SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 43

Fiscal Sociology and Veblen’s Critique of Capitalism: Insights for Social Economics and the 2008 Crisis

Mali Sosyoloji ve Veblen’in Kapitalizm Eleştirisi: Sosyal İktisat ve 2008 Krizi için Düşünceler

Ceyhun GÜRKAN
Pages
295–311
Publication Date
2020-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper concludes that fiscal sociology and Veblen’s sociological and critical institutional economics have the great potential to develop new insights into critical social economics and the fiscal crisis of the state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to review fiscal sociology and Veblen’s critique of capitalism with an eye to developing new insights for social economics and the 2008 crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article demonstrates how old and new strands of fiscal sociology and Veblen’s economic sociology can be employed to develop a comprehensive understanding of history, present conditions and future of neoliberalism as well as its current crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper concludes that fiscal sociology and Veblen’s sociological and critical institutional economics have the great potential to develop new insights into critical social economics and the fiscal crisis of the state.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mali Sosyoloji · Veblen · 2008 Krizi

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review fiscal sociology and Veblen’s critique of capitalism with an eye to developing new insights for social economics and the 2008 crisis. The paper adopts an interdisciplinary approach that blends history, political economy, politics, sociology, social philosophy, and ethics. The article demonstrates how old and new strands of fiscal sociology and Veblen’s economic sociology can be employed to develop a comprehensive understanding of history, present conditions and future of neoliberalism as well as its current crisis. The paper concludes that fiscal sociology and Veblen’s sociological and critical institutional economics have the great potential to develop new insights into critical social economics and the fiscal crisis of the state.

Özet

Bu yazı sosyal iktisada ve 2008 krizine dair yeni düşünceler geliştirmek üzere mali sosyolojiyi ve Veblen’in kapitalizm eleştirisini gözden geçirmektedir. Yazı tarihi, politik iktisadı, siyaset bilimini, toplumsal felsefeyi ve etiği harmanlayan disiplinlerarası bir yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Yazı mali sosyolojinin eski ve yeni tarzları ile Veblen’in iktisat sosyolojisinin neoliberalizmin tarihini, bugünkü koşullarını ve geleceğini ve ayrıca krizini anlamada nasıl kullanılabileceğinin yolunu göstermektedir. Çalışma mali sosyoloji ve Veblen’in sosyolojik ve eleştirel kurumsal iktisadının eleştirel sosyal iktisat alanında yeni düşünceler geliştirmek ve devletin mali krizi olgusunu incelemede güçlü bir potansiyel sunduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRKAN, C. (2020). Fiscal Sociology and Veblen’s Critique of Capitalism: Insights for Social Economics and the 2008 Crisis. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 43, 295–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/139364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Backhaus, J.G. (2004), “Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Contributions in the Area of Fiscal Sociology: A First Approximation”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 143-151.
  2. Blyth, B. (2013), Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Brown, W. (2015), Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, New York: Zone Books. Campbell, J.L. (1993), “The State and Fiscal Sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 163-185.
  4. Ebner, A. (2005), “Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and the Rationale of Government: An Outline of the Schumpeterian Theory of the State”, in: J.G. Backhaus (ed.), Essays on Fiscal Sociology, Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 77-101.
  5. Foucault, M. (2007),
  6. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Foucault, M. (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Geiselberger, H. (ed.) (2017),
  7. The Great Regression, Malden/Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Goldscheid, R. (1958 [1917/1925]), “A Sociological Approach to Problems of Public Finance”, in: R.A. Musgrave & A.T. Peacock (eds.), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 202-213.
  9. Koch, W. (1981), “Finanzsoziologie”, in G. Fischer (ed.), Handwörterbuch der Wirtschaftswissenschaft Band 3, Tübingen: J.C.B Mohr/Paul Siebeck, 97-106.
  10. Lemke, T. (2011), Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction, New York/London: New York University Press.
  11. Martin, W.I. & A.K. Mehrotra & M. Prasad (eds.) (2009), The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. McCaffery, E. (2009), “Where’s the Sex in Fiscal Sociology? Taxation and Gender in Comparative Perspective”, in: W.I. Martin & A.K. Mehrotra & M. Prasad (eds.), The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 216-236.
  13. Musgrave, R. (1992), “Schumpeter’s Crisis of the Tax State: An Essay in Fiscal Sociology”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, 89-113. O’Connor, J. (1973),
  14. The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin Press.
  15. Schabas, M. (2005),
  16. The Natural Origins of Economics, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
  17. Schumpeter, J. (1991 [1918]), “The Crisis of the Tax State”, in: R. Swedberg (ed.), Joseph A. Schumpeter: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 99-140.
  18. Schumpeter, J. (1950 [1942]),
  19. Capitalism, S