SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Experimental Analysis and Finite Element Modeling of S-Core Sandwich Panel Composites Drop Impact Response

Hasan Murat Öztemiz(KAHRAMANMARAS ISTIKLAL UNIVERSITY, ELBİSTAN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-3609-3777
Şemsettin Temiz(INONU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-6737-3720
Pages
131–139
Publication Date
2024-03-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Impact load-bearing capability increases with varied core heights and array designs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sandwich panel composites have several applications in material technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sandwich panel composite material is constructed of stainless steel-316 for the top and bottom plates, aluminum 1050A-0 for the core, and DP-8405 acrylic adhesive for the binding element.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Impact load-bearing capability increases with varied core heights and array designs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Low-velocity drop impact test · Sandwich panel composites · Mechanical behavior

Abstract

Sandwich panel composites have several applications in material technology. The sandwich panel composite material is constructed of stainless steel-316 for the top and bottom plates, aluminum 1050A-0 for the core, and DP-8405 acrylic adhesive for the binding element. The impact behavior of S-core composite sandwich panels was examined using low-velocity drop impact tests and finite element models. Finite element models have been created to characterize the influence of composite element bending behavior on variations. The specific flexural modulus and strength of composite S-core sandwich structures are equivalent to those found in the literature for core structures. As a result, the minimum weight design served as a guideline for producing weight and density-efficient hybrid composite sandwich panels. The energy absorbed in the test findings rose between 15.15% and 30% as the core thickness grew and between 3.571% and 41.34% as the core arrays changed. Impact load-bearing capability increases with varied core heights and array designs.

