Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48

A Convergence Analysis on the Investment Development Path Approach

Yatırım Gelişme Yolu Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Yakınsama Analizi

Pages
489–510
Publication Date
2021-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, these countries' investment development path curves exhibit a non-linear convergence behaviour, and therefore the convergence process is affected by macroeconomic shocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study, which examines whether the investment development path curves of the developed and developing countries show convergence behaviour in the 1970-2018 period, has two main objectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first is to analyse whether foreign direct investment eliminates the development differences between countries based on the investment development path approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, these countries' investment development path curves exhibit a non-linear convergence behaviour, and therefore the convergence process is affected by macroeconomic shocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yatırım Gelişme Yolu Yaklaşımı · Yakınsama Hipotezi · Doğrusal Olmayan Birim Kök Testleri

Abstract

This study, which examines whether the investment development path curves of the developed and developing countries show convergence behaviour in the 1970-2018 period, has two main objectives. The first is to analyse whether foreign direct investment eliminates the development differences between countries based on the investment development path approach. Using the non- linear unit root tests developed recently, the second is to investigate whether the convergence behaviour of the investment development path curves is affected by macroeconomic shocks. According to the findings, these countries' investment development path curves exhibit a non-linear convergence behaviour, and therefore the convergence process is affected by macroeconomic shocks.

Özet

Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelere ait yatırım gelişme yolu eğrilerinin 1970-2018 döneminde yakınsama davranışı gösterip göstermediğinin incelendiği bu çalışmanın iki temel amacı bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan birincisi, yatırım gelişme yolu yaklaşımından hareketle küreselleşme sürecinin temel araçlarından olan doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının ülkeler arasındaki gelişmişlik farklılıklarını ortadan kaldırıp kaldırmadığını analiz etmektir. İkincisi ise, son dönemlerde geliştirilen doğrusal olmayan birim kök testlerini kullanarak, yatırım gelişme yolu eğrilerinin yakınsama davranışının ortaya çıkan makroekonomik şoklardan etkilenip etkilenmediğini araştırmaktır. Elde edilen bulgular, söz konusu ülkelerin yatırım gelişme yolu eğrilerinin doğrusal olmayan bir yapıda yakınsama davranışı sergilediğini ve dolayısıyla yakınsama sürecinin makroekonomik şoklardan etkilendiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZGAN, Ş., CEYLAN, R., MOLLAVELİOĞLU, Ş. (2021). A Convergence Analysis on the Investment Development Path Approach. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48, 489–510. https://ajindex.com/articles/139300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Apergis, N. (2009), “Foreign Direct Investment Inward and Outward; Evidence from Panel Data, Developed and Developing Economies, and Open and Closed Economies”, The American Economist, 54(2), 21-27.
  2. Barro, R.J. (1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross Section Countries”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407- 443. Barro, R.J. & X. Sala-i-Martin (1992), “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251.
  3. Barry, F. & H. Görg & A. McDowell (2002), “Outward FDI and the Investment Development Path of a Late-Industrializing Economy: Evidence from Ireland”, Regional Studies, 37, 341-349.
  4. Bellak, C. (2001), “The Austrian Investment Development Path”, Transnational Corporations, 10, 107-134.
  5. Bernard, A.B. & S.N. Durlauf (1995), “Convergence in International Output”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(2), 97-108.
  6. Bierens, H.J. (1997), “Nonparametric Cointegration Analysis”, Journal of Econometrics, 77(2), 379-404.
  7. Buckley, P.J. & F.B. Castro (1998), “The Investment Development Path: the Case of Portugal”, Transnational Corporations, 7, 1-15.
  8. Canarella, G. & R. Gupta & S.M. Miller & T. Omay (2020), “Does real UK GDP have a Unit Root? Evidence from a Multi-Century Perspective”, Applied Economics, 52(10), 1070-1087.
  9. Ceylan, R. (2010), “Yakınsama Hipotezi: Teorik Yaklaşımlar”, Sosyoekonomi, 11(11), 47-60.
  10. Davies, R.B. (1977), “Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under the Alternative”, Biometrika, 64, 247-254.
  11. Dunning, J.H. (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production-Some Empirical Tests”, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.
  12. Dunning, J. H. (1981), “Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, No. 119, 30-64.
  13. Dunning, J.H. & R. Narula (1996), “The Investment Development Path Revisited: Some Emerging Issues”, içinde: J.H. Dunning & R. Narula (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments, Routledge, London, 1-41.
  14. Duran, J.J. & F. Ubeda (2001), “The Investment Development Path: A New Empirical Approach and Some Theoretical Issues”, Transnational Corporations, 10(2), 1-34.
  15. Enders, W. & J. Lee (2012), “The Flexible Fourier Form and Dickey-Fuller Type Unit Root Tests”, Economic Letters, 117(1), 196-99.
  16. Fonseca, M.R. & A. Mendoça & J. Passos (2007), “The Investment Development Path Hypothesis: Evidence from the Portuguese Case - A Panel Data Analysis”, Technical University of Lisbon, School of Economics