SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48

Evaluation of the Factors Causing Informal Employment by DEMATEL Based Analytical Network Process Method

Kayıt Dışı İstihdama Neden Olan Faktörlerin DEMATEL Tabanlı Analitik Ağ Süreci Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi

Gözde KOCA
Özüm EĞİLMEZ
Suna GÜLER
Pages
249–270
Publication Date
2021-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that while “economic factors” prevail to be the foremost essential factors, “unemployment” is determined to be the most critical sub-factor among the macro factors that lead to informal employment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For many years, informal employment is an important problem in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Especially in recent years, various sanctions and incentives have been applied to prevent/reduce this problem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that while “economic factors” prevail to be the foremost essential factors, “unemployment” is determined to be the most critical sub-factor among the macro factors that lead to informal employment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kayıt Dışı İstihdam · Politika Yapıcılar · DEMATEL

Abstract

For many years, informal employment is an important problem in Turkey. Especially in recent years, various sanctions and incentives have been applied to prevent/reduce this problem. In this study, MCDM (Multiple Criteria Decision Making) methods are utilized to determine the factors that cause informal employment using expert opinions of five Social Security Supervisors working against informal employment in the Social Security Institution of Turkey. Specifically, DEMATEL (The Decision-Making Experiment and Evaluation Laboratory) is used to determine the relations of the factors with each other, and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) is used to determine the weights associated to the factors. The findings indicate that while “economic factors” prevail to be the foremost essential factors, “unemployment” is determined to be the most critical sub-factor among the macro factors that lead to informal employment.

Özet

Uzun yıllardır kayıt dışı istihdam Türkiye’nin önemli sorunlarından biridir. Özellikle de son yıllarda bu sorunun önlenmesi / azaltılması için çeşitli yaptırımlar ve teşvikler uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada kayıt dışı istihdama neden olan faktörler, ÇKKV (Çok Kriterli Karar Verme) yöntemleri ile Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu’nda kayıt dışı istihdamla mücadele eden beş sosyal güvenlik denetmeninin uzman görüşüne başvurularak incelenmiştir. Yöntem olarak faktörlerin birbirleri ile olan ilişkilerini belirleyen DEMATEL (The Decision Making Experiment and Evaluation Laboratory) ile bu ilişkileri kullanarak faktörleri ağırlıklandıran Analitik Ağ Süreci (AAS) kullanılmıştır. Kayıt dışı istihdama yol açan makro faktörlerden “ekonomik faktörler” en önemli ana faktör; “işsizlik” en önemli faktör olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCA, G., EĞİLMEZ, Ö., GÜLER, S. (2021). Evaluation of the Factors Causing Informal Employment by DEMATEL Based Analytical Network Process Method. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 48, 249–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/139280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aydemir, Ş. (1994), Türkiye’de Kayıt Dışı Ekonomi, Acar Matbaası, İstanbul.
  2. Casson, M. & M.G. Della & U. Kambhampati (2010), “Formal and informal institutions and development”, World Development, 38(2),137-141.
  3. Chong, A. & M. Gradstein (2007), “Inequality and informality”, Journal of PublicEconomics, 91(1-2), 159-179.
  4. Dam, M.M. & Ş. Ertekin & N. Kızılca (2018), “Türkiye’de Kayıt Dışı İstihdamın Boyutu: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 293-318.
  5. Dreher, A. & F. Schneider (2010), “Corruption and the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Analysis”, Public Choice, 144 (1), 215-238.
  6. Feld, L.P. & F. Schneider (2010), “Survey on the shadow economy and undeclared earnings in OECD countries”, German Economic Review, 11(2), 109-149. Fialová, K. & O. Schneider (2011), “Labor institutions and their impact on shadow economies in Europe”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5913). Fidan, H. & S. Genç (2013), “Kayıtdışı İstihdam ve Kayıtdışı İstihdama Etki Eden Mikro Faktörlerin Analizi: Türkiye Özel Sektör Örneği”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), 137-150.
  7. Fontela, E. & A. Gabus (1976), “The DEMATEL Observer”, DEMATEL 1976
  8. Report, Battelle Geneva Research Center, Switzerland, Geneva. Frey, B.S. & H. Weck (1983), “Bureaucracy and the Shadow Economy: A Macro-Approach”, içinde: H. Hanusch (ed.), Anatomy of Government Deficiencies, Berlin: Springer, 89-109.
  9. Galiani, S. & F. Weinschelbaum (2012), “Modeling informality formally: house holds and firms”, Economic Inquiry, 50(3), 821-838.
  10. Harker, P.T. & L.G. Vargas (1987), “The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1403.
  11. Hazans, M. (2011), “Informal workers across Europe: Evidence from 30 European countries”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5912). Heritage Foundation (2011), The 2011 Index of Economic Freedom,, 14.02.2021.
  12. Hwang, B.-N. & N.-Y. Pai & C.-C. Lu & Y. Keny (2014), “The Design Decision of Online Game Development Based on a MCDM Model Combining Dematel with ANP Method”, Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 63(2), 486-498.
  13. Johnson, S. & D. Kaufmann & A. Shleifer & M.I. Goldman & M.L. Weitzman (1997), “The unofficial economy in transition”, Brookings papers on economic activity, 1997(2), 159-239.
  14. Johnson, S. & D. Kaufmann & P. Zoido-Lobatón (1998), “Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy”, The American Economic Re