Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 30

Measuring the Extent of European State Aid Control: An Econometric Analysis of the European Commission Decisions

Pages
45–70
Publication Date
2016-11-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results suggest that aid with multiple objectives to achieve has both longer durations and higher amounts of budget.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper provides an analysis of the European Commission (EC) decisions on state aid control using data on 550 state aid cases approved by the EC between 1998 and 2009.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We measure the determinants of the duration of state aid, total budget of state aid and daily budget of state aid.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results suggest that aid with multiple objectives to achieve has both longer durations and higher amounts of budget.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This paper provides an analysis of the European Commission (EC) decisions on state aid control using data on 550 state aid cases approved by the EC between 1998 and 2009. We measure the determinants of the duration of state aid, total budget of state aid and daily budget of state aid. By using these imperfect proxies, we try to identify the extent of European state aid control. Our results suggest that aid with multiple objectives to achieve has both longer durations and higher amounts of budget. We also find that for some aid objectives or industries, the EC approves cases of aid with both longer durations and higher levels of budget. On the other hand, for some class of aid objectives and industries, there is a trade-off between duration and the level of budget to counter-balance the undesired effects. The interpretation of the results implies that the European state aid control, which once was originally intended to address concerns about export subsidies and strategic trade, recently puts more emphasis on market failures mostly associated with externalities and public goods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBUĞDAY, F. C., BROUWER, E. (2016). Measuring the Extent of European State Aid Control: An Econometric Analysis of the European Commission Decisions. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 30, 45–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/139382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Bree, A. (2003), “The new EC regulation on state aid for employment”, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 1, 51-58.
  2. Buts, C. & M. Jegers & T. Joris (2011), “Determinants of the European Commission’s state aid decisions”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 11, 399-426.
  3. Cameron, A.C. & P.K. Trivedi (2009),
  4. Microeconometrics using Stata, Stata Press.
  5. Carree, M. & A. Gunster & M.P. Schinkel (2010), “European antitrust policy 1957-2004: An analysis of commission decisions”, Review of Industrial Organization, 36, 97-131.
  6. Chindooroy, R. & P. Muller & G. Notaro (2007), “Company survival following rescue and restructuring state aid”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 24, 165-186.
  7. Cleves, M. & W. Gould & R.G. Gutierrez & Y.V. Marchenko (2008), “An introduction to survival analysis using Stata”, Stata Press.
  8. Collie, D.R. (2000), “State aid in the European Union”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 867-884.
  9. Collie, D.R. (2002), “Prohibiting state aid in an integrated market”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2, 215–31.
  10. Collie, D.R. (2005), “State aid to investment and R&D. European Economy”, Economic Papers, 231, 1–22.
  11. Friederiszick, H.W. & D. Neven & L.H. Roller (2003), “Evaluation of the effectiveness of state aid as a policy instrument”, Report to DG ECFIN. Friederiszick, H.W. & L.H. Roller & V. Verouden (2006), “European state aid control: an economic framework”, Handbook of Antitrust Economics, ed. Paolo Buccirossi, the MIT Press.
  12. Garcia, J. & D. Neven (2005), “State aid and distortion of competition: A benchmark model”, Working Papers 06/2005,
  13. HEI. Glowicka, E. (2008), “State aid and competition policy: the case of bailouts in the European Union”, PhD Dissertation, Humboldt University. Heidhues, P. & R. Nitsche (2006), “Comments on state aid reform – some implications of an effects- based approach”, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 1, 23-34.
  14. Jacquemin, A. & T. Nambu & I. Dewez (1981), “A dynamic analysis of export cartels: The Japanese case”, Economic Journal, 91, 685-696.
  15. Kaplan, E.L. & P. Meier (1958), “Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457-481.
  16. Levenstein, M.C. & V.Y. Suslow (2006), “What determines cartel success?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 43-95.
  17. Marquez, J. (1994), “Life expectancy of international cartels: An empirical analysis”, Review of Industrial Organization, 9, 331-341.
  18. Martin, S. & P. Valbonesi (2006), “The state aid game