SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Analysis Of Pedagogical Texts Prepared For Academic Turkish As A Foreign Language In Terms Of Academic Vocabulary

Burak Tüfekçioğlu(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8933-3850
Pages
405–425
Publication Date
2021-10-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When social science and engineering-health science vocabulary were compared in terms of vocabulary frequency and academic word’s frequency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the aim was to determine academic words in academic Turkish teaching sets, to describe the numerical and rational distribution of these academic words and to make a comparison between the vocabulary of engineering-health sciences and social sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Vocabulary units classified as social sciences, and engineering-health sciences were evaluated in terms of their percentages in their own categories, the most frequently used word types and conceptual features and to analysed the differences in usage between social and engineering-health science, Mann Whitney U test was adapted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When social science and engineering-health science vocabulary were compared in terms of vocabulary frequency and academic word’s frequency.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:vocabulary · academic Turkish · academic words

Abstract

In this study, the aim was to determine academic words in academic Turkish teaching sets, to describe the numerical and rational distribution of these academic words and to make a comparison between the vocabulary of engineering-health sciences and social sciences. Vocabulary units classified as social sciences, and engineering-health sciences were evaluated in terms of their percentages in their own categories, the most frequently used word types and conceptual features and to analysed the differences in usage between social and engineering-health science, Mann Whitney U test was adapted. The result of the study indicated that frequency of academic words’ usage (%7-%8) is lower than their use count; however, when the number of single uses were considered, in terms of developing comprehension and explanation skills, it is highly important. When social science and engineering-health science vocabulary were compared in terms of vocabulary frequency and academic word’s frequency.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tüfekçioğlu, B. (2021). Analysis Of Pedagogical Texts Prepared For Academic Turkish As A Foreign Language In Terms Of Academic Vocabulary. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 405–425. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.983626

