SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 29

The Visible Hand of Economics: Institutional Chance Performance and Sustainable Institutional Development

Selma Sevinç ORHAN
Pages
73–92
Publication Date
2016-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concept of institution is the product of an interdisciplinary approach providing organizational and behavioral connection between economic theory and economic institutions and giving the economics the lost opportunity to question the political economics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, there is the analysis of the relationship between economic development and institutionalization process which enhances the institutional change performance of the economy and reduces operation costs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The change and regulation process, which is brought into the price mechanism by mainstream economics through invisible hand metaphor, is discussed within “visible hand” logic by property rights, transaction costs, and contracts economy approach in the NIE approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concept of institution is the product of an interdisciplinary approach providing organizational and behavioral connection between economic theory and economic institutions and giving the economics the lost opportunity to question the political economics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, there is the analysis of the relationship between economic development and institutionalization process which enhances the institutional change performance of the economy and reduces operation costs. The change and regulation process, which is brought into the price mechanism by mainstream economics through invisible hand metaphor, is discussed within “visible hand” logic by property rights, transaction costs, and contracts economy approach in the NIE approach. By this way, institutions assume the visible hand role in the processes of regulation, preparation and implementation of common mandatory rules and laws in social life which are ignored by mainstream economics. The concept of institution is the product of an interdisciplinary approach providing organizational and behavioral connection between economic theory and economic institutions and giving the economics the lost opportunity to question the political economics.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, S. S. (2016). The Visible Hand of Economics: Institutional Chance Performance and Sustainable Institutional Development. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 29, 73–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/139531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Acemoğlu, D.S. & J. Robinson (2002), “Reversal of Furtune Geography and Institutions in Making of Modern Income Distribution”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1231-1294.
  2. Acemoğlu, D.S. & J. Robinson & Y. Thaicharoen (2003), “Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Syptoms. Volatility, Crises and Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123.
  3. Acemoğlu, D.S. & J. Robinson (2012),
  4. Ulusların Düşüşü, Güç Zenginlik ve Yoksulluğun Kökenleri, Çev. F.R. Velioğlu, Doğan Kitapevi. Aoki, M. (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analyisis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres. Azfar, O. (2002), “The NIE Approach to Economic Development: An Analytical Primer”, Forum 1. Introductory Session on NIE, The Irish Centre, Departmant of Economics, Univercity of Maryland, Collage Park, January 11. Brunner, K. (1992), “Ronald Coase: Old Fashioned Schooler”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(1), Cambridge, MA, Cheung, S. (1970), “The Structure of A Contract and Theory of A Non Exclusive Resource”, Journal of Law and Economics, XIII (1970), 49-70.
  5. Coase, R.H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, New Series, 4(16), 386-405.
  6. Coase, R.H. (1984), “The New Institutional Economics”, Journal of Institutional and Theorical Economics, 140, 229-231.
  7. Coase, R.H. (1994),
  8. Essays on Economics and Economists, The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Coase, R.H. (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
  10. Coase, R.H. (1988),
  11. The Firm, The Market and The Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Coase R.H. (1992), “The Institutional Structure of Production”, The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713-719.
  13. Cornes, R. & T. Sandler (1986),
  14. The Theory of Externalities, Cambridge Unv. Press.
  15. Cohen, J.M. (1996), “Ethnicity, Foreign Aid and Economic Growth in Sub Saharam Africa: The Case of Kenya”, HIID Development Discussion Paper, No. 520. Davis, L.E. & D.C. North (1971), Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press,
  16. Chambridge. De Alessi, L. (1987), “Nature and Methodological Foundations of Some Recent Extensions of Economic Theory in Economic Imperialism”, in: Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics, eds. G. Radnitzky & P. Bernholz, New York: Paragon House, 51-76.
  17. De Alessi, L. (1993), “Property Rights, Transaction Costs and X Efficiency, An Essay in Economic Theory”, American Economic Review, 3(1), 64-81.
  18. Denzau, A. & D.C. North (1994), ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyk