SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Opinions of Experts Working on Identification of Gifted Children in Early Childhood

Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Özel Yetenekli Çocukların Tanılanmasında Görev Alan Uzmanların Görüşleri

Oğuzhan Güler(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0003-3603-3691
Sevilay Canpolat(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0002-2356-3960
Murat Ökcü(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0002-3319-2550
Sezen Camcı(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA)0000-0002-5059-9168
Pages
494–506
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A number of recommendations were made in line with the opinions of the experts involved in identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the views of experts involved in the identification of gifted children in early childhood towards identification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 15 experts working in identification at Guidance and Research Centers (GRCs) in Gaziantep, Erzincan, Malatya, and İstanbul provinces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A number of recommendations were made in line with the opinions of the experts involved in identification.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:özel yetenek · erken çocukluk dönemi · tanılama

Abstract

This study aims to examine the views of experts involved in the identification of gifted children in early childhood towards identification. The study included 15 experts working in identification at Guidance and Research Centers (GRCs) in Gaziantep, Erzincan, Malatya, and İstanbul provinces. For this qualitative research study, a semi-structured interview form, created by the researchers in accordance with the aims of the research, was used to explore the views of experts involved in early childhood identification. The results of the expert opinions show that the participants defined special ability as above average performance, creativity, problem solving, quick comprehension, and learning. Participants emphasized the necessity of identification in early childhood in order to reveal potential and differentiate education programs. They emphasized the strengths and weaknesses of the tools used in identification. They revealed the problems experienced in the identification process especially in immigrant and refugee groups. They emphasized the effect of pre-test preparations and the opinions of families and teachers on the identification process. A number of recommendations were made in line with the opinions of the experts involved in identification.

Özet

Bu çalışma erken çocukluk dönemindeki özel yetenekli çocukların tanılanmasında görev alan uzmanların tanılamaya yönelik görüşlerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmaya Gaziantep, Erzincan, Malatya ve İstanbul illerindeki RAM’larda (Rehberlik Araştırma Merkezi) tanılamada görev alan 15 uzman katılmıştır. Nitel bir araştırma olarak kurgulanan bu çalışmada, erken çocukluk döneminde tanılamada görev alan uzmanların görüşlerini incelemek için araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Uzman görüşleri sonucunda ortaya çıkan bulgularda, katılımcılar özel yeteneği daha çok ortalamanın üzerinde performans gösterme, yaratıcı olma, problem çözme, hızlı kavrama ve öğrenme olarak tanımlanmışlardır. Katılımcılar özel yetenekli çocukların potansiyellerini ortaya çıkarmak ve eğitim programlarının farklılaştırılması açısından erken çocukluk döneminde tanılamanın gerekliliğine dikkat çekmişlerdir. Ayrıca tanılamada kullanılan araçların güçlü ve zayıf yönlerine de vurgu yapmışlardır. Özellikle göçmen ve mülteci gruplarında tanılama sürecinde yaşanan sorunları ortaya koymuşlardır. Test öncesi yapılan hazırlıklar ve tanılama öncesinde aile ve öğretmenlerden alınan görüşlerin tanılama sürecine olan etkisini vurgulamışlardır. Çalışma sonucunda tanılamada görev alan uzmanların görüşleri doğrultusunda birtakım öneriler getirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güler, O., Canpolat, S., Ökcü, M., Camcı, S. (2024). Opinions of Experts Working on Identification of Gifted Children in Early Childhood. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1435724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (92)

