SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 17

The Scope of e-Government in the European Union and Potential Applications to the Water Framework Directive

George ZAIMES
Kallopi KALAMPOUKA
Dimitris EMMANOULOUDIS
Pages
—
Publication Date
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Applications to the Water Framework Directive are described that could help Member States meet the deadlines of the Directive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Governments are trying new systems to engage citizens and improve their trust.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The European Union because of its large population and cultural and linguistic diversity has recognized e-government utility with the eEurope 2005 Action Plan.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Applications to the Water Framework Directive are described that could help Member States meet the deadlines of the Directive.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Governments are trying new systems to engage citizens and improve their trust. Electronic government (e-government) can reform public administrations by changing their organization, enhancing citizen services and information accessibility and reducing costs. The European Union because of its large population and cultural and linguistic diversity has recognized e-government utility with the eEurope 2005 Action Plan. The Internal Market Information is an e-government example. A sector of the European Union that could benefit from e-government is the environment (e.g. water resources). Applications to the Water Framework Directive are described that could help Member States meet the deadlines of the Directive.

Özet

Governments are trying new systems to engage citizens and improve their trust. Electronic government (e-government) can reform public administrations by changing their organization, enhancing citizen services and information accessibility and reducing costs. The European Union because of its large population and cultural and linguistic diversity has recognized e-government utility with the eEurope 2005 Action Plan. The Internal Market Information is an e-government example. A sector of the European Union that could benefit from e-government is the environment (e.g. water resources). Applications to the Water Framework Directive are described that could help Member States meet the deadlines of the Directive.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAIMES, G., KALAMPOUKA, K., EMMANOULOUDIS, D. (2012). The Scope of e-Government in the European Union and Potential Applications to the Water Framework Directive. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 17. https://ajindex.com/articles/139666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bekkers, V. and V. Homburg (2005), “e-Government as an Information Ecology: Backgrounds and Concepts”, in: V. Bekkers and V. Homburg (eds.) The Information Ecology of e-Government: e-Government As Institutional and Technological Innovation in Public Administration, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 1–20.
  2. Bruen M. (2007), “Systems Analysis – A New Paradigm and Decision Support Tools for the Water Framework Directive”, Hydrologic Earth Systems Science Discussion 4, pp. 1491–1518. Carter L. and F. Bélanger (2005), “The Utilization of e-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors”, Information Systems Journal, 15(1), pp. 5–25, Doi:. Centeno, C., R. van Bavel and J.C. Burgelman (2005), “A Prospective View of e-Government in the European Union”, The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(2), pp. 59–66.
  3. Craglia M. and I. Masser (2003), “Access to Geographic Information: A European Perspective”, Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 15, pp. 51-59. de Moor, A. and H. Weigand (2006), “Effective Communication in Virtual Adversarial Collaborative Communities”, Journal of Community Informatics, 2(2), pp. 116-134.
  4. European Commission (2002), Guidance on public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Active involvement, consultation, and public access to information, Guidance document no. 8 for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), European Commission,, 22.01.2011.
  5. European Commission (2009), Guidance for reporting under the Water Framework Directive, Guidance Document no. 21 for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Technical Report 2009-029, European Commission,, 23.01.2011.
  6. European Union Parliament (2000), “Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy”, Official Journal of the European Communities, 327., 25.01.2011.
  7. Evans, D. and D.C. Yen (2005), “e-Government: An analysis for implementation: Framework for Understanding Cultural and Social Impact”, Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 2005, pp. 354–373, Doi:. Haddadin, H. (2002), “Water Issues in the Middle East Challenges and Opportunities”, Water Policy, 4, pp. 205–222.
  8. Heeks, R., S. Bailur (2007), “Analyzing eGovernment Research: Perspectives, Philosophies, Theories, Methods and Practice”, Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), pp. 243–