Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 36

REDEFINING THE CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND UZBEKISTAN

Pages
—
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In fact, these two countries follow their political interests and still collaborate in several fields that are considered to be prolific

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to have another look into Turkish-Uzbek relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For Uzbekistan, Turkey remains one of the most important trade partners and there are some fields of cooperation that could be developed between these fraternal countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, these two countries follow their political interests and still collaborate in several fields that are considered to be prolific
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dış Politika · İşbirliği · Orta Asya

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to have another look into Turkish-Uzbek relationship. Many critics appear once the affairs between Turkey and Uzbekistan are discussed. When the Soviet regime collapsed, the bilateral relations gained a sudden intensity at first and then lost acceleration somehow. Scrutinizing this process, we try to show that ups and downs in this relationship are not directly linked to these countries that do not even have common frontiers. For Uzbekistan, Turkey remains one of the most important trade partners and there are some fields of cooperation that could be developed between these fraternal countries. In fact, these two countries follow their political interests and still collaborate in several fields that are considered to be prolific

Özet

Sovyet rejiminin çökmesini müteakiben Orta Asya’da yoğun tempolu temaslar kuran Türkiye ile Özbekistan’ın kavuşması, geride kalan 20 yıllık süreçte kazanımlar kadar tatminkâr olmayan münasebetlerle de hatırlanmaktadır. Bu vetirede sadece karşılıklı çıkarların örtüştüğü değil; politik atmosferin soğuduğu yüzleşmeler de yaşanmıştır. Tamamen dostane ve pozitif ön kabullerle başlayan sürecin zamanla bir kördüğüme dönüşmesi, her iki taraf için de yitirilmiş bir avantajlar dünyası anlamına gelmektedir. Şüphe yok ki beklenti ve çıkarlar, ikili münasebetlerin doğasına tesir etmektedir. Bu makale; gelinen noktada iki ülke arasında yaşanan kırılma noktalarından yola çıkarak; ilişkilerin normalleşmesi adına uygulanabilecek yeni alternatiflerin neler olabileceği yönünde bir fikir vermeyi amaçlamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