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Mersinli, Ü. & Demirhan, U. U. (2017). A Frequency dictionary of Turkish core vocabulary for learners. Routledge Pub.
  2. Alipoor, R. & Jadidi, E., (2016). The Relationship between Iranian EFL Teachers’ Reflection and their Cognition about Vocabulary Teaching Style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 769 – 775, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.104
  3. Beach, K. D., Sanchez, V., Flynn, J. L. & O’Connor E. (2015). Teaching academic vocabulary to adolescents with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp: 36-44.
  4. Bonk, W. (2000). Second Language Lexical Knowledge and Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14-31. Doi: 10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
  5. Brezina, V. & Gablasova, D. (2013). Is There a Core General Vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List. Applied Linguistics 36(1), 1–23. Doi: 10.1093/applin/amt018
  6. Castro-García, D. (2017). Receptive vocabulary measures for EFL Costa Rican high school students. International Journal of English Studies, 17(2), 81–99. 10.6018/ijes/2017/2/265681
  7. Cheng, J. & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851.
  8. Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. Doi: 10.2307/3587951
  9. Demir, N. (2017). Temel Kavramlar [Basic Concepts]. In H. Pilancı (Eds.), Türkçe Biçim Bilgisi, (pp. 2-25). Anadolu Üniversitesi yayıncılık.
  10. Demir, N. & Yılmaz, E. (2012). Türk dili el kitabı [Turkic Language Handbook]. Grafiker Yayıncılık.
  11. Demirel, G. (2020). Akademik Türkçe derslerinin kapsamı ve uygulama örnekleri [A scope of academic Turkish lessons and examples]. In B. Tüfekçioğlu (Eds.), Akademik amaçlar için Türkçe öğretimi (pp. 89-100). Pegem Akademi.
  12. Enayat, M. J. & Derakhshan, A., (2021). Vocabulary size and depth as predictors of second language speaking ability. System 99(1), pp: 1-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102521
  13. Erkuş, A. (2017). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci. [Scientific research process for behavior sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık
  14. Escobar, G. P., Kalashnikova, M. & Escudero P. (2018). Vocabulary matters! the relationship between verbal fluency and measures of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 170, 177–189. 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.012
  15. Gardner, D. & Davies, M., (2014). A New Academic Vocabulary List, Applied Linguistics 35/3: 305–327.
  16. Green, C. (2019). Enriching the academic wordlist and Secondary VocabularyLists with lexicogrammar: Toward a pattern grammar ofacademic vocabulary. System 87(1), 1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.102158
  17. Heppt, B. & Stanat, P., (2020). Development of academic language comprehension of German monolinguals and dual language learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, July, pp: 1-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101868
  18. Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2007). Is There an "Academic Vocabulary"?, TESOL Quarterly, 41(2) pp. 235-253.
  19. İmer, K., Kocaman, A. & Özsoy, A. S. (2011). Dilbilim Sözlüğü [Linguistics dictionary]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Ünv. Yay.
  20. Jackson, H. (2016). Sözlükbilime giriş [Introduction to lexicography]. (Trans. Gürlek, M. & Patat, E.) Kesit Yay.
  21. Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal Of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 38-48. Doi: 10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11462.
  22. Karadağ, Ö. (2018). Dil eğitimi araştırmaları için bir değişken önerisi: Kelime hazinesi katsayısı [ A Variable Suggestion for Language Education Research: Vocabulary Coefficient]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(2), 532-537. Doi: 10.16916/aded.372078.
  23. Khani, R. & Tazik, K. (2013). Towards the Development of an Academic Word List for Applied Linguistics Research Articles. RELC Journal, 44(2) 209–232. Doi: 10.1177/0033688213488432
  24. Kocaman Gürata, E., & Durmuş. M. (2020). Özel amaçlı yabancı/ikinci dil öğretimi kapsamında akademik amaçlı Türkçenin yeri [The position of Turkish for academic purposes within the scope of foreign/second language teaching for specific purposes]. In B. Tüfekçioğlu (Ed.), Akademik amaçlar için Türkçe öğretimi, (pp. 41-66). Pegem Akademi.
  25. Koizumi, R. & In’nami, Y. (2013). Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 900-913. Doi: 10.4304/jltr.4.5.900-913.
  26. Lei, L. & Liu, D. (2016). A new medical academic word list: A corpus-based study with enhanced methodology. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22. 42-53. Doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.008
  27. Malmström, H., Pecorari, D. & Shaw, P., (2018). Words for what? Contrasting university students’receptiveand productive academic vocabulary needs. English for Specific Purposes, 50(1), 28-39. Doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.002.
  28. Masrai, A. & Milton, J. (2018). Measuring the contribution of academic and general vocabulary knowledge to learners' academic achievement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31(1), 44-57. Doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.006
  29. Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72(1), 23-36. Doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005.
  30. McLean, S., Stewart, J. & Batty, A. O. (2020). Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach. Language Testing, 37(3), 389–411. Doi: 10.1177/0265532219898380.
  31. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Nation, P. & Newton, J. (1996). Teaching vocabulary. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, (pp. 238-254). Cambridge University Press.
  33. Pecorari, D., Shaw, P. & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39. 59-71. Doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.004
  34. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. Doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921
  35. Skoufaki, S. & Petrić, B. (2021). Academic vocabulary in an EAP course: Opportunities for incidental learning from printed teaching materials developed in-house. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 71–85. Doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.002
  36. Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(1). 139-152, 10.1080/09571730802389975
  37. Topkaraoğlu, M. & Dilman, H. (2013). Sözcük geliştirme aktivitelerinin öğrencilerin sahip oldukları genel dil seviyeleri üzerindeki etkisi [Effects of studying vocabulary enhancement activities on students’ general language proficiency levels]. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi (BAED), 4(8), 15-29.
  38. Turkish Language Association, (2021, May). Current Turkish Dictionary. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  39. Turkish Language Association, (2021, May). Turkish Language Association Science and Art Terms Dictionary. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  40. Ülper, H. (2018). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenen öğrencilerin akıcı sözcük ve metin okuma becerileriyle kavrama becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of the Relationship between Word Reading Fluency and Text Reading Fluency of Students Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language]. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-11.
  41. Vongpumivitch, V., Huang, J-Y & Chang, Y-C. (2009). Frequency analysis of the words in the Academic Word List (AWL) and non-AWL content words in applied linguistics research papers. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 33–41. Doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2008.08.003
  42. Yang, M. N. (2015). A nursing academic word list. English for Specific Purposes 37(1) pp. 27–38. Doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2014.05.003
  43. Yılmaz, E. (2014). Temel Dil Bilgisi Terimleri Sözlüğü [Basic Grammar Dictionary]. Pegem Akademi.
  44. Zucker, T. A., Carlo M. S. Montroy, J. J. and Landry, S. H. (2021). Pilot test of the Hablemos Juntos Tier 2 academic language curriculumfor Spanish-speaking preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55. 179-192. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.009