Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 47

Attitudes of Taxpayers towards the Reasons of and the Opinions on Tax Amnesty: Evidence from Kosovo

Mükelleflerin, Vergi Aflarının Nedenleri ve Vergi Afları ile İlgili Görüşlere Katılma Düzeyleri: Kosova Örneği

Pages
11–41
Publication Date
2021-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results from hypothesis testing, the main reasons for tax amnesty includes (i) reducing the workload of tax administration and judiciary, (ii) short-term public revenue growth, (iii) a new beginning for taxpayers who have shown discrepancies in tax compliance, and (iv) the use of tax amnesty as a tool for the programs political programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research presents the reasons for tax amnesty, and the positive and negative opinions towards tax amnesty from the perspective of taxpayers based on a comprehensive survey conducted with participants in the Republic of Kosovo.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Significant differences among survey results are evaluated by gender, age, education, and duration as taxpayer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results from hypothesis testing, the main reasons for tax amnesty includes (i) reducing the workload of tax administration and judiciary, (ii) short-term public revenue growth, (iii) a new beginning for taxpayers who have shown discrepancies in tax compliance, and (iv) the use of tax amnesty as a tool for the programs political programs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vergi Affı · Vergi Aflarının Nedenleri · Vergi Afları ile ilgili Görüşler

Abstract

This research presents the reasons for tax amnesty, and the positive and negative opinions towards tax amnesty from the perspective of taxpayers based on a comprehensive survey conducted with participants in the Republic of Kosovo. Significant differences among survey results are evaluated by gender, age, education, and duration as taxpayer. Hypotheses are tested with the IndependentSample t-test, One Way ANOVA, and Tukey Post Hock LSD tests. According to results from hypothesis testing, the main reasons for tax amnesty includes (i) reducing the workload of tax administration and judiciary, (ii) short-term public revenue growth, (iii) a new beginning for taxpayers who have shown discrepancies in tax compliance, and (iv) the use of tax amnesty as a tool for the programs political programs.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Kosova Cumhuriyeti’ndeki uygulanan vergi aflarının nedenleri ve vergi aflarına karşı mükelleflerin olumlu ve olumsuz görüşlerini tespitine yönelik yapılan araştırma sonuçlarına yer verilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, araştırma verileri ile ankete katılan mükelleflerin, vergi aflarının nedenleri ve vergi afları ile ilgili oluşturulan olumlu ve olumsuz görüşlere katılma düzeyleri arasında; cinsiyetlerine, yaşlarına, eğitim durumlarına ve mükellefiyet sürelerine göre bir farklılığın olup olmadığı tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma ile ilgili oluşturulan hipotezlerin testinde ise Bağımsız-Örneklem T-testi, Tek Yönlü Anova ve Tukey Post Hock LSD testleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, vergi aflarının temel nedenlerini tanımlamaktadır. Hipotez sonuçları, vergi affının temel nedenlerini ve gerekçelerini ortaya çıkarır; bunlar vergi idaresi ve yargı iş yükünün azaltılması, kısa vadeli kamu geliri artışı, vergiye uyum konusunda tutarsızlıklar gösteren ve sosyal ve politik programların uygulanmasında bir araç olarak affı kullanan vergi mükellefleri için yeni bir başlangıçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, Z., ABDURRAHMANİ, E. (2021). Attitudes of Taxpayers towards the Reasons of and the Opinions on Tax Amnesty: Evidence from Kosovo. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 47, 11–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/139438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Agustina, L. & Y. Gunawan & W. Chandra (2018), “The Impact of Tax Amnesty Announcement Towards Share Performance and Market Reaction in Indonesia”, Accounting and Finance Research, 7(2), 39-47.
  2. Alm, J. & M. Mckee & W. Beck (1990), “Amazing Grace: Tax Amnesties and Compliance”, National Tax Journal, 43(1), 23-37.
  3. Alm, J. & M.J. Vazquez (2009), “Do Tax Amnesties Work? The Revenue Effects of Tax Amnesties During the Transition in the Russian Federation”, Aeconomic Analysis & Policy, 39(2), 235-253.
  4. Andreoni, J. (1991), “The Desirability of a Permanent Tax Amnesty”, Journal of Public Economics, 45(1), 143-159.
  5. Aspa, D.R. (2017), “The Philippine Experience with Tax Amnesties”, NTRC Tax Research Journal, xxviii(5). 27-53.
  6. Baer, K. & E.L. Borgne (2008), Tax Amnesties: Theory, Trends and Some Alternatives, (First Edition b.). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund. Bayer, R. & H. Oberhofer & H. Winner (2014), “The Occurrence of Tax Amnesties: Theory and Evidence”, Working Papers in Economics and Finance, 6, 1-42.
  7. Borgne, E.L. (2006), “Economic and Political Determinants of Tax Amnesties in the U.S.A.”, International Monetary Fund Working Papers, 06(222), 2-13.
  8. Buckwalter, N.D. & N.Y. Sharp & J.H. Wilde & D.A. Wood (2014), “Are State Tax Amnesty Programs Associated with Financial Reporting Irregularities?”, Public Finance Review, 42(6), 774-799.
  9. Çetin, G. (2007), “Vergi Aflarının Vergi Mükelleflerinin Tutum ve Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 14(2), 171-187.
  10. Demir, M. & A. Eker (2017), “Muhasebe Meslek Mensuplarının Vergi Aflarının Etkinliğine Yönelik Görüşleri: Sivas İlinde Bir Araştırma”, International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(14), 237-248.
  11. Doğan, Z. & R. Besen (2008), Vergi Aflarının Mükellefler Üzerindeki Etkisinin Tespitine İlişkin Bir Araştırma, Ankara:
  12. Maliyet ve Hukuk Yayınları.
  13. Fisher, R.C. & J.H. Goddeeris & J.C. Young (1989), “Participation in Tax Amnesties: The Individual Income Tax”, National Tax Journal, 42(1), 15-27.
  14. Gerger, G.Ç. (2012), “Tax Amnesties and 2010 Tax Amnesty Evaluation in Turkey”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 2(3), 107-113.
  15. Kargi, V. & C. Yüksel (2010), “Türkiye’de Vergi Aflarinin Vergi Adaleti ve Mükellefler Üzerine Etkileri”, Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları, 54(1), 22-44.
  16. Kellner, M. (2005), “Tax Amnesty 2004/2005 - An Appropriate Revenue Tool?”, German Law Journal, 5(4), 339-346.
  17. Luitel, S. & S.R. Sobel (2007), “The Revenue Impact of Repeated Tax Amnesties”, Public