Alimukhamedov, F., Akçay, E. (2013). REDEFINING THE CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND UZBEKISTAN. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 36. https://ajindex.com/articles/1387531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Abazov, Rafis, (1998), “Central Asian Republics' Search For a Model of Development”, http://src- slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/61/rafis/rafis1.html, 23.08.2012. Akhmadov, http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/5521, 29.07.2012. (2011), “Turkish Businesses Under Fire in Uzbekistan”,
  2. Akşam, ‘Özbekistan-Türkiye İlişkileri yeni sürece giriyor’, http://www.aksam.com.tr/guncel/ozbekistan-turkiye- iliskileri-yeni-surece-giriyor/haber-155250, 19.12.2012
  3. Başyurt, Erhan, (2012), “Özbekistan’da Kaybolan Yılların Peşinde”, Aksiyon, Sayı: 473, 29 November – 4 January, 200
  4. Bloomberg, (2013), ‘China Eclipses U.S as Biggest Trading Nation’, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02- 09/china-passes-u-s-to-become-the-world-s-biggest-trading-nation.html, 10.02.2013
  5. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, (1992), http://lex.uz/Pages/GetAct.aspx?lact_id=35869, 10.03.2013
  6. Demirtepe, Turgut, (2012), “Özbekistan-Tacikistan Soğuk Savaşı”, Analist, Volume: 17, July 2012, pp. 48-51.
  7. Demirtepe, Turgut, (2012). ‘Özbekistan-Türkiye İlşkilerinde Yeni Başlabgıç Umudu’, Analist, Volume 22, 2012, Devlet, http://www.scribd.com/doc/77257877/Turkey-and-Uzbekistan-A-Failing-Strategic-Partnership, 02012. “Turkey and Uzbekistan: A Failing Strategic Partnership”, Erişim Tarihi:
  8. Eurasianet, (2012), “Uzbekistan: Tashkent Takes Hardline Approach on Containing Turkish Soft Power”, http://www.eurasianet.org/node/65217, Erişim Tarihi: 11.07.2012.
  9. Gianotta, Valeria, (2012), “Turkish Foreign Policy Evolution and Goals under the AKP Government”, http://www.balkanalysis.com/turkey/2012/01/19/turkish-foreign-policy-evolution-and-goals-under-the-akp- government/, 22.08.2012.
  10. Haber 7, ‘İstanbul’da Özgür Özbekistan Konferansı’, http://www.haber7.com/guncel/haber/868567-istanbulda-ozgur- ozbekistan-konferansi, 23.04.2012
  11. HEYWOOD, Andrew, (2012), Political Ideologies, Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
  12. Hurriyet Daily News, ‘Uzbekistan Turkey to work on Security’, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/uzbekistan- turkey-to-work-on-security.aspx?pageID=238&nID=14621&NewsCatID=338, 25.02.2012
  13. Hürriyet, ‘Özbekistan cezaevinde 50 ye yakın Türk işadamı’, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/20963303.asp, 02012
  14. Internet Haber, ‘Bakan Ertuğrul Günay Özbekistan’da, http://www.internethaber.com/kultur-ve-turizm-bakanligi- ertugrul-gunay-ozbekistan--472860h.htm, 31.10.2012 Laçiner, Sedat, http://www.usakgundem.com/yazar/494/t%C3%BCrkiye-%C3%B6zbekistan-iliskileri-kriz-nasil-asilir.html, “Türkiye-Özbekistan 002012. (2006), İlişkileri: Kriz Nasıl Aşılır?”,
  15. Laçiner, Sedat, (2009), “Turgut Özal Period in Turkish Foreign Policy: Özalism”, USAK Yearbook of International
  16. Politics and Law, Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 153-205.
  17. Laruelle, Marlene, Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire, John Hopkins University Press, 2008
  18. Markedonov, Sergey, (2012), ‘Uzbekistan: The End of the Multi-vector Foreign Policy?’, Center for Strategic and International Studies, http://csis.org/publication/uzbekistan-end-multi-vector-foreign-policy, 10.09.2012. Merdanoğlu, http://www.turansam.org/makale.php?id=106, Erişim Tarihi: 05.07.2012 (2008), “Türkiye-Özbekistan Siyasi İlişkileri”, MFA
  19. ‘http://mfa.uz/rus/mej_sotr/vneshnyaya_politika/, 09.03.2013 ‘Tseli I zadachi vneshnepoliticheskogo kursa Uzbekistana’
  20. MFA-TR, (2012), “T.C. Taşkent Büyükelçiliği”, http://taskent.be.mfa.gov.tr/Mission.aspx, 17.08.2012.
  21. Poujol, Catherine (1993), ‘ Ouzbekistan, an II de l’independence: un costat contraste’, Revue du monde musulman et du Mediterranee, N 68-69, pp, 163-169
  22. Saipov Zabikhulla, (2012), ‘New Foreign Policy Strategy Paper Codifies Uzbekistan’s Reluctance Toward Restrictive http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=39759&cHash=ad085ecf708a6bb94e0 The 642801365ed46, 10.08.2012 Jamestown Foundation,
  23. Spechler Rome Dina and Spechler Martin, (2010), ‘The Foreign Policy of Uzbekistan: sources, objectives and outcomes: 1991-2009’, Central Asian Survey, Vol.29, No 2, p. 159-170
  24. T.C. Yurtdışı Türkler ve Akraba Topluluklar Bakanlığı, ‘Başkan Yurtnaç Özbekistan’da işadamlarıyla bir araya geldi’, http://www.ytb.gov.tr/index.php/soydas-ve-akraba-topluluklar/630-2012111201.html, 12.11.2012.
  25. TİKA (2011) TİKA 2010 Faaliyet Raporu, http://store.tika.gov.tr/yayinlar/faaliyet-raporlari/faaliyet-raporu-2010.pdf, 002011.
  26. Tolipov Farkhod, (2012), ‘Uzbekistan’s New Foreign Policy concept: No base, no Blocks, but National Interest
  27. First’, Central Asia and Caucasus Institute Analyst, http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/5829, 05.09.2012 Uznews, http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=2&nid=16559, 18.08.2012. “Uzbekistan launches campaign against Turkish firms”,