SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 80

Scale for Identifying Overexcitability in Gifted Children: Reliability and Validity Study

Belgin Bağrıaçık(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA)0000-0001-7335-1432
Sait Burak Yılmaz(KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2916-0855
Oğuzhan Güler(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA)0000-0003-3603-3691
Duygu Mutlu Bayraktar(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA)0000-0002-2276-3768
Marilena Leana Taşcılar(İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1271-0371
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The CFA results demonstrated good fit: χ²/df = 1.856, RMSEA = 0.055, NFI = 0.85, IFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure the overexcitabilities of gifted individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants comprised 584 gifted students from Science and Art Centers across Turkey during the 2023-2024 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The CFA results demonstrated good fit: χ²/df = 1.856, RMSEA = 0.055, NFI = 0.85, IFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Overexcitability · gifted students · scale development

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure the overexcitabilities of gifted individuals. Participants comprised 584 gifted students from Science and Art Centers across Turkey during the 2023-2024 academic year. Data were gathered using the draft Overexcitability Areas Identification Scale (33 items) and a Personal Information Form. Validity was assessed through face, content, and construct validity, while reliability was determined using Cronbach’s alpha and item discrimination indices. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA and CFA) were performed on separate samples (300 for EFA, 284 for CFA). Following EFA, nine items were removed. The CFA results demonstrated good fit: χ²/df = 1.856, RMSEA = 0.055, NFI = 0.85, IFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91. The final 21-item, five-factor scale demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.83; McDonald’s Omega ω = 0.80) and validity for assessing the overexcitabilities of gifted middle school students. The results demonstrate that the instrument can serve as a reliable screening and support planning tool within SACs to identify overexcitability profiles of gifted students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bağrıaçık, B., Yılmaz, S. B., Güler, O., Bayraktar, D. M., Taşcılar, M. L., *, B. B. (2026). Scale for Identifying Overexcitability in Gifted Children: Reliability and Validity Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 16 Issue: 80. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1679500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (87)

  1. Akindipe, O. O. (2024). From intelligence to achievement: the role of the socio-cultural environment of underrepresented minority students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1495434 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1495434
  2. Alexopoulou, A., Batsou, A., & Drigas, A. (2020). Stress, anxiety & mental health problems in gifted adolescents. Psychologıcal Dısorders and Research, 3(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.31487/j.PDR.2020.03.03
  3. Al-Hroub, A., & Krayem, M. (2020). Overexcitabilities and ADHD in gifted adolescents in Jordan: Empirical evidence. Roeper Review, 42(4), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815264
  4. Al-Onizat, S. H. (2013). The psychometric properties of a Jordanian version of Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two, OEQII. Creative Education, 4(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.41008
  5. Bouchard, L. L. (2004). An instrument for the measure of Dabrowskian overexcitabilities to identify gifted elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800407
  6. Bouchet, N., & Falk, R. F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500404
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. (31th ed.). Pegem Akademi Publishing.
  8. Chang, H. J., & Kuo, C. (2013). Overexcitabilities: Empirical studies and application. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.010
  9. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. Continuum.
  10. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2016). A First course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  11. Çetin, A. (2019). Dikkat eksikliği, hiperaktivite bozukluğu ve üstün yetenekliliğe ilişkin ayırıcı davranışlar [Bildiri Sunumu]. Differential behaviors related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and giftedness [Paper presentation]. I. Uluslararası İktisat, İşletme ve Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi (ECONDER), Karabük, Türkiye.
  12. Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Little, Brown.
  13. Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness: Psychoneuroses and positive disintegration. Gryf Publications.
  14. Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development Oceanside.Dabor Sceince.
  15. Daniels, S., & Meckstroth, E. (2009). Nurturing the sensitivity, intensity, and developmental potential of young gifted children. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living With Intensity (pp. 33-56).
  16. Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
  17. De Bondt, N., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two applying Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) and multiple-group BSEM-based alignment with approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01963
  18. DeVellis, R. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  19. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  20. Falk, R. F., Lind, S., Miller, N. B., Piechowski, M. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1999). The Overexcitabilities Questionnaire-Two (OEQII). Institute for the Study of Advanced Development.
  21. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (2009). Building firm foundations: Research and assessments. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 239–259). Great Potential Press.
  22. Falk, R. F., Yakmaci-Guzel, B., Chang, A. H., Pardo, R., & Chavez-Eakle, R. A. (2008). Measuring overexcitability: Replication across five countries. In S. Mendaglio (Ed.), Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration (pp. 183–199). Great Potential Press.
