SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 35

Investigating the Presence of Fisher Effect for the China Economy

Çin Ekonomisi İçin Fisher Etkisinin Varlığının Analizi

Utku ALTUNÖZ
Pages
27–40
Publication Date
2018-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to result of study, the presence of fisher effect in China was supported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In economic science, Fisher effect is known as the long run relationship between interest rates and inflation rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to Fisher, when economy at the full employment, increase in inflation is fully reflects to the nominal interest rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to result of study, the presence of fisher effect in China was supported.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Interest Rate · Inflation · Fisher Effect

Abstract

In economic science, Fisher effect is known as the long run relationship between interest rates and inflation rates. According to Fisher, when economy at the full employment, increase in inflation is fully reflects to the nominal interest rates. Fisher equation is used to formulate the relationship between inflation and interest rates. Equation stands out the evidence about money growing, inflation and rates. In this study, the validity of fisher effect for China was tested over the period 1996:01 - 2015:03, the long run relationship between nominal interest rate and inflation rate was examined by using ARDL Bounds Testing Approach which was developed by Peseran et al. Before ARDL, theoretical background of Fisher Effect was explained. Following the literature survey, stationary situations were tested by Augmented Dickey Fuller unit root test. After that Autoregressive-Distributed Lag Bounds Test was applied on variables. According to result of study, the presence of fisher effect in China was supported.

Özet

Ekonomi biliminde Fisher Etkisi, uzun dönemli faiz ile enflasyon ilişkisi olarak bilinmektedir. Fisher’e göre, uzun dönemde milli gelir tam istihdam seviyesinde iken enflasyon oranında bir artış tamamen nominal faiz oranını etkileyecektir. Bu çalışmada, Çin için Fisher Etkisinin geçerliliği 1996: 01-2015: 03 dönemi için test edilmiştir. Nominal faiz oranı ile enflasyon oranı arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişki, Peseran ve arkadaşları tarafından geliştirilen ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı kullanılarak incelenmiştir. ARDL testi öncesinde Fisher Etkisi’nin teorik arka planı incelenmiştir. Literatür araştırmasının ardından Augmented Dickey Fuller birim kök testi ile seriler durağanlaştırılmış ve durağan serilere ARDL (Autoregressive-Distributed Lag Bounds) testi uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda Çin Ekonomisinde Fisher Etkisinin varlığına ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNÖZ, U. (2018). Investigating the Presence of Fisher Effect for the China Economy. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 35, 27–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/139316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akıncı, M. & Ö. Yılmaz (2016) “Enflasyon-Faiz Oranı Takası: Fisher Hipotezi Bağlamında Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Dinamik En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi”, Sosyoekonomi, 24(27), 33-35.
  2. Bayat, T. (2012), “Türkiye’de Fisher Etkisinin Geçerliliği: Doğrusal Olmayan Eşbütünleşme Yaklaşımı, Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 38, 47-60.
  3. Beyer, A. & A.A. Haug & W.G. Dewald (2009), “Structural Breaks, Cointegration and the Fisher Effect”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No: 1013. Belloumi, M. (2012), “The relationship between Trade, FDI and Economic growth in Tunisia: An application of autoregressive distributed lag model”, Presented at the 15th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Geneva, Switzerland. Carneniro, F.G. & J.A. Divino & C.H. Rocha (2002), “Revisiting the Fisher Hypothesis for the Cases of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico”, Applied Economics Letters, 9(2), 95-98.
  4. Chen, C. (2015), “‘Fisher Effect’ Theory and ‘Fisher Paradox’ in China’s Economy”, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 80-85, doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.310012 Cooray, A. (2002), The Fisher Effect: a review of the literature, Sydney, NSW: Macquarie Univ., Dep. of Economics, 1-25.
  5. Dritsakis, N. (2011), Demand for money in Hungary: An ARDL Approach, Department of Applied Informatics University of Macedonia Economics and Social Sciences. Dutt, S. & G. Ghosh (1995), “The Fisher Hypothesis: Examining the Canadian Experience”, Applied Economics, 27, 1025-1030.
  6. Eğilmez, M. (2015), Çin Ekonomisi,, 02.07.2016.
  7. Fama, E.F. (1975), “Short Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation”, American Economic Review, 65, 269-282.
  8. Fama, E. & M.R. Gibbons (1982), “Inflation, Real Returns, and Capital Investment”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 9, 297-324.
  9. Fisher, I. [1930] (1961),
  10. The Theory of Interest, New York: Macmillan. Garcia, M.G.P. (1993), “The Fisher Effect in a Signal Extraction Framework: The Recent Brazilian Experience”, Journal of Development Economics, 41, 71-93.
  11. Gujarati, D.N. (1999), Temel Ekonometri, (Trans. Ü. Şenesen & G.G. Şenesen), İstanbul,
  12. Literatür Yayınları.
  13. Gül, E. & S. Açıkalın (2007), “An Examination of the Fisher Hypothesis: The Case of Turkey”, Applied Economics, 99(1), 87-90.
  14. Hassan, A. & M. Hisham (2008), An Analysis of Growth and Inequality in Sudan: Cointegration and Causality Evidence (1956-2003), (March 2, 2008), Available at SSRN:, 21.09.2016.
  15. Hatemi, A. & M. Irandoust (2008), “The Fisher Effect: A Kalman Filter Approach to Detecting Structural Change”, Applied Economics Letters