bir düzenleyici rol üstlenmediğini ortaya koymuştur. Öte yandan yapısal eşitlik modellemesi sonuçları ise, özellikle inovatif çalışma iklimi ile örgüt içi süreçlerin daha ön plana çıktığını göstermiştir. Bulgular, yenilikçi iş davranışının açıklanmasında yaratıcı öz yeterlilik ile inovasyon kültürünün doğrudan ve tamamlayıcı katkılar sunduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dağ, K. A., Güney, S., Sinap, S. N. K. (2026). At the heart of innovative work behavior (IWB): The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between creative self-efficacy and innovative work behavior. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 559–577. https://ajindex.com/articles/1397098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Abbas, M. and Abbas, J. (2023). Innovation, self-efficacy and creativity-oriented HRM: what helps to enhance the innovativeness of organization employees? Journal of Personnel Management, 1(1), 54-67.
  2. Akbulut, F. N. and Yiğit, İ. (2025). The moderating role of psychological empowerment in the effect of organizational support on innovative work behavior. Journal of Biga Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 6(2), 128-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.70754/biibfd.1740693
  3. Aktaş, B. N. (2026). Collaborative leadership and employee perception in decision-making: The meditating role of team excellence. Journal of Human and Work, 13(1), 1-25.
  4. Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1-14.
  5. Al-Taie, M. and Khattak, M. N. (2024). The impact of perceived organizational support and human resources practices on innovative work behavior: Does gender matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1401916. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401916
  6. Amabile, T. and Pratt, M. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  8. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  9. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  10. Aslam, M. S., Qammar, A., Nawaz, Q. and Ahmed, F. (2026). Leveraging learning organization to foster ambidextrous innovation through work engagement. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 17(1), 298-324.
  11. Atabek, O. (2020). Adaptation of creative self-efficacy scale into Turkish language. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 84-97.
  12. Balková, M., Lejsková, P. and Ližbetinová, L. (2022). The values supporting the creativity of employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 805153. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.805153
  13. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  14. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
  16. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited [Editorial]. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
  17. Bourne, H. and Jenkins, M. (2013). Organizational values: A dynamic perspective. Organization Studies, 34(4), 495-514. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467155
  18. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. and Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515-524. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  19. Carmeli, A. and Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
  20. Chen, Y. (2024). Teacher autonomy, creative self-efficacy, and innovative behavior: Perspectives from Chinese university EFL teachers. Arab World English Journal, 15(2), 73-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no2.5
  21. Chen, Y. M., Kao, Y. F., Yan, M. R. and Yen, M. H. (2026). Managing competitive advantage in emerging knowledge-based economies: The strategic configuration perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Advance online publication. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2026.2615351
  22. Çimen, İ. and Yücel, C. (2017). Innovative behavior scale (IWB): Adaptation to Turkish culture. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(3), 365-381.
  23. Cindiloğlu Demirer, M. and Yaşar, Ç. (2025). Dönüşümcü liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışı üzerine etkisinde yenilikçi örgüt kültürünün aracı etkisi: Lojistik sektöründe bir uygulama. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 52-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1545944
  24. Çubukcu, A., Karaboğa, K. and Ayaz, H. İ. (2023). Measuring innovation culture: A validation study of the innovation quotient model and a research on a defense industry firm in Turkey. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 12(2), 33-58.
  25. Dar, N., Ahmad, S., Badar, K. and Kundi, Y. M. (2024). Unraveling the link between innovative work behavior and despotic leadership: the roles of supervisor conflict and dispositional resistance to change trait. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(4), 816-834.
  26. De Jong, J. and Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8691.2010.00547.X
  27. Dewantara, D., Asmony, T. and Nurmayanti, S. (2023). The effect of organizational climate on innovative work behaviour with organizational learning behaviour as an intervening variable in employees of the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Industry Office. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(5), 459-470.
  28. Etikariena, A. and Widyasari, P. (2020). Quality education to succeed the SDGs among college students through the role of learner empowerment and creative self-efficacy to develop innovative work behavior. E3S Web of Conferences, 211, 01018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021101018
  29. Gelaidan, H. M., Al-Swidi, A. K. and Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2024). Servant and authentic leadership as drivers of innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(6), 1938-1966. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2022-0382
  30. Ghosh, V., Sengupta, T., Narayanamurthy, G. and Ishizaka, A. (2023). Examining collective creative self-efficacy as a competency indicator of group talent management: a study of SMEs in an emerging economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(6), 1182-1212.