  23. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd Edition). Sage Publications.
  24. Fiori, M., Vesely-Maillefer, A. K., Nicolet-Dit-Félix, M., & Gillioz, C. (2023). With great sensitivity comes great management: How emotional hypersensitivity can be the superpower of emotional ıntelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 11(10), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100198
  25. Fonseca, C. (2024). Emotional intensity in gifted students: Helping kids cope with explosive feelings (3th ed.). Routledge.
  26. Fung, W. K., & Chung, K. K. H. (2022). Overexcitabilities and creative potential in the kindergarten context: The mediating role of children's playfulness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(1):101197 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101197
  27. Gelbar, N. W., Cascio, A. A., Madaus, J. W., & Reis, S. M. (2022). A systematic review of the research on gifted individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(4), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211061876
  28. Gillioz, C., Nicolet-dit-Félix, M., & Fiori, M. (2023). Emotional intelligence and emotional hypersensitivity in gifted individuals. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020020
  29. Guthrie, K. H. (2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent perceptions of ıntensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2080-2101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598
  30. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  31. Harrison, G. E., & Van Haneghan, J. P. (2011). The gifted and the shadow of the night: Dabrowski's overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal of Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 669–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400407
  32. He W.J., Wong W.C., & Chan M.K. (2017). Overexcitabilities as important psychological attributes of creativity: A Dabrowskian perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.006
  33. He, W. J., & Wong, W. C. (2014). Greater male variability in overexcitabilities: Domain-specific patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 66(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.002
  34. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  35. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028075 International Test Commission (ITC). (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). Retrived from https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
  36. Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  37. Kaplan-Sayı, A. (2018). Gifted children and attention deficit disorder/hyperactivity relation. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.320229
  38. Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., Wiśniewska, E., & Forthmann, B. (2021). How is intelligence test performance associated with creative achievement? A meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020028
  39. Kılıç, A. F. (2022). Ölçek geliştirme sürecinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi [Exploratory factor analysis in scale development process]. In M. Acar Güvendir & Y. Özer Özkan (Eds.), Tüm yönleriyle ölçek geliştirme süreci [Scale development process in all aspects] (1st ed., pp. 69–126). Pegem Akademi.
  40. Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorób, J., Bedynska, S., Sliwinska, K., & Jastrzebska, D. (2014). ’Old wine in new bottles’? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the Big Five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.003
  41. Lind, S. (2001). Overexcitability and the gifted. The SENG Newsletter, 1, 3-6. Retrieved from http://sengifted.org/archives/articles/overexcitability-and-the-gifted
  42. Lysy, K. Z., & Piechowski, M. M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108(2), 267–320.
  43. Marcoulides, G., & Schumacher, R. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  44. Mendaglio, S. (2022). Overexcitability research: Implications for the theory of positive disintegration and the field of gifted education. SENG Journal: Exploring the Psychology of Giftedness, 1(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.25774/16cy-5b24
  45. Mendaglio, S., & Tillier, W. (2006). Dąbrowski’s Theory of positive disintegration and giftedness: Overexcitability research findings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320603000104
  46. Moon, J. H., & Montgomery, D. (2005). Profiles of overexcitabilities for Korean high school gifted students according to gender and domain of study. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 15, 1–10.
  47. Nelson, A. E., DeVellis, R. F., Renner, J. B., Schwartz, T. A., Conaghan, P. G., Kraus, V. B., & Jordan, J. M. (2011). Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 13(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3501
  48. Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 622–647. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8
  49. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (7th. ed.). Open University Press.
  50. Piechowski, M. M. (1999). Overexcitabilities. In Encyclopedia of Creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 325–334). Academic Press.
  51. Piechowski, M. M. (2008). Discovering Dąbrowskiʼs theory. In S. Mendaglio (Ed.), Dabrowskiʼs theory of positive disintegration (pp. 41–77). Great Potential Press.
  52. Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800207
  53. Piechowski, M. M., & Miller, N. B. (1995). Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Review, 17(3), 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553654
  54. Piechowski, M. M., & Wells, C. (2021). Reexamining overexcitability: A framework for understanding intense experience. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.) Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts & talents (pp. 63-83). Routledge.