Özet

Sandwich panel composites have several applications in material technology. The sandwich panel composite material is constructed of stainless steel-316 for the top and bottom plates, aluminum 1050A-0 for the core, and DP-8405 acrylic adhesive for the binding element. The impact behavior of S-core composite sandwich panels was examined using low-velocity drop impact tests and finite element models. Finite element models have been created to characterize the influence of composite element bending behavior on variations. The specific flexural modulus and strength of composite S-core sandwich structures are equivalent to those found in the literature for core structures. As a result, the minimum weight design served as a guideline for producing weight and density-efficient hybrid composite sandwich panels. The energy absorbed in the test findings rose between 15.15% and 30% as the core thickness grew and between 3.571% and 41.34% as the core arrays changed. Impact load-bearing capability increases with varied core heights and array designs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztemiz, H. M., Temiz, Ş. (2024). Experimental Analysis and Finite Element Modeling of S-Core Sandwich Panel Composites Drop Impact Response. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.1365978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. M.Ş. Adin, E. Kılıçkap, “Strength of double-reinforced adhesive joints, ” Materials Testing, Feb 23, 2021.DOI: 10.1515/mt-2020-0024
  2. H. Adin, B. Yıldız, M.Ş. Adin, “NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF FATIGUE BEHAVIOURS OF NONPATCHED AND PATCHED ALUMINIUM PIPES, ” European Journal of Technique (EJT), Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 60 – 65, 2021, DOI: 10.36222/ejt.893327
  3. M. Arslan, O. Güler, U. Alver, “ The investigation of the mechanical properties of sandwich panel composites with different surface and core materials’’. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(6),1062-1068, 2018
  4. S. Chen, X. Tan, J. Hu, S. Zhu, B. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Jin, L. Wu, “A novel gradient negative stiffness honeycomb for recoverable energy absorption,” Composites Part B: Engineering,Volume 2, 108745, 2021
  5. J. Cao, K. Cai, Q. Wang, J. Shi, “Damage behavior of a bonded sandwich beam with corrugated core under 3-point bending, Material Design Volume, ” 95, 165-172, 2016
  6. Y.Zhang, T. Liu, W. Tizani, “Experimental and numerical analysis of dynamic compressive response of Nomex honeycombs,” Composite Part B:Engineering, Volume 148, 27- 39, 2018
  7. X. Wu, H. Yu, L. Guo, L. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Chai, “Experimental and numerical investigation of static and fatigue behaviors of composites honeycomb sandwich structure,” Composite Structure, 165-172, 2019
  8. G. Xu, F. Yang, T. Zeng, S. Cheng, Z. Wang, “Bending behavior of graded corrugated truss core composite sandwich beams,” Composite Structure, 342-251, 2016
  9. T. Li, L. Wang, “Bending behavior of sandwich composite structures with tunable 3D-printed core materials,” Composite Structure, 46-57, 2017
  10. F.C. Potes, J.M. Silva, P.V. Gamboa, “Development and characterization of a natural lightweight composite solution for aircraft structural applications,” Composite Structures, 430-440, 2016
  11. J. Forsberg, L. Nilsson, “Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 759-777, 2006
  12. G. Qi, Y.L. Chen, P. Richert, L. Ma, K.U. Schröder, “A hybrid joining insert for sandwich panels with pyramidal lattice truss cores,” Composite Structures, 241, 112-123, 2020
  13. X. Lu, V.B.C Tan, T.E. Tay, “Auxeticity of monoclinic tetrachiral honeycombs,’’ Composite Structures, Volume 241, 112067
  14. K. Naresh, W.J. Cantwell, “Single and multi-layer core designs for Pseudo-Ductile failure in honeycomb sandwich structures,” Composite Structures, Volume 256, 113059, 2021
  15. S. Newstead, L. Watson, M. Cameron., “Vehicle Safety Ratings Estimated From Police Reported Crash Data: 2008 Update,” Monash University Accident Research Center Report, Melbourne, Australia, 280, 2008
  16. X.M. Xiang, G. Lu., Z.H. Wang, “Quasi-static bending behavior of sandwich beams with thin-walled tubes as core,” Int J Mech Sci, 55-62, 2015
  17. A. Petras, M.P.F. Sutcliffe, “Failure mode maps for honeycomb sandwich panels,” Composite Structure, 237-252, 1999
  18. Z. Sun, S. Shi, X. Hu, X. Guo, J. Chen, “Short-aramid-fiber toughening of epoxy adhesive joint between carbon fiber composites and metal sub- strates with different surface morphology,” Composite Part B Engineering, 38-45, 2015
  19. H. Adin, M.Ş. Adin, “Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites,” Materials Testing, March 16, 2022. DOI: 10.1515/mt-2021-2038
  20. H.B. Rachid, D. Noureddine, B. Benali, M.Ş. Adin, M.Ş., “Effect of nanocomposites rate on the crack propagation in the adhesive of single lap joint subjected to tension,” MECHANICS OF ADVANCED MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES; JUL 22 2023, DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2240319
  21. S.D. Pan, L.Z.Wu, Y.G.Sun, Z.G.Zhaou, “Fracture test for double cantilever beam of honeycomb sandwich panels,” Materials Letters, 62, 523-526, 2008
