Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 40

Discussions on the Chance of Success and Efficiency of Fiscal Decentralisation

Mali Yerelleşmenin Başarı Şansı ve Etkinliği Tartışmaları

Pages
165–184
Publication Date
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the adoption of differentiating political and economic problems and solutions for different economies, the article can reach significant results for developed countries in terms of decentralization and fiscal decentralization, it is not possible to make the same assessment for developing countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, empirical analyzes are conducted to discuss the chance of success and efficiency of fiscal decentralization, which is a dimension of decentralization, with the changing world and the changing state and scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, empirical analyzes are conducted to discuss the chance of success and efficiency of fiscal decentralization, which is a dimension of decentralization, with the changing world and the changing state and scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the adoption of differentiating political and economic problems and solutions for different economies, the article can reach significant results for developed countries in terms of decentralization and fiscal decentralization, it is not possible to make the same assessment for developing countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yerelleşme · Mali Yerelleşme · Etkinlik

Abstract

In this study, empirical analyzes are conducted to discuss the chance of success and efficiency of fiscal decentralization, which is a dimension of decentralization, with the changing world and the changing state and scale. With the adoption of differentiating political and economic problems and solutions for different economies, the article can reach significant results for developed countries in terms of decentralization and fiscal decentralization, it is not possible to make the same assessment for developing countries.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, değişen dünya ve değişen devlet anlayışının konumu ve ölçeklendirilmesiyle beraber yerelleşmenin bir boyutu olan mali yerelleşmenin başarı şansı ve etkinliği tartışması ampirik analizler üzerinden yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Farklı ekonomiler için ekonomi-politik sorunlar ve çözümlerin farklılaştığı kabulü ile yerelleşme ve mali yerelleşme konusunda gelişmiş ülkeler için anlamlı sonuçlara ulaşılabilirken, gelişmekte olan ülkeler için aynı değerlendirmede bulunmanın mümkün olmadığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, K. Ö. (2019). Discussions on the Chance of Success and Efficiency of Fiscal Decentralisation. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 40, 165–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/139451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adam, A. & D.D. Mantos & K. Pantelis (2013), Fiscal Decentralization and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from OECD Countries, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Ahmad, E. & G. Brosio (eds.) (2006),
  2. Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar. Barankay, I. & B. Lockwood (2006), “Decentralization and the Productive Efficiency of Government: Evidence from Swiss Cantons”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 5639, London. Bartolini, D. & S. Stossberg & H. Blöchliger (2016), “Fiscal Decentralisation and Regional Disparities”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No 1330, OECD Publishing, Paris. Bauman, Z. (2014),
  3. Küreselleşme ve Toplumsal Sonuçları, Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  4. Blöchliger, H. & D. King (2005), Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governments,, 25.09.2017.
  5. Blöchliger, H. (2013), “Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 1: How Fiscal Federalism Affects Long-Term Development”, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, (14), OECD Publishing, Paris. Boadway, R. & S. Dougherty (2018), “Decentralisation in a Globalised World: Consequences and Opportunities”, OECD Working Papers, 21, OECD Publishing. Bonefeld, W. & J. Holloway (2007), Küreselleşme Çağında Para ve Sınıf Mücadelesi, Otonom Yayıncılık. Boschmann, N. (2009), Fiscal Decentralisation and Options for Donor Harmonisation, DPWGLGD, Berlin. Brennan, G. & J. Buchanan (1980),
  6. The Power to Tax, Cambridge University Press.
  7. Brenner, N. (2006), Ölçeğin Sınırları? Ölçeksel Yapılaşma Üzerine Metodolojik Düşünceler, Praksis Yayınları.
  8. Carr, E.H. (1987-1996), Tarih Nedir?, İstanbul:
  9. İletişim Yayınları.
  10. Dougherty, S. & J. Kim (eds.) (2018), Fiscal Decentralisation and Inclusive Growth, OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies, OECD and KIPF, OECD Publishing, Paris. Dziobek, C. & C.G. Mangas & P. Kufa (2011), “Measuring Fiscal Decentralization - Exploring the IMF’s Databases”, IMF Working Paper 11/126, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Faguet, J.P. (2004), “Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia”, Journal of Public Economics, (88), 867-893.
  11. Filho, A.S. (2007), Kapitalizme Reddiye - Marksist Bir Giriş, Yordam Kitap. Fisman, R. & R. Gatti (2000), “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries”, Policy Research Working Paper 2290, World Bank, Washington, DC. Foucault, M. & N. Chomsky (2012), İnsan Doğası: İktidara Karşı Adalet, BGST Yayınları.
  12. Gaebler, T. & D. Osborne (1992), Reinventing Government: How the Entreprene