SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 57 Issue: 2

In vitro evaluation of principle spermatological parameters in different rabbit breeds

Farklı tavşan ırklarında başlıca spermatolojik parametrelerin in vitro değerlendirilmesi

Ongun Uysal(Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara, Türkiye.)
Çiğdem Çebi(Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara, Türkiye.)
Ömer Varışlı(Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara, Türkiye.)
Mehmet Borga Tırpan(Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara, Türkiye.)
Derya Dinçel(Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara, Türkiye.)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2010-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, differences among individuals and breeds for ejaculate volume (p<0.01), sperm motility (p<0.001), sperm concentration (p<0.001), dead sperm (p<0.001), sperm viability (p<0.001), and sperm pH (p<0.05) were found significant

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Semen was collected by artificial vagina using a doe as a dummy from 2 Californian, 2 New Zealand White (NZW) and 2 Blue Viena (BV), a total of 6 mature bucks throughout the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, no significant differences among individuals and breeds were determined for morphologic sperm abnormalities and sexual behavior (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, differences among individuals and breeds for ejaculate volume (p<0.01), sperm motility (p<0.001), sperm concentration (p<0.001), dead sperm (p<0.001), sperm viability (p<0.001), and sperm pH (p<0.05) were found significant
🔬Design:Letter to Editor
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blue Viena rabbit · Californian rabbit · New Zealand White rabbit

Abstract

Semen was collected by artificial vagina using a doe as a dummy from 2 Californian, 2 New Zealand White (NZW) and 2 Blue Viena (BV), a total of 6 mature bucks throughout the study. Principle spermatological parameters were evaluated in fresh semen. In this study, no significant differences among individuals and breeds were determined for morphologic sperm abnormalities and sexual behavior (p>0.05). But, differences among individuals and breeds for ejaculate volume (p<0.01), sperm motility (p<0.001), sperm concentration (p<0.001), dead sperm (p<0.001), sperm viability (p<0.001), and sperm pH (p<0.05) were found significant

Özet

Çalışma süresince, 2 Kaliforniya, 2 Yeni Zelanda Beyazı ve 2 Mavi Viyana ırkı toplam 6 erişkin erkekten bir fantom kullanılarak sun’i vajenle sperma alındı. Nativ spermalarda başlıca spermatolojik parametreler değerlendirildi. Bu çalışmada, bireyler ve ırklar arasında morfolojik spermatozoa anomalileri ve seksüel davranış yönüyle hiçbir farklılık saptanmadı (p>0.05). Fakat, ejakülat miktarı (p<0.01), spermatozoa motilitesi (p<0.001), spermatozoa yoğunluğu (p<0.001), ölü spermatozoa oranı (p<0.001), spermatozoa canlılığı (p<0.001) ve sperma pH’sı (p<0.05) yönüyle bireyler ve ırklar arasındaki farklılıklar istatistik açıdan önemli bulundu

🔖

Cite This Article

Uysal, O., Çebi, Ç., Varışlı, Ö., Tırpan, M. B., Dinçel, D. (2010). In vitro evaluation of principle spermatological parameters in different rabbit breeds. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 57 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alvarino JMR (2000): Reproductive performance of male rabbit. In: Proceedings of the Seventh World Rabbit Congress, vol. A, Valencia, Spain, pp. 13–35.
  2. Ax RL, Dally M, Didion BA, Lenz RW, Love CC, Varner DD, Hafez B, Bellin ME (2000): Semen evaluation. In: Reproduction in Farm Animals. Ed. B. