SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Effects Of Traditional Turkish Music Education On Voice Range Profile And Voice Quality

Ayşe Karaoğullarından(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, ADANA NUMUNE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF SURGICAL MEDICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF OTORHİNOLARYNGOLOGIC DISEASES)0000-0002-7120-4962
Ali Vefa Yücetürk(Privaty clinic)0000-0002-7944-1188
Pages
23–32
Publication Date
2022-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our research shows that traditional Turkish music education improved the singing voice improvements as much as with classical music

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim : The aim of this study; to investigate whether traditional Turkish music education is as effective on voice range profile and voice quality as classical music education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twenty volunteers in the Conservatory and 10 volunteers the Turkish Amateur Music Choir were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our research shows that traditional Turkish music education improved the singing voice improvements as much as with classical music
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quantative voice assesment · voice quality · voice range profile

Özet

Aim : The aim of this study; to investigate whether traditional Turkish music education is as effective on voice range profile and voice quality as classical music education. Methods: Twenty volunteers in the Conservatory and 10 volunteers the Turkish Amateur Music Choir were included in the study. Digital recordings of the subjects’ voices were obtained before and after 8 months of voice training. Voice recordings were analyzed with the Dr. Speech voice analysis program.Voice analysis results were compared between groups. Results: Voice range profile was found expanded as 3, 2, and 5 semitones in group 1 (29 to 32 semitones ), group 2 (30 to 32 semitones) and group 3 (23 to 28 semitones), respectively. The parameters of harmonic component of voice such as HNR, SNR, and NNE improved in all groups after voice training. GRBAS scores were normal in the conservatory group before training and improved following training in all groups, with the amateur group being the most obvious. When the alterations were compared between the groups, no significant differences were observed between the first and second conservatory groups, whereas a significant difference was observed between the amateur group and the first and second conservatory groups in seven parameters (amplitude tremor, HNR, SNR, NNE and GRBAS). Conclusion: This is the first study about the effects of traditional Turkish music education on subjective and objective parameters of the singing voice. Our research shows that traditional Turkish music education improved the singing voice improvements as much as with classical music

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaoğullarından, A., Yücetürk, A. V. (2022). Effects Of Traditional Turkish Music Education On Voice Range Profile And Voice Quality. Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 23–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/1380031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Wendler J. Singing and science. Invited lecture at the 7th Pan-European voice conference (PEVOC7), Groningen, August 28 to September 1, 2007. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP).2008;60(6), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1159/000170076
  2. Dos Santos, P., Vieira, M. N., Sansão, J., & Gama, A. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2019; 33(2), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.020
  3. Nowosielska-Grygiel, J., & Olszewski, J. The usefulness of the acoustic and the capacity analysis of singing voice. Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.2019;73(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1534
  4. Ma, E. P., & Yiu, E. M. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2006; 20(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.007
  5. Brown, W. S., Jr, Rothman, H. B., & Sapienza, C. M. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000; 14(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
  6. Svec, J. G., Sundberg, J., & Hertegård, S. Three registers in an untrained female singer analyzed by videokymography, strobolaryngoscopy and sound spectrography. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.2008;123(1),347–353. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2804939
  7. Van Lierde, K. M., D'haeseleer, E., Baudonck, N., et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(3), e115–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
  8. Costicova, N. D. Gagauz’s Trıo “Oglan” As The Brıghtest Example Of Gagauzıan Musıc Culture. İnönü University Culture and Art Journal.2017; 3 (1), 187-197. DOI: 10.22252/ijca.337024 (Turkısh)
  9. Sielska-Badurek, E. M., Sobol, M., Olszowska, K., et al. Contemporary Commercial Music Singing Students-Voice Quality and Vocal Function at the Beginning of Singing Training. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2018;32(6): 668–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.027
  10. Brown, W. S., Jr, Rothman, H. B., & Sapienza, C. M. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000;14(3): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
  11. Timmermans, B., De Bodt, M. S., Wuyts, F. L., et al., P. H. Training outcome in future professional voice users after 18 months of voice training. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP).2004;56(2): 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1159/000076063
  12. Van Lierde, K. M., D'haeseleer, E., Baudonck, N., et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(3): e115–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
  13. Lundy, D. S., Roy, S., Casiano, R. R., et al. JAcoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000;14(4): 490–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80006-5
  14. Heuillet-Martin, G., Danoy, M. C., Florentin, L., et all. Voir le "timbre" en voix chantée: éducation et rééducation [Seeing the timbre in the singing voice: training and retraining]. Revue de laryngologie - otologie – rhinologie.1990; 111(4): 365–370.
  15. Siupsinskiene, N., & Lycke, Effects of vocal training on singing and speaking voice characteristics in vocally healthy adults and children based on choral and nonchoral data. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(4): e177–e189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.010
  16. Wendler J. Singing and science. Invited lecture at the 7th Pan-European voice conference (PEVOC7), Groningen, August 28 to September 1, 2007. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP).2008;60(6), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1159/000170076
  17. Dos Santos, P., Vieira, M. N., Sansão, J., & Gama, A. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2019; 33(2), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.020
  18. Ma, E. P., & Yiu, E. M. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2006; 20(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.007
  19. Brown, W. S., Jr, Rothman, H. B., & Sapienza, C. M. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000; 14(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
  20. Van Lierde, K. M., D'haeseleer, E., Baudonck, N., et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(3), e115–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
  21. Costicova, N. D. Gagauz’s Trıo “Oglan” As The Brıghtest Example Of Gagauzıan Musıc Culture. İnönü University Culture and Art Journal.2017; 3 (1), 187-197. DOI: 10.22252/ijca.337024 (Turkısh)
  22. Sielska-Badurek, E. M., Sobol, M., Olszowska, K., et al. Contemporary Commercial Music Singing Students-Voice Quality and Vocal Function at the Beginning of Singing Training. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2018;32(6): 668–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.027
  23. Brown, W. S., Jr, Rothman, H. B., & Sapienza, C. M. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000;14(3): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80076-4
  24. Timmermans, B., De Bodt, M. S., Wuyts, F. L., et al., P. H. Training outcome in future professional voice users after 18 months of voice training. Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP).2004;56(2): 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1159/000076063
  25. Van Lierde, K. M., D'haeseleer, E., Baudonck, N., et al. The impact of vocal warm-up exercises on the objective vocal quality in female students training to be speech language pathologists. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(3): e115–e121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.004
  26. Lundy, D. S., Roy, S., Casiano, R. R., et al. JAcoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2000;14(4): 490–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80006-5
  27. Siupsinskiene, N., & Lycke, Effects of vocal training on singing and speaking voice characteristics in vocally healthy adults and children based on choral and nonchoral data. Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation.2011; 25(4): e177–e189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.010