Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 36

Education, Health, and Economic Growth Nexus: A Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis for Developing Countries

Eğitim, Sağlık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler için Bootstrap Panel Granger Nedensellik Analizi

Pages
125–144
Publication Date
2018-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings indicate that only in two of eight developing countries (Brazil and Mexico) there exists a significant and positive causality, running from education and health expenditure to economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper studies an empirical analysis of the causality between education expenditure, health expenditure, and economic growth for the selected eight developing countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey) over the period 1995-2012.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our findings indicate that only in two of eight developing countries (Brazil and Mexico) there exists a significant and positive causality, running from education and health expenditure to economic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the rest of the countries that we consider in this paper, no causality was found between these variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eğitim ve Sağlık Harcamaları · Ekonomik Büyüme · Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler

Abstract

This paper studies an empirical analysis of the causality between education expenditure, health expenditure, and economic growth for the selected eight developing countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey) over the period 1995-2012. For this purpose, we employ the Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality test. Our findings indicate that only in two of eight developing countries (Brazil and Mexico) there exists a significant and positive causality, running from education and health expenditure to economic growth. However, we found a significant but negative causality among education expenditure, health expenditure, and economic growth for Indonesia. For the rest of the countries that we consider in this paper, no causality was found between these variables.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Bootstrap Panel Granger nedensellik testini kullanarak seçilmiş sekiz gelişmekte olan ülke (Arjantin, Brezilya, Şili, Hindistan, Endonezya, Meksika, Güney Afrika ve Türkiye) özelinde eğitim ve sağlık harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini 1995-2012 dönemi için ampirik olarak analiz etmektedir. Ampirik bulgular, analize konu olan sekiz gelişmekte olan ülkeden yalnızca ikisinde (Brezilya ve Meksika) eğitim ve sağlık harcamalarından ekonomik büyümeye doğru anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir Granger nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu, birinde (Endonezya) ise eğitim ve sağlık harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasında anlamlı ancak negatif yönlü bir Granger nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Diğer ülkeler için ise eğitim ve sağlık harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasında herhangi bir Granger nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, H., KAYA, A., ALPASLAN, B. (2018). Education, Health, and Economic Growth Nexus: A Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis for Developing Countries. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 36, 125–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/139306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Agénor, P.-R. (2012),
  2. Public Capital, Growth and Welfare, Princeton University Press, Princeton: New Jersey. Ahmed, A. and Arends-Kuenning, M. (2006), “Do Crowded Classrooms Crowd Out Learning? Evidence from the Food for Education Program in Bangladesh”, World Development, Vol: 34, pp. 665-84.
  3. Albouy, V. and Lequien, L. (2009), “Does Compulsory Education Lower Mortality?”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol: 28(1), pp. 155-168.
  4. Arendt, J.N. (2005), “Does Education Cause Better Health? A Panel Data Analysis Using School Reforms for Identification”, Economics of Education Review, Vol: 24(2), pp. 149-160.
  5. Barro, R. (1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol: 106 (2), pp. 407-443.
  6. Barro, R. J. (1997), Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, MIT Press:
  7. Cambridge, Mass. Barro, R. and Lee, J-W. (1993), “International Comparisons of Educational Attainment”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol: 32(3), pp. 363-394.
  8. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995),
  9. Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill: New York. Behrman, J.R. (1996), “The impact of Health and Nutrition on Education”, World Bank Research Observer, Vol: 11(1), pp. 23-37.
  10. Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M. (1994), “The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Cross-Country Data”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol: 34, pp. 143-173.
  11. Bhargava, A., Jamison, D. T. L., Lau, J. and Murray, C. J. L. (2001), “Modeling the Effects of Health on Economic Growth”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol: 20(3), pp. 423-440.
  12. Bils, M., and Klenow, P. J. (2000), “Does Schooling Cause Growth”, American Economic Review, Vol: 90(5), pp. 1160-1183.
  13. Bleakley, H. (2007), “Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol: 122, pp. 73-117.
  14. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D. and Sevilla, J. (2004), “The Effect of Health on Economic Growth: A Production Function Approach”, World Development, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, pp. 1-13.
  15. Bloom, D. E. and Williamson, J. (1998), “Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia”, World Bank Economic Review, Vol: 12, pp. 419-455.
  16. Boccanfuso, D., Savard, L., and Savy, B.E. (2013), “Human Capital and Growth: New Evidences from African Data”, International Economic Journal, Vol: 27, No: 1, pp. 55-77.
  17. Breusch, T. and Pagan, A. (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics”, Reviews of Economics Studies, Vol: 47