SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Volume: 50 Issue: 3

The effeets of dietary humate and probiotic supplementation on performanee of broiler

Broyler rasyonlanna humat ve probİyotİk ilavesİnİn performans üzerine etkileri

Sakine Yalçın(Ankara Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
Adnan Şehu(Ankara Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
E. Ebru Onbaşılar(Ankara Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı)
Tarkan Şahin(Ankara Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Hayvan Besleme ve Beslenme Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, A)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2003-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Feed consumptionper one kg live weightgain of groups during trial were determinedas 1.80, 1.80 and 1.81 kg, respectively.lt is concluded that the supplementationmagulatorcass yield of broilers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This experimentwas carried out to determine the effects of the usage of humate (farmagulatorin broiler rations on live weight gain, feed consumption,dryTM) and probiotic (protexin™)285 daily Ross PM3 broiler male chicks were used in this experiment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They were divided into one control group and two treatmentgroups each containing 95 chicks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Feed consumptionper one kg live weightgain of groups during trial were determinedas 1.80, 1.80 and 1.81 kg, respectively.lt is concluded that the supplementationmagulatorcass yield of broilers
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2098 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Broiler · carcassyield · humate

Abstract

This experimentwas carried out to determine the effects of the usage of humate (farmagulatorin broiler rations on live weight gain, feed consumption,dryTM) and probiotic (protexin™)285 daily Ross PM3 broiler male chicks were used in this experiment. They were divided into one control group and two treatmentgroups each containing 95 chicks. Each group was divided into five subgroups each containingsecOlıd treatmentgroups were supplementedperimental period lasted 42 days. At the end of the study there were no statistically differences among the groups in Iive weight, liveweight gain, feed consumption,groııps were found as 2152.8, 2098.1 and 2 i00.8 g, respectively during 42 days trial period. Feed consumptionper one kg live weightgain of groups during trial were determinedas 1.80, 1.80 and 1.81 kg, respectively.lt is concluded that the supplementationmagulatorcass yield of broilers

Özet

Bu araştırma, rasyonlarda humat (farmagülatördryTM) ve probiyotik (proteksin™)kullanımınınbroylerlerde canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi,yemdenyararlanmatırmada toplam 285 adet günlük ticari Ross PM3 erkek broyler civciv kullanılmıştır.kontrol, 2 deneme olmak üzere toplam 3 grup halinde yürütülmüştür.Grupların her biri 19 adet civciv içeren beş alt gruba ayrılmıştır.Birinci ve:ikirici deneme grupları rasyonlarınatırma 42 gün sürdürülmüştür.oranı ve karkas randımanı bakımından2. deneme gruplarında ortalama canlı ağırlık artışları sırasıyla 2152.8, 2098.1 ve 2100.8 g, bir kg canlı ağırlık artışı için tüketilen yemmiktarları ise sırasıyla1.80, 1.80 ve 1.81 kg olarak belirlenmiştir.teksin ™ ilavesinin canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve karkas randımanı üzerine olumsuz bir etkisi gözlenmemiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

Yalçın, S., Şehu, A., Onbaşılar, E. E., Şahin, T. (2003). The effeets of dietary humate and probiotic supplementation on performanee of broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 50 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. i. Alp M, Kahraman R, Kocabağlı N, Eren M, Şenel HS (1993): Lact!lerm-L5 ve bazı antibiyotiklerin broyler perfonnansı. abdominal yağ ve ince bağırsak ağırlığı ile kan kolesterolüne etkileri. İstanbul Üniv Yet Fak Derg, 19, 145-157.
  2. Anonim (1998): Protexin7M - Doğal verim arttırıcı. Novartis Sağlık, Gıda ve Tanm Ürünleri Sanayi ve Tic. A.ş.
  3. Anonim (2000): Our new humate-Humates in poultry and stock farming. http://www.organicapproach.com/humates/ Chapter9.htm.
  4. Anonim (2003): Animal feeds and veterinary medicine. Humin Tech. http://www.humintech@/humicacids. basedanimalfee- veterinarymedicineproducts.htm.
  5. AOAC (1984): Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14ıh ed, Arlington, Yirginia.
  6. Bailey CA, White KE, Domke SL (1996): Evaluation of Mene,lee Humate TM on the performance of broilers. Poultry Sci, 75 (Suppl i), 84.
  7. Dilworth BC, Day EJ (1978): Lactobacillus cultures in broiler diets. Poultry Sci, 57, 1101 (Abst).
  8. EMEA (1999): Humic acids and their sodium salts summary report. Committee for veterinary medicinal product. The European Ageney forthe Evaluation 'afMedicinal proc - ducts. EMEA/MRL/554/99-FINAL, 1999, London.
  9. Erdoğan Z (1999): Broyler rasyonlarında antibiyotik ve probiyotik kullanılması. Lalahan Hay Araşt Enst Derg, 39, 57-69.
  10. Anonim (2000): Our new humate-Humates in poultry and stock farming. http://www.organicapproach.com/humates/ Chapter9.htm.
  11. Anonim (2003): Animal feeds and veterinary medicine. Humin Tech. http://www.humintech@/humicacids. basedanimalfee- veterinarymedicineproducts.htm.