  31. Gist, M. E. and Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/258770
  32. Gong, Y., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D.-R. and Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827-851. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0177
  33. Haile, E. A. and Tüzüner, V. L. (2022). Organizational learning capability and its impact on organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 69-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-03-2022-0015
  34. Hameli, K., Vehapi, A. and Tafili, E. (2025). Fostering innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support and employee self-efficacy. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Advance online publication. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2024-0166
  35. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  36. Hendrikx, K., Schreurs, B. and Jansen in de Wal, J. (2022). Exploring the role of implicit person theory in the relationship between innovative work climate and proactive behaviour at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(7), 643-660.
  37. Imran, M., Li, J., Bano, S. and Rashid, W. (2025). Impact of democratic leadership on employee innovative behavior with mediating role of psychological safety and creative potential. Sustainability, 17(5), 1879.
  38. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  39. Jo, Y. and Hong, A. J. (2022). Impact of agile learning on innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model of employee engagement and perceived organizational support. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 900830. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900830
  40. Jun, K. and Lee, J. (2023). Transformational leadership and followers’ innovative behavior: Roles of commitment to change and organizational support for creativity. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 320. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040320
  41. Lamb, K. N., Boedeker, P. and Kettler, T. (2025). Measuring creative self-efficacy: instrument development and validation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101738. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101738
  42. Li, M. S., Li, J., Li, J. M., Liu, Z. W. and Deng, X. T. (2023). The impact of team learning climate on innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge integration capability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1104073. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1104073
  43. Liehr, J. and Hauff, S. (2025). Promoting employees’ innovative work behavior through innovation-specific leader behavior: An AMO-approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(1), 215-232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.57
  44. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, M. and Li, X. (2026). Understanding the impact of digital organizational culture on employees’ innovative work behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 88, 103047.
  45. McClelland, G. H. and Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376-390. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
  46. Nafei, W. A. (2016). Organizational agility: The key to organizational success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 296-309.
  47. Özkan, G. V. (2017). The effect of employees’ level of self-efficacy on their creative and innovative work behaviors: A comparative evaluation of organizations in different sectors. Journal of Yasar University, 12(47), 181-191.
  48. Pajuoja, M., Viitala, R. and Henttonen, K. (2025). Supporting innovating employees: how managerial coaching affects four dimensions of innovative work behavior. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 2937-2958. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00837-6
  49. Qasim, M. and Laghari, A. A. (2025). Belonging through values: ethical leadership, creativity, and psychological safety with ethical climate as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559427. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559427
  50. Rao, J. and Weintraub, J. (2013). How innovative is your company’s culture? MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 29-37.
  51. Saber Seleem, E. A. E., Ahmed, G. K., El-hameed, N. A. E. G. A. and Abdullah, S. O. (2026). Psychological drivers of innovative work behavior in nursing: the roles of creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisors, uncertainty avoidance, and psychological capital. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 62(1), 49.
  52. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credits, interest, and the business cycle. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
  53. Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  54. Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., and Seo, M. G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727-748. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0325
  55. Shrivastava, S., Pazzaglia, F., Sonpar, K. and McNamara, P. (2015). Unpacking the effect of exploration during environmental uncertainty: Evidence from the information technology sector. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 33(1), 36-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1330
  56. Skerlavaj, M., Song, J. H. and Lee, Y. (2010). Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in South Korean firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6390-6403. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2010.02.080
  57. Song, L., Inmor, S. and Cuijten, N. (2024). The influence of supportive organizational climate on employees’ innovation behavior. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 2219-2232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.182
  58. Sung, S. Y. and Choi, J. N. (2014). Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development on organizational innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 393-412. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1897
  59. Sutantina, S. (2026). From employee engagement to open service innovation: The role of creative self-efficacy and employee innovative behaviour–a conceptual analysis. In S. Hadi, R. Hidayat, A. Lukitaningsih, O. L. Dar and T. A. Hakim (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Business, Economic, and Social Sustainability (ICOBES 2025) (pp. 659-673). Atlantis Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-626-5_49
  60. Takeed, Z., Ali, M. D., Shah, S. I., Muhammad, A. and Qiu, S. (2025). The effect of entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior: the mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and organizational learning. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 17(5), 1288-1310. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2024-0326
  61. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation: Integrating technological market and organizational change. Chicester: Wiley.
  62. Tierney, P. and Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
  63. Tierney, P. and Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
  64. Wang, S., Xu, X. and Liu, Y. (2022). Will the digital transformation of enterprises reduce the risk of debt default. Securities Market Guide, 4, 45-56.
  65. West, M. A. and Farr, J. L. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester: Wiley
  66. Yang, H. and Zhou, D. (2022). Perceived organizational support and creativity of science-technology talents in the digital age: The effects of affective commitment, innovative self-efficacy and digital thinking. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2421-2437. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S378141
  67. You, Y., Hu, Z., Li, J., Wang, Y. and Xu, M. (2022). The effect of organizational innovation climate on employee innovative behavior: The role of psychological ownership and task interdependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 856407. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856407