  1. Alemdar, M. (2009). Early childhood children determining the gifted parents, teachers and comparison of expert opinions. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Gazi Üniversity, Ankara.
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
  3. Assouline, S. G. (1997). Assessment of gifted children. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 89−108). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Aşık M, Zelyurt H, (2021). Investigation of parents’ views regarding the recognition and education of specially talented individuals in early childhood period. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 44-52 https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.05
  5. Bal Sezerel, B., (2020). Özel yeteneklilerin erken tanılanması. Sak. U. (Ed.), Üstün Yeteneklilerin Tanılanması (pp.147-166) içinde. Vize Akademi.
  6. Barkan, J. H., & Bernal, E. M. (1991). Gifted education for bilingual and limited english proficient students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500306
  7. Baron, I. S., & Leonberger, K. A. (2012). Assessment of ıntelligence in the preschool period. Neuropsychology Review, 22(4), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-012-9215-0
  8. Bildiren, A. (2017). Developmental characteristics of gifted children aged 0–6 years: parental observations. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1389919
  9. Bildiren, A., Gür, G., Sağkal, A. S., & Özdemir, Y. (2020). The perceptions of the preschool teachers regarding identification and education of gifted children. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 21(2), 329-356. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.572326
  10. Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. H. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900107
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Pegem Akademi.
  12. Callahan, C. M. (2017). Assessment of giftedness with culturally diverse students. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 69-83). Prufrock Press.
  13. Cao, T. H., Jung, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2017). Assessment in gifted education: A review of the literature from 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(3), 163-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17714572
  14. Chamberlin, S. A., Buchanan, M., & Vercimak, D. (2007). Serving twice-exceptional preschoolers: Blending gifted education and early childhood special education practices in assessment and program planning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 372-393.
  15. Clark, B. (2015). Growing up gifted (8th ed.) Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  16. Colombo, J. (1993). In/ant cognition: Predicting later intellectual functioning. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  18. Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Stewart, R. A. (2017). Twice-exceptional learners: Case studies of high ability students with ADHD. Prufrock Press.
  19. Cukierkorn, J. R., Karnes, F. A., Manning, S. J., Houston, H., & Besnoy, K. (2008). Recognizing giftedness: Defining high ability in young children. Dimensions of early childhood, 36(2), 3-13.
  20. Çetinkaya, Ç. & İnci, G. (2019). Teachers’ opinions on identifiying gifted and talented children at early childhood period. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(3), 959-968. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2130
  21. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
  22. Demirel Dingeç, Ş., & Kirişçi N. (2023). A critical review to gifted education in early childhood in Türkiye, Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 24(1), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1201131
  23. Ehrlich, V. Z. (1980). Identifying gitedness in the early years: From 3 throuh 7. In Ventura Count Superintendent of Schools (Ed.), Educating the preschool/primary gited and talented (pp. 3-22). Los Angeles CA.
  24. Eker, A. & Sarı, H. (2021). Comparision of grade levels on identification of gifted students according to experts’ opinions. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(2), 889-899. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.743586
  25. Erwin, J. O., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428197
  26. Fan, C. F. (2003). The gifted traits checklist for preschool children. Taipei: Dept. of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University.
  27. Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically 182 diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400302
  28. Ford, L., & Dahinten, V. S. (2005). Use of Intelligence Tests in the Assessment of Preschoolers. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (pp. 487–503). The Guilford Press.
  29. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
  30. Gear, G. H. (1978). Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Children Quarterly, 22(1), 90−97.
  31. Geiser, C., Mandelman, S. D., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Multitrait–multimethod assessment of giftedness: An application of the correlated traits–correlated (methods–1) model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937792
  32. Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., & Guerin, D. W. (2009). Issues in early prediction and identification of intellectual giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 43–56). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11867-003
  33. Gökdemir, S. (2017). The evaluation of gifted student's diagnostic process according to teacher, parents and student's ideas in our country. (Unpublished Master Thesis). T.C. Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.
  34. Grant A., & Morrissey, A. M. (2021). The young, gifted learner: What we know and implications for early educational practice. In Smith S.R. (Eds.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer.
  35. Gray, B. L. (1980). The young, gifted child: an overview. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED197 532.
  36. Gross, M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.
  37. Gross, M. U. (1999). Small poppies: Highly gifted children in the early years. Gifted and Talented International, 14(1), 13-19.
  38. Güçyeter, Ş. & Sak, U. (2020). Üstün yeteneklilerin tanılanmasında var olan güncel sorunlar ve çözümleri. Sak.U (Eds.), Üstün yeteneklilerin tanılanması (pp.185-201) İçinde, Vize Akademi.
  39. Hadaway, N., & Marek-Schroer, M. (1992). Multidimensional assessment of the gifted minority student. Roeper Review, 15(2), 73−77.
  40. Harrison, C. (2004). Giftedness in early childhood: The search for complexity and connection. Roeper Review, 26(2), 78-84.
  41. Hartas, D., Lindsay, G., & Muijs, D. (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY summer school: Emerging issues and future considerations. High Ability Studies, 19, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130801980265
  42. Hodge, K. A., & Kemp, C. R. (2006). Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 164–204. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2006-259
  43. International Test Commission. (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93-114.
  44. Johnsen, S.K., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (Eds.). (2022). Handbook on assessments for gifted learners: Identification, learning progress, and evaluation (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003285991
  45. Jolly, J. L. and Kettler, T. (2008). Gifted education research 1994-2003: A disconnect between priorities and practice. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 427- 446.
  46. Karadağ, F., (2022). Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Özel/Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar (Tanılama-Müdahale-Eğitim). Eğiten Yayınevi.