  22. Q. Qin, S. Chen, K. Li, M. Jiang, T. Cui, J. Zhang, “Structural impact damage of metal honeycomb sandwich plates,” composite, Volume 252, 112719, 2020
  23. Q.H. Qin, T.J. Wang, “Low-velocity impact response of fully clamped metal foam core sandwich beam incorporating local denting effect,” Composite Structures,Volume 96, 346-356, 2013
  24. X. Zhang, F. Xu, Y. Zang, W. Feng, “Experimental and numerical investigation on damage behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact,” composite structure, Volume 236, 111882, 2020
  25. J. Xiong, L. Ma, L. Wu, B.Wang, and A.Vaziri, “Fabrication and crushing behavior of low-density carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss structures,” Composite Structures, Volume 92, 2695-2702, 2010
  26. H.P. Wang, C.T. Wu, Y. Guo, E. Mark, A. Botkin, “Coupled meshfree/finite element method for automotive crashworthiness simulations,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(10- 11), 1210-1222
  27. J. Mei, J. Liu, W. Huang, “Three-point bending behaviors of the foam-filled CFRP X-core sandwich panel: Experimental investigation and analytical modelling,” Composite Structures, Volume 284, 11520, 2022
  28. V.S. Sokolinsky, H. Shen, “Vaikhanski L and Nutt SR., Experimental and analytical study of nonlinear bending response of sandwich beams,” Composite Structures, 60, 219-229, 2003
  29. A. Boukar, S. Corn, P. Slangen, P. Ieny, “Finite element modelling of low velocity impact test applied to biaxial glass fiber reinforced laminate composites,” International Journal of Impact Engineering 165,104218, 2022
  30. G. Belingardi, R. Vadori, “Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering 27, 213–229, 2002
  31. H. Yujia, M. Ming, Y. Siya, W. Kai, “Drop-weight impact behaviour of stitched composites: Influence of stitching pattern and stitching space,” Composites: Part A 172,107612, 2023
  32. D. Lee, B. Park, S. Park, C. Choi, J. Song, “Fabrication of high-stiffness fiber-metal laminates and study of their behavior under low-velocity impact loadings,” Composite Structures, 189, 61-69, 2018
  33. H. Liu, Y. Zhou, L. Chen, X. Pan, S. Zhu, T. Liu, W. Li, “Drop-weight impact responses and energy absorption of lightweight glass fiber reinforced polypropylene composite hierarchical cylindrical structures,” Thin-Walled Structures 184, 110468, 2023
  34. Aluminum 1050-O. https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=27 3c1ffbdc134a8292c704da3ee2ff35. Access date 18 August 2023
  35. Stainless steel-Grade316. https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=863. Access date 18 August 2023
  36. Stainless steel 316. https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=3a 413dabd215462da3408e6e8b761349. Access date 18 August 2023
  37. H.M. Öztemiz, Ş. Temiz, “Mechanical Behaviors Of Different Radii Of Curvature S-Shaped Core Sandwich Composites Subjected To Bending Load,” International Asian Congress On Contemporary Sciences-VI, Van-Türkiye, 200-207, 27-29 May 2022
  38. H.M. Öztemiz, Ş. Temiz, “Mechanical Behaviors Of Different Array With S-Shaped Core Sandwich Composites Subjected To Bending Load,” International Asian Congress On Contemporary Sciences-VI, Van-Türkiye, 208-216, 27-29 May 2022
  39. E.A. Alwesabi, B.H. Abu Bakar, I.M.H. Alshaikh, H.M. Akil,“Impact resistance of plain and rubberized concrete containing steel and polypropylene hybrid fiber,” Mater Today Commun, DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101640
  40. M. Sahan M, I. Unsal, “An Experimental Analysis for Impact Behaviour of Portland Cement Concrete Substituted with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Aggregate, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology,” Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47:2113–2130, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s40996-023-01052-7
  41. ACI 544.2R-89 (1999) Measurement of properties of fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Committee 544
  42. H. Adin, B. Yıldız, M.Ş. Adin, “NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF FATIGUE BEHAVIOURS OF NONPATCHED AND PATCHED ALUMINIUM PIPES, ” European Journal of Technique (EJT), Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 60 – 65, 2021, DOI: 10.36222/ejt.893327
  43. M. Arslan, O. Güler, U. Alver, “ The investigation of the mechanical properties of sandwich panel composites with different surface and core materials’’. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(6),1062-1068, 2018
  44. S. Chen, X. Tan, J. Hu, S. Zhu, B. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Jin, L. Wu, “A novel gradient negative stiffness honeycomb for recoverable energy absorption,” Composites Part B: Engineering,Volume 2, 108745, 2021
  45. X. Wu, H. Yu, L. Guo, L. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Chai, “Experimental and numerical investigation of static and fatigue behaviors of composites honeycomb sandwich structure,” Composite Structure, 165-172, 2019
  46. G. Qi, Y.L. Chen, P. Richert, L. Ma, K.U. Schröder, “A hybrid joining insert for sandwich panels with pyramidal lattice truss cores,” Composite Structures, 241, 112-123, 2020
  47. A. Boukar, S. Corn, P. Slangen, P. Ieny, “Finite element modelling of low velocity impact test applied to biaxial glass fiber reinforced laminate composites,” International Journal of Impact Engineering 165,104218, 2022