Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Investigating the Performance of the Exploratory Graph Analysis When the Data Are Unidimensional and Polytomous

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results were discussed based on the existing literature and some suggestions were given for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The question of how observable variables should be associated with latent structures has been at the center of the area of psychometrics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this investigation, simulated data sets were used and three different conditions were manipulated: the sample size (250, 500, 1000 and 3000), the number of items (5, 10, 20) and internal consistency of the scale (α = 0.7 and α = 0.9).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results were discussed based on the existing literature and some suggestions were given for future studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:exploratory graph analysis · factor analysis · network psychometrics

Abstract

The question of how observable variables should be associated with latent structures has been at the center of the area of psychometrics. A recently proposed alternative model to the traditional factor retention methods is called Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA). This method belongs to the broader family of network psychometrics which assumes that the associations between observed variables are caused by a system in which variables have direct and potentially causal interaction. This method approaches the psychological data in an exploratory manner and enables the visualization of the relationships between variables and allocation of variables to the dimensions in a deterministic manner. In this regard, the aim of this study was set as comparing the EGA with traditional factor retention methods when the data is unidimensional and items are constructed with polytomous response format. For this investigation, simulated data sets were used and three different conditions were manipulated: the sample size (250, 500, 1000 and 3000), the number of items (5, 10, 20) and internal consistency of the scale (α = 0.7 and α = 0.9). The results revealed that EGA is a robust method especially when used with graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (GLASSO) algorithm and provides better performance in the retention of a true number of dimension than Kaiser's rule and yields comparable results with the other traditional factor retention methods (optimal coordinates, acceleration factor and Horn's parallel analysis) under some conditions. These results were discussed based on the existing literature and some suggestions were given for future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCU, A. (2021). Investigating the Performance of the Exploratory Graph Analysis When the Data Are Unidimensional and Polytomous. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/137251

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Barabási, A.-L., & Pósfai, M. (2016). Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Beard, C., Millner, A. J., Forgeard, M. J., Fried, E. I., Hsu, K. J., Treadway, M. T., Leonard, C. V., Kertz, S. J., & Björgvinsson, T. (2016). Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample. Psychological medicine, 46(16), 3359–3369. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002300 Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(9), 91-121. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
  2. Borsboom, D., & Molenaar, D. (2015). Psychometrics. In J. Wright (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Second ed. Vol. 19. pp. 418-422). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293. doi: 10.1037/h0046049 Cattell R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum. Chalmers, R.P. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06 Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika, 95(3), 759-771. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asn034 Cliff, N. (1988). The eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 276-279. Cohen J, (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. Lawrance Eribaum Association. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 DiFranza, J. R., Savageau, J. A., Rigotti, N. A., Fletcher, K., Ockene, J. K., McNeill, A. D., Coleman, M., & Wood, C. (2002). Development of symptoms of tobacco dependence in youths: 30 month follow up data from the DANDY study. Tobacco control, 11(3), 228–235. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.3.228 Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (