Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 47

Thinking State Finance from the Perspective of State Theories

Devlet Maliyesini Devlet Teorileri Perspektifinden Düşünmek

Pages
119–140
Publication Date
2021-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within this context, the state and state finance approaches of Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann and Tilly are addressed, and examples of state fiscal policies and the social consequences of these policies are analysed in the conceptual framework of these approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the state finance discipline permeates all the spheres of the social structure and creates various effects, the impact of the state through state finance is usually analysed from a one-sided perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, the main purpose of this study is to revisit the state and state finance approaches of Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann and Tilly in order to understand the various dimensions of the social effects created by the state through state finance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within this context, the state and state finance approaches of Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann and Tilly are addressed, and examples of state fiscal policies and the social consequences of these policies are analysed in the conceptual framework of these approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Devlet · Devlet Maliyesi · Hegemonya

Abstract

While the state finance discipline permeates all the spheres of the social structure and creates various effects, the impact of the state through state finance is usually analysed from a one-sided perspective. In this regard, the main purpose of this study is to revisit the state and state finance approaches of Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann and Tilly in order to understand the various dimensions of the social effects created by the state through state finance. Within this context, the state and state finance approaches of Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann and Tilly are addressed, and examples of state fiscal policies and the social consequences of these policies are analysed in the conceptual framework of these approaches.

Özet

Devlet maliyesi disiplini, toplumsal yapının her alanına nüfuz edip, çok farklı etkiler yaratırken, devletin devlet maliyesi aracılığıyla yarattığı etki genellikle tek yönlü bir bakış açısıyla analiz edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmanın temel amacı, devletin devlet maliyesi aracılığıyla yarattığı toplumsal etkilerin çeşitli boyutlarını görmek için belirli sosyolojik metinleri tekrar gündeme almaktır. Yazıda, bu kapsamda Gramsci, Poulantzas, Mann ve Tilly’nin devlet ve devlet maliyesi yaklaşımları ele alınmış ve bunların sağladığı kavramsal çerçeve içerisinde mali politika örnekleri ve bunların toplumsal sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABUKAN, D., AĞDEMİR, Z. (2021). Thinking State Finance from the Perspective of State Theories. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 47, 119–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/136895

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Ağdemi̇r, Z. (2019), "Marx, Engels ve Vergiler", Fiscaoeconomia, 3(2), 111-128.
  2. Anter, A. (2014), Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State, Palgrave, Londra. Aydın, R. (2015), “Kitap İncelemesi: Siyasal İktidar ve Toplumsal Sınıflar”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 70(2), 471-483.
  3. Callinicos, A. (2009), Emperyalizm ve Küresel Ekonomi Politik, (Çev: İ. Ata), Phoenix, Ankara.
  4. Carnoy, M. (2001), Gramsci ve Devlet, (Çev. M. Yetiş), Praksis, 2, 252-278.
  5. Clarke, S. (1991),
  6. Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber, Macmillian, Londra. Clarke, S. (2004),
  7. The State Debate, Palgrave, Wiltshire. Davies, J.S. & A. Bua & M. Cortina-Oriol & E. Thompson (2020), "Why is austerity governable? A Gramscian urban regime analysis of Leicester", Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1), 56-74.
  8. Dumenil, G. & M. Löwy & E. Renault (2012), Marksizmin 100 Kavramı, (Çev: G. Orhan), Yordam Yayınevi,
  9. İstanbul.
  10. Gökçe, G. & O. Gökçe (2015), “Devlet Kapasitesi: Kavramın Kuramsal Çerçevesi, Bileşenleri ve Türkiye’nin Görünümü”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 17(2), 1-34.
  11. Gramsci, A. (2007), Hapishane Defterleri, (Çev: A. Cemgil), Belge Yayınları İstanbul.
  12. Gürkan, C. (2014), “Modern Devlet maliyesinin Oluşumu: Maliye Tarihine Alternatif Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 69(1), 43-76. Hali̇feoğlu, M. & M. Yeti̇ş (2013), “Gramsci, Sivil Toplum-Devlet İkiliği ve Kuramsal Kökenler”, Mülkiye Dergisi, 37(1), 163-188.
  13. Ikhsano, A. & J. Stellarosa (2015), "The Resistance of Hollywood Movie Hegemony in Indonesia: Gramscian Analysis on Indonesian Tax of Imported Movies", Journal of Film, Media and Communication, 1, 12-19.
  14. Ioannidis, Y. (2015), "The political economy of the distributional character of the Greek taxation system (1995–2008)", Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15(1), 77-96.
  15. İyiekici, B. (2011), “Nicos Poulantzas’ın Kuramında Olağanüstü Rejim Biçimleri”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
  16. Kiser, E. & J. Kane (2001), "Revolution and State Structure: The Bureaucration of Tax Administration in Early Modern England and France", American Journal of Sociology, 107(1),183-223.
  17. Lottholz, P. & N. Lemay-Hébert (2016), "Re-reading Weber, reconceptualizing state-building: from neo-Weberian to post-Weberian approaches to state, legitimacy and state-building", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(4), 1467-1485.
  18. Mann, M. (1992),
  19. State, War and Capitalism, Blacwell, Cambridge. Marx, K. & F. Engels (2004),