SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 45

Arms Race Between Turkey and Greece: Time-Varying Causality Analysis

Türkiye ve Yunanistan Arasındaki Silahlanma Yarışı: Zamanla Değişen Nedensellik Analizi

Asiye TÜTÜNCÜ
Burak ŞAHİNGÖZ
Pages
25–36
Publication Date
2020-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, according to the time-varying causality testing results, the presence of an arms race can be confirmed between the two countries for the periods 1975-1990 and 2000-2014.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An arms race is the dynamic process followed by states in the acquisition of weapons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study elaborated on the arms race hypothesis between Turkey and Greece for the period 1960-2016 with the help of time-varying causality testing as well as bootstrap causality testing and asymmetric causality testing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, according to the time-varying causality testing results, the presence of an arms race can be confirmed between the two countries for the periods 1975-1990 and 2000-2014.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Silahlanma Yarışı · Savunma Harcamaları · Asimetrik Nedensellik

Abstract

An arms race is the dynamic process followed by states in the acquisition of weapons. An arms race requires mutual military expenditures during this process to support the arms race hypothesis among states. This study elaborated on the arms race hypothesis between Turkey and Greece for the period 1960-2016 with the help of time-varying causality testing as well as bootstrap causality testing and asymmetric causality testing. The bootstrap causality test results proved that there is a unidirectional causality relation between Greece’s defense expenditures and Turkey’s defense expenditures, whereas the asymmetric causality testing results proved that a mutual relationship exists between the two states’ defense expenditures. Further, according to the time-varying causality testing results, the presence of an arms race can be confirmed between the two countries for the periods 1975-1990 and 2000-2014.

Özet

Silahlanma yarışı, ülkelerin silah edinimi konusunda yaşadıkları dinamik süreci ifade etmektedir. Ülkeler arasında silahlanma yarışı hipotezinin geçerli olabilmesi için bu süreçte askeri harcamaların karşılıklı etkileşimi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye ile Yunanistan arasındaki silahlanma yarışı hipotezi, 1960-2016 dönemi Hacker ve Hatemi-J (2006) bootstrap nedensellik ve Hatemi-J (2012) asimetrik nedensellik testlerinin yanı sıra zamanla değişen nedensellik testi yardımıyla incelenmiştir. Hacker ve Hatemi-J (2006) bootstrap nedensellik testi sonuçları, Yunanistan’ın savunma harcamalarından Türkiye’nin savunma harcamalarına tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu, asimetrik nedensellik testi ise iki ülkenin savunma harcamaları arasında saklı ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Zamanla değişen nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre 1975-1990 ve 2000-2014 dönemlerinde iki ülke arasında silahlanma yarışının geçerli olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜTÜNCÜ, A., ŞAHİNGÖZ, B. (2020). Arms Race Between Turkey and Greece: Time-Varying Causality Analysis. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 45, 25–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/139615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Andreou, A. S. & G. A. Zombanakis (2011), “Financial versus Human Resources in The Greek–Turkısh Arms Race 10 Years on: A Forecasting Investigation Using Artificial Neural Networks”, Defence and Peace Economics, 22 (4), 459-469.
  2. Balcilar, M., Z. A. Ozdemir, & Y. Arslanturk (2010), “Economic Growth and Energy Consumption Causal Nexus Viewed through a Bootstrap Rolling Window”, Energy Economics, 32, 1398-1410.
  3. Brauer, J. (2002) “Survey and Review of the Defense Economics Literature on Greece and Turkey: What have We Learned?”, Defence and Peace Economics, 13 (2), 85-107.
  4. Collier, P. & A. Hoeffler (2002), “Military Expenditure: Threats, Aid, and Arms Races”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2927, 1-23.
  5. Dickey, D. A. & W. A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057- 1072. Dunne, J. P., N. Eftychia & R. P. Smith (2005), “Is there an Arms Race between Greece and Turkey?”, Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 11 (2), 1-35.
  6. Georgiou, G. (1990), “Is There an Arms Race Between Greece and Turkey? Some Preliminary Econometric Results”, Cyprus Journal of Economics, 3 (1), 58–73.
  7. Georgiou, G. M., P. T. Kapopoulos & S. Lazaretou (1996), “Modelling Greek-Turkish Rivalry: An Empirical Investigation of Defence SpendingDynamics”, Journal of Peace Research, 33 (2), 229-239.
  8. Granger, C. W. J. & G. Yoon (2002), “Hidden Cointegration”, University of California Economics Working Paper No. 2002-02.
  9. Hacker, R. S. & A. Hatemi-J (2006), “Tests for Causality between Integrated Variables Using Asymptotic and Bootstrap Distributions: Theory and Application”, Applied Economics, 38 (13), 1489-1500.
  10. Harari, Y. N. (2015), Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, New York: Harper Collins. Hatemi-J, A. (2012), “Asymmetric Causality Tests with an Application”, Empirical Economy, 43, 447-456. Hiro Y. T. & Taku Y. (1995), “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes”, Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250.
  11. Intriligator, M. D. & D. L. Brito (2000), “Arms Race”, Defence and Peace Economics 11 (1), 45-54.
  12. Jervis, R. (1978), “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, 30 (2), 167-214.
  13. Kollias, C. (1991), “Creece and Turkey: The Case Study of an Arms Race from The Greek Perspective”, SPOUDAI-Journal of Economics and Business, 41 (1), 64-81.
  14. Kollias, C. & S. Makrydakis (1997), “Is There a Greek-Turkish Arms Race?: Evidence from Cointegration and Caus