  47. Kettler, T., Oveross, M. E., & Salman, R. C. (2017). Preschool gifted education: Perceived challenges associated with program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217690228
  48. Leana-Taşcılar, Z. M. (2017). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin psikolojisine genel bakış. Leana-Taşcılar, Z. M. (Ed.), Özel yetenekli çocukların psikolojisi. (pp.1-34) içinde. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  49. Leana Taşçılar, Z. M. (2020). İki kez özel çocukların tanılanması. Sak.U (Eds.), Üstün yeteneklilerin tanılanması (pp.167-184) İçinde, Vize Akademi.
  50. Lohman, D. L., & Foley Nicpon, M. (2012). Ability testing and talent identification. In S. L. Hunsaker(Ed.), Identification: The theory and practice of identifying students for gifted and talented education services (pp. 283-335). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  51. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: a national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000106
  52. Marland, S.P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Vol. 1). Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. The U.S. Government Printing Office.
  53. McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Waterman, C. (2014). Combining scores in multiple criteria assessment systems: The impact of combination rule. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513794
  54. Merriam, S.B. (2013) Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  55. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publication.
  56. Milli Eğitim Bakalığı (2018). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm
  57. Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description–the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(52), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
  58. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2018). Gifted education in America: The historical development of policies and practices. Routledge.
  59. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. (2015). Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556531
  60. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
  61. Perleth, C., Lehwald, G., & Browder, C. S. (1993). Indicators of high ability in young children. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 283–310). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
  62. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  63. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Blei, S. (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 177–198). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_10
  64. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the gifted rating scales—preschool/ kindergarten form. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 19–29. https://doi:10.1177/0016986207311055
  65. Phelps, C., Brazzolotto, M., and Shaughnessy, M.F. (2023). Identification and teaching practices that support inclusion in gifted education. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(1), 1-9.
  66. Piechowski, M.M. (1992). Emotional development and emotional giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education (pp. 285- 305). Allyn & Bacon
  67. Pletan, M. D., Robinson, N. M., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1995). Parents' observations of kindergartners who are advanced in mathematical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(1), 30−44.
  68. Porter, L. (2005). Gifted young children (2nd ed.). Pen University Press.
  69. Pyryt, M.C. (2004). Pegnato revisited: Using discriminant analysis to identify gifted children. Psychology Science, 46, 342–347.
  70. Robinson A, Shore B. M. & Enersen D.L. (2007). Best practices in gifted educatıon: An evidence-based guide. Waco, Tx: Prufrock Press.
  71. Robinson, N. M., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2007). Social-emotional needs of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 348-365.
  72. Rogers, J. A. & Oppenheimer, S. (1991). Identifying minority kindergartners for placement of self-contained classrooms for girted first graders A: three year study. Unpublished manuscript.
  73. Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-Forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale AZ: Great Potential.
  74. Sankar–DeLeeuw, N. (2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 24(3), 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554174
  75. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children, 3rd ed San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
  76. Schofield, N.J. ve Hotulainen, R. (2004). Does all cream rise? The plight of unsupported gifted children. Psychology Science, 46, 379–386.
  77. Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-850
  78. Shaklee, B. D. (1992). Identification of young gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(2), 134−144
  79. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
  80. Sutherland, M. J. (2008). Developing the gifted and talented young learner. Sage
  81. Şenol, F. B. (2023). An investigation of the educational problems of gifted children in the preschool period according to the perspectives of mothers. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.933677
  82. Tarhan, S., & Kılıç, Ş (2014). Identification of gifted and talented student and models in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(2), 27–43.
  83. Tezcan, F. (2012). Perceptions of early childhood teachers towards young, gifted children and their education. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  84. Thorndike, R. L. (1940). “Constancy” of the IQ. Psychological Bulletin, 37(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061268
  85. Tunçeli, H. İ. & Zembat, R. (2017). The ımportance and assessment of early childhood development. The Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 3(3), 1-12. Türe, E. (2023). School administrators’meanings on curriculum: A transcendental phenomenology study. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi 12, 1006-1015. https://doi.org/10.51531/korkutataturkiyat.1351505
  86. Ünver, G. & Erdamar, G. (2015). Early childhood teachers’ contributions to curriculum development process in Turkey. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 215-234. Valler, E. C., Burko, J. A., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Branagan, A. M. (2016). The test authors speak: reporting on an author survey of the leading tests used in gifted assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(7), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916659209
  87. Vista, A., & Grantham, T. C. (2009). Transferability of norms and its implication in cross-cultural gifted education: Norming Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) in the Philippine public schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-009-9065-6
  88. Walsh, R. L., Hodge, K. A., Bowes, J. M., & Kemp, C. R. (2010). Same age, different page: overcoming the barriers to catering for young gifted children in prior-to-school settings. International Journal of Early Childhood, 42(1), 43–58. https://doi:10.1007/s13158-010-0004-8
  89. Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  90. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (12. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  91. Tunçeli, H. İ. & Zembat, R. (2017). The ımportance and assessment of early childhood development. The Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 3(3), 1-12.
  92. Ünver, G. & Erdamar, G. (2015). Early childhood teachers’ contributions to curriculum development process in Turkey. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 215-234.