SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2

Evidence-Based Practices in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Tekrarlayan Gebelik Kaybında Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar

Melike Kahveci(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN SAĞLIĞI VE HASTALIKLARI HEMŞİRELİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-4459-4272
Sezer Er Güneri(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BÖLÜMÜ, KADIN SAĞLIĞI VE HASTALIKLARI HEMŞİRELİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-6097-841X
Pages
395–404
Publication Date
2025-08-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review was written to reveal evidence-based, current practices for the diagnosis, treatment and care of women experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the loss of two or more pregnancies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are risk factors for RPL such as the woman's age, previous pregnancy losses, chromosomal abnormalities, uterine anomalies, endocrine abnormalities, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and hereditary thrombophilia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review was written to reveal evidence-based, current practices for the diagnosis, treatment and care of women experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hemşirelik · kanıt · tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the loss of two or more pregnancies. There are risk factors for RPL such as the woman's age, previous pregnancy losses, chromosomal abnormalities, uterine anomalies, endocrine abnormalities, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and hereditary thrombophilia. RPL is a condition that creates physiological and psychological distress for women and their partners. Good-quality evidence on health care for individuals experiencing RPL is limited, and the lack of evidence puts clinicians in dilemmas about what to recommend to patients. There is controversy regarding recommendations for the investigation and management of RPL. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) has developed clinical practice guidance to provide clinical recommendations to improve the quality of healthcare provided to women experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss and their partners. Integrating evidence-based practices into nursing care, which is a professional profession, enables providing innovative patient care using the most up-to-date evidence. This review was written to reveal evidence-based, current practices for the diagnosis, treatment and care of women experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss.

Özet

Tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı (TGK), iki veya daha fazla gebeliğin kaybı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. TGK için kadının yaşı, önceki gebelik kayıpları, kromozomal anormallikler, uterus anomalileri, endokrin anormallikler, antifosfolipid sendromu (AFS) ve kalıtsal trombofili gibi risk faktörleri bulunmaktadır. TGK, kadınlar ve eşleri için fizyolojik ve psikolojik sıkıntı yaratan bir durumdur. TGK yaşayan bireylere verilen sağlık hizmetlerinde iyi kalitede kanıtlar sınırlıdır ve kanıt yetersizliği, klinisyenleri hastalara ne önerecekleri konusunda ikilemlere sokar. TGK'nin araştırılması ve yönetimi için öneriler konusunda tartışmalar mevcuttur. Avrupa İnsan Üreme ve Embriyoloji Derneği (ESHRE), tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı yaşayan kadınlara ve eşlerine sunulan sağlık hizmetinin kalitesini iyileştirmeye yönelik klinik öneriler sağlamak için klinik uygulama rehberi geliştirmiştir. Profesyonel bir meslek olan hemşirelikte kanıta dayalı uygulamaları hemşirelik bakımına entegre etmek en güncel kanıtları kullanarak yenilikçi hasta bakımı sunmayı sağlar. Bu derleme, tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı yaşayan kadınların tanı, tedavi ve bakımına yönelik kanıta dayalı, güncel uygulamaları ortaya koymak amacıyla yazılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kahveci, M., Güneri, S. E. (2025). Evidence-Based Practices in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2, 395–404. https://doi.org/10.53490/egehemsire.1393615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Abu-Baker, N. N., AbuAlrub, S., Obeidat, R. F., Assmairan, K. (2021). Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementations: A cross-sectional study among undergraduate nursing students. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-8. doi:10.1186/s12912-020-00522-x
  2. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ESHRE) (2020). Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 113(3), 533-535. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025
  3. Bender Atik, R., Christiansen, O. B., Elson, J., Kolte, A. M., Lewis, S., Goddijn, M. (2023). ESHRE guideline: Recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. Human Reproduction Open, 2023(1), hoad002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad002
  4. Chester, M. R., Tirlapur, A., Jayaprakasan, K. (2022). Current management of recurrent pregnancy loss. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 24(4), 260-271. doi:10.1111/tog.12832
  5. Emparanza, J. I., Cabello, J. B., Burls, A. J. (2015). Does evidence‐based practice improve patient outcomes? An analysis of a natural experiment in a Spanish hospital. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1059-1065. doi:org/10.1111/jep.12460
  6. ESHRE Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Guideline Development Group (2022). Guideline of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Erişim adresi: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Recurrent-pregnancy-loss Erişim tarihi: 05.11.2023
  7. Fernández-Basanta, S., Movilla-Fernández, M. J., Coronado, C., Llorente-García, H., Bondas, T. (2020). Involuntary pregnancy loss and nursing care: A meta-ethnography. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1486. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051486
  8. Griffin, G., Ngulube, M., Farrell, V., Hauck, Y. L. (2021). Caring for women through early pregnancy loss: Exploring nurses’ experiences of care. Collegian, 28(3), 268-274. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2020.08.011
  9. Kahveci, M., Kavlak, O. (2022). Tekrarlayan ektopik gebelik olgusunda yaşanan depresyon ve anksiyeteye yönelik verilen hemşirelik bakımının Stetler Modeli’ne uyarlanması. SBÜ Hemşirelik Dergisi, 4(2), 103-110. doi: 10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.1079553
  10. Moghbeli, M. (2019). Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss among Iranian population. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 7(9), e891. doi:10.1002/mgg3.891
  11. Musters, A. M., Koot, Y. E., van den Boogaard, N. M., Kaaijk, E., Macklon, N. S., van der Veen, F. Goddijn, M. (2013). Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Human Reproduction, 28(2), 398-405. doi:10.1093/humrep/des374
  12. Pillarisetty, L. S., Mahdy, H. (2022). Recurrent pregnancy loss. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing
  13. Radford, E. J., Hughes, M. (2015). Women's experiences of early miscarriage: Implications for nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(11-12), 1457-1465. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12781
  14. Stevens, K. R. (2013). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
  15. Tomkiewicz, J., Darmochwał-Kolarz, D. (2023). The diagnostics and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(14), 4768. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144768
  16. Turesheva, A., Aimagambetova, G., Ukybassova, T., Marat, A., Kanabekova, P., Kaldygulova, L. Atageldiyeva, K. (2023). Recurrent pregnancy loss etiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Fresh look into a full box. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(12), 4074. doi:10.3390/jcm12124074
  17. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması (TNSA) (2018). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Erişim adresi: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf Erişim tarihi: 05.11.2023
  18. Van Dijk, M. M., Kolte, A. M., Limpens, J., Kirk, E., Quenby, S., van Wely, M., Goddijn, M. (2020). Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 26(3), 356-367. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz048
  19. Musters, A. M., Koot, Y. E., van den Boogaard, N. M., Kaaijk, E., Macklon, N. S., van der Veen, F. Goddijn, M. (2013). Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Human Reproduction, 28(2), 398-405. doi:10.1093/humrep/des374
  20. Turesheva, A., Aimagambetova, G., Ukybassova, T., Marat, A., Kanabekova, P., Kaldygulova, L. Atageldiyeva, K. (2023). Recurrent pregnancy loss etiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Fresh look into a full box. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(12), 4074. doi:10.3390/jcm12124074