Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 44

A Multivariate Investigation of Overall Happiness, Job Satisfaction and Income Satisfaction of Women and Men inTurkey

Türkiye’de Kadın ve Erkeklerin Mutluluk, İş Tatmini ve Gelir Tatmininin Çok Değişkenli Bir Analizi

Pages
11–26
Publication Date
2020-04-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper examines the factors affecting working women’s and men’s overall happiness, job satisfaction and income satisfaction levels and the association between these means of happiness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the factors affecting working women’s and men’s overall happiness, job satisfaction and income satisfaction levels and the association between these means of happiness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Women and men, who are satisfied with their workplace relations relative to those who are not, are more likely to report that they are satisfied or very satisfied with their life, job and income.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings support the spillover hypothesis: it is observed pairwise between all three components of happiness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve İstihdam · Mutluluk · İş Tatmini

Abstract

This paper examines the factors affecting working women’s and men’s overall happiness, job satisfaction and income satisfaction levels and the association between these means of happiness. Women and men, who are satisfied with their workplace relations relative to those who are not, are more likely to report that they are satisfied or very satisfied with their life, job and income. Women’s job and income satisfaction and men’s all three means of happiness are more likely to be high for those who received a pay rise last year. The strongest correlation is observed between job and income satisfaction for both women and men, which is slightly stronger for women that challenges the arguments on women’s financial motivation to be not as strong as men at work. Findings support the spillover hypothesis: it is observed pairwise between all three components of happiness.

Özet

Bu çalışma, çalışan kadınların ve erkeklerin yaşam, iş ve gelir tatmin düzeylerini etkileyen faktörleri Türkiye bağlamında irdelemekte ve bu öğeler arasındaki korelasyonu incelemektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, işyeri ilişkilerinden memnun olan kadınların ve erkeklerin yaşam, iş ve gelir tatmin düzeylerinin yüksek olma eğiliminin daha fazla olduğunu göstermiştir. Kadınların iş ve gelir, erkeklerin ise her üç mutluluk öğesi önceki sene alınan gelir artışından pozitif olarak etkilenmektedir. En yüksek korelasyon seviyesi kadınlar için biraz daha güçlü olmak üzere iş ve gelir tatmini arasında görülmüş, bu bulgu kadınların iş hayatında ekonomik kazanımlara erkekler kadar önem vermedikleri argümanının aksini desteklemiştir. Yayılma hipotezi üç mutluluk öğesinin tüm ikili kombinasyonlarında gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERT, A. E. (2020). A Multivariate Investigation of Overall Happiness, Job Satisfaction and Income Satisfaction of Women and Men inTurkey. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 44, 11–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/139273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Argyle, M. (2013),
  2. The Psychology of Happiness, Routledge. Aydıntan, B. & H. Koç (2016), “The Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: An Empirical Study on Teachers”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(10), 72-80.
  3. Bakan, İ. & T. Büyükbeşe (2013), “The Relationship between Employees’ Income Level and Employee Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7), 18-25.
  4. Bülbül, Ş. & S. Giray (2012), “İş ve Özel Yaşam (İş Dışı Yaşam) Memnuniyeti Arasındaki İlişki Yapısının Doğrusal Olmayan Kanonik Korelasyon Analizi ile İncelenmesi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(4), 101-14.
  5. Cappellari, L. & S.P. Jenkins (2003), “Multivariate Probit Regression Using Simulated Maximum Likelihood”, The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278-94.
  6. Chan, D. (2008), “So Why Ask Me? Are Self-Report Data Really That Bad?”, in: C.E. Lance & R.J. Vandenberg (eds.), Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity, and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, New York: Routledge, 309-36.
  7. Chiu, C. (1998), “Do Professional Women Have Lower Job Satisfaction than Professional Men? Lawyers As A Case Study”, Sex Roles, 38(7-8), 521-37.
  8. Clark, A. (1997), “Job satisfaction and Gender: Why Are Women So Happy at Work?”, Labour Economics, 4(4), 341-72.
  9. Clark, A. (1998), “Measures of Job Satisfaction: What Makes a Good Job? Evidence from OECD Countries”, OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 34. 13 August 1998. Paris: OECD Publishing,. Conway, J.M. & C.E. Lance (2010), “What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325-34.
  10. Çetinkaya-Bozkurt, Ö. & E.B. Bulgurcu-Gürel & A.M. Alparslan (2016), “Üniversite Çalışanlarında İş Yeri Arkadaşlığının İş Tatmini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkileri”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(37), 111-26.
  11. Çevik, N.K. & O. Korkmaz (2014), “Türkiye’de Yaşam Doyumu ve İş Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin İki Değişkenli Sıralı Probit Model Analizi”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 126-45.
  12. Demirel, E.T. & A. Yıldırım (2015), “Ücret Tatmininin Yaşam Tatminini Belirleyici Etkisi Var Mı? Elazığ Banka Çalışanları Örneği”, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 133-54.
  13. Dolan, S.L. & E. Gosselin (2000), “Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: Analysis of a Reciprocal Model with Social D