Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2011 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 16

An Investigation on the Relationship between Government Size and Unemployment Rate: Evidence from OECD Countries

Pages
—
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The empirical findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between size of government and unemployment rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is widely accepted that size of government is an important determinant of labor market performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recent empirical studies indicate that the size of government is inversely related to labor market performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The empirical findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between size of government and unemployment rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is widely accepted that size of government is an important determinant of labor market performance. Therefore, understanding the effects of government size on employment is both empirically and theoretically critical. Recent empirical studies indicate that the size of government is inversely related to labor market performance. This study examines the relationship between government size and unemployment rate for 17 OECD countries over the period of 1990-2007 using panel cointegration analysis. The empirical findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between size of government and unemployment rates.

Özet

It is widely accepted that size of government is an important determinant of labor market performance. Therefore, understanding the effects of government size on employment is both empirically and theoretically critical. Recent empirical studies indicate that the size of government is inversely related to labor market performance. This study examines the relationship between government size and unemployment rate for 17 OECD countries over the period of 1990-2007 using panel cointegration analysis. The empirical findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between size of government and unemployment rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYSU, A., DÖKMEN, G. (2011). An Investigation on the Relationship between Government Size and Unemployment Rate: Evidence from OECD Countries. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 16. https://ajindex.com/articles/139621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abrams, B.A. (1999), “The Effect of Government Size on the Unemployment Rate”, Public Choice, 99(3–4), 395–401.
  2. Blanchard, O. and J. Wolfers (2000), “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence”, The Economic Journal, 110 (March): C1–C33. Choi, I. (2001), “Unit Root Test for Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.
  3. Christopoulos, D.K., E.G. Tsionas (2002), “Unemployment and Government Gize: Is there any Credible Causality?”, Applied Economics Letters, 9(12), 797–800.
  4. Christopoulos, D.K., J. Loizides, E.G. Tsionas (2005), “The Abrams Curve of Government Size and Unemployment: Evidence from Panel Data”, Applied Economics, 37, 1193–99.
  5. Daveri, F., G. Tabellini (2000), “Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries”, Economic Policy, (30), 47–104. Doménech, R. & JR. Garcia (2008), “Unemployment, Taxation and Public Expenditure in OECD Economies”, European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 202–217.
  6. Feldmann, H. (2006), “Government Size and Unemployment: Evidence from Industrial Countries”, Public Choice, 127, 451–67.
  7. Feldmann, H. (2010), “Government Size and Unemployment in Developing Countries”, Applied Economics Letters, 17, 289–292.
  8. Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-63.
  9. Kao, C. and M.H. Chiang (2000), “On The Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, 179–222.
  10. Karras, G. (1993), “Employment and Output Effects of Government Spending: Is Government Size Important?”, Economic Inquiry, 31(3), 354–369.
  11. Levin, A., Chien-Fu Lin and J. Chia-Shang Chu (2002), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
  12. Maddala, G.S. and S. Wu (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data and A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 61, 631-652.
  13. Nickell, S. and R. Layard (1999), “Labour Market Institutions and Economic Performance.” In Handbook of labour economics, vol. 3, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. Amsterdam: North Holland. Nickell, S., L. Nunziata, W. Ochel (2005), “Unemployment in The OECD Since the 1960s. What do We Know?”, The Economic Journal, 115, 1–27.
  14. OECD (2010), OECD Factbook 2009:
  15. Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, 10 Eylül 2010,, 25.03.2011.
  16. Pedroni, P. (1997), “Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic a