Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 55

The Association Between Person-Fit and Extreme Response Style

Kişi Uyumu ve Uç Yanıt Stili Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
27–45
Publication Date
2022-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that people who use the ERS were more likely to produce misfit response patterns.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Extreme response style (ERS) refers to a disproportionate preference for endpoint options in Likert type or rating scale items, regardless of their content.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ERS has the potential to deteriorate the fit of the measurement model in use.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that people who use the ERS were more likely to produce misfit response patterns.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:uç yanıt stili · kişi uyumu · madde tepki kuramı.

Abstract

Extreme response style (ERS) refers to a disproportionate preference for endpoint options in Likert type or rating scale items, regardless of their content. The ERS has the potential to deteriorate the fit of the measurement model in use. In the current study, it was proposed that the use of the ERS is one possible cause of aberrant response patterns. In the context of item response theory (IRT), aberrant response patterns are also known as misfit responses, and these patterns are investigated using person-fit statistics. Accordingly, the aim of this study was determined to investigate whether the ERS is associated with misfit response patterns. Using a convenient sampling method, personality data from 727 university students were collected for this aim using the Basic Personality Traits Inventory (BPTI). The findings revealed that people who use the ERS were more likely to produce misfit response patterns. The results were consistent for both the lower-tail and the upper-tail ERS use. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the ERS is one plausible reason for a person's misfit in the context of personality m. More in-depth analyses of the link between the ERS and person-fit are encouraged.

Özet

Uç yanıt stili (UYS), içeriği ne olursa olsun, Likert tipi veya derecelendirme ölçeği ile puanlanan maddelerde uç yanıt seçeneklerinin orantısız bir şekilde tercih edilmesini ifade eder. UYS, kullanılan ölçüm modelinin uyumunu bozma potansiyeline sahiptir. Mevcut çalışmada, UYS'nin kullanımının normal olmayan yanıt modellerinin olası bir nedeni olduğu varsayılmıştır. Madde tepki kuramı (MKT) bağlamında, normal olmayan yanıt örüntüleri aynı zamanda uyum göstermeyen yanıtlar olarak da bilinir ve bu örüntüler, kişi-uyum istatistikleri kullanılarak incelenir. Buna doğrultuda, bu çalışmanın amacı, UYS'nin uyum göstermeyen yanıt örüntüleri ile bağlantılı olup olmadığını araştırmak olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda uygun örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak Temel Kişilik Özellikleri Envanteri (TKÖE) ile 727 üniversite öğrencisinden veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, UYS'yi kullanan kişilerin uyum göstermeyen yanıt örüntülerini üretme olasılıklarının daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, hem alt uç hem de üst uç UYS kullanımı için tutarlıdır. Bulgulara dayanarak, UYS'nin kişilik ölçümü bağlamında kişi uyum göstermemesinin muhtemel bir sebebi olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. UYS ve kişi uyumu arasındaki bağlantının daha derinlemesine analiz edilmesi önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCU, A. (2022). The Association Between Person-Fit and Extreme Response Style. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 55, 27–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/393632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and individual differences, 40(6), 1235-1245.
  2. Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2001). Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation. Journal of marketing research, 38(2), 143-156.
  3. Brown, R. S., & Villarreal, J. C. (2007). Correcting for person misfit in aggregated score reporting. International journal of testing, 7(1), 1-25.
  4. Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and psychological measurement, 6(4), 475-494.
  5. Cronbach, L. J. (1950). Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design. Educational and psychological measurement, 10(1), 3-31.
  6. Dodeen, H., & Darabi, M. (2009). Person‐fit: relationship with four personality tests in mathematics. Research papers in education, 24(1), 115-126.
  7. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., and Williams, E. A. (1985) Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(1), 67-86.
  8. Embretson, S. E., Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ferrando, P. J. (2007). Factor-analytic procedures for assessing response pattern scalability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 481-507.
  9. Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Assessing inconsistent responding in E and N measures: An application of person-fit analysis in personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 718-722.
  10. Gençöz, T. & Öncül, Ö. (2012). Examination of Personality Characteristics in a Turkish Sample: Development of the Basic Personality Traits Inventory. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 194-216.
  11. Greenleaf, E. (1992). Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 328-351.
  12. Hurley, J. R. (1998). Timidity as a response style to psychological questionnaires. Journal of Psychology, 132, 201-210.
  13. International Test Commission (2014). ITC Guidelines for Quality Control in Scoring, Test Analysis, and Reporting of Test Scores. Available online at: http://intestcom.org (Accessed Novenber, 10, 2020)
  14. Jain, U., & Agrawal, L. (1977). Generality of extreme response style. Journal of psychological researches, 21, 67–72.
  15. Jorge N. Tendeiro, Rob R. Meijer, A. Susan M. Niessen (2016). PerFit: An R Package for Person-Fit Analysis in IRT. Journal of Statistical Software, 74(5), 1-27. for Statistical Com