  55. Piirto, J. (2004). Scottsdale. Great Potential Press.
  56. Piirto, J., & Fraas, J. (2012). A Mixed-methods comparison of vocational and ıdentified-gifted high school students on the overexcitability questionnaire. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211433792
  57. Piirto, J., Montgomery, D., & May, J. (2008). A comparison of Dabrowski's overexcitabilities by gender for American and Korean high school gifted students. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130802504080
  58. Pohlmann, J. T. (2004). Use and interpretation of factor analysis in the Journal of Educational Research: 1992–2002. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.1.14-23
  59. Rinn, A. N., & Reynolds, M. J. (2012). Overexcitabilities and ADHD in the gifted: An examination. Roeper Review, 34(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627551
  60. Roeper, A. (2009). The emperor has no clothes: Exquisite perception, stress, and the gifted child. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity: Understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 73–82). Great Potential Press.
  61. Seçer, İ. (2018). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL ile faktör analizi uygulamaları [Psychological test development and adaptation process: Factor analysis applications with SPSS and LISREL] (2nd ed.). Anı Publishing.
  62. Silverman, L. K. (2009). My Love Affair With Dabrowski’s Theory: A Personal Odyssey. Roeper Review, 31(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190902993912
  63. Siu, A. F. Y. (2010). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non-gifted school children in Hong Kong: Does culture make a difference? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790903503601
  64. Smith, S. J. (2006). The influence of gender and country of origin on the overexcitabilities of American and Korean high school students with high ability [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.
  65. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapisal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural Equation Modeling: Basic Concepts and Applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari, 3(6), 49–74.
  66. Sword, L. (2003). Gifted children: Emotionally immature or emotionally intense? Gifted, 123, 14-17.
  67. Sword, L. K., & Director, G. (2005). Emotional intensity in gifted children. Retrieved from https://giftedservices.com.au/
  68. Tavşancıl, E. (2019). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS] (6th ed.). Nobel Publishing.
  69. Tavşancıl, E., & Keser, H. (2002). İnternet kullanımına yönelik Likert tipi bir tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [The development of a Likert-type attitude scale towards internet use]. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000043
  70. Tieso, C. L. (2007). Patterns of overexcitabilities in identified gifted students and their parents: A hierarchical model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986206296657
  71. Tourreix, E., Besançon, M., & Gonthier, C. (2023). Non-cognitive specificities of intellectually gifted children and adolescents: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Intelligence, 11(7), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11070141
  72. Treat, A. R. (2006). Overexcitability in gifted sexually diverse populations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-413
  73. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135.
  74. Van den Broeck, W., Hofmans, J., Cooremans, S., & Staels, E. (2014). Factorial validity and measurement invariance across intelligence levels and gender of the Overexcitabilities Questionnaire-II (OEQ-II). Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034475
  75. Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
  76. Warne, R. T. (2011). An investigation of measurement invariance across genders on the Overexcitability Questionnaire–Two. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11414821
  77. Webb, J. T. (2008). Dabrowski’s theory and existential depression in gifted children and adults. In Eighth International Congress of the Institute for Positive Disintegration in Human Development, August (pp. 7-9).
  78. Webb, J. T., Amend, E. R., Webb, N. E., Goerss, J., Beljan, P., & Olenchak, F. R. (2005). Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults: ADHD, Bipolar, Ocd, Asperger’s, Depression, and Other Disorders. Great Potential Press.
  79. Wellisch, M. (2024). Giftedness and the overexcitability Rabbit-Hole Trap. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 33(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2024.0014
  80. Winkler, D., & Voight, A. (2016). Giftedness and overexcitability: Investigating the relationship using meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216657588
  81. Wirthwein, L., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Focussing on overexcitabilities: Studies with intellectually gifted and academically talented adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.041
  82. Wirthwein, L., Becker, C. V., Loehr, E. M., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Overexcitabilities in gifted and non-gifted adults: Does sex matter? High Ability Studies, 22(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2011.622944
  83. Wood, V. R., Bouchard, L., De Wit, E., Martinson, S. P., & Van Petegem, P. (2024). Prevalence of emotional, intellectual, imaginational, psychomotor, and sensual overexcitabilities in highly and profoundly gifted children and adolescents: A mixed-methods study of development and developmental potential. Education Sciences, 14(8), 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080817
  84. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The counseling psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  85. Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2002). Üstün yeteneklilerin belirlenmesinde yardımcı yeni bir yaklaşım: Dabrowski`nin aşırıduyarlılık alanları (A new approach to help in the identification of giftedness: Dabrowski`s hypersensitivity areas) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul University.
  86. Yakmaci‐Guzel, B., & Akarsu, F. (2006). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non‐gifted 10th grade students in Turkey. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600947002
  87. Yoon, Y. H., & Moon, J. H. (2009). A comparison of the overexcitabilities: In gifted and non-gifted Korean primary-school children. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(3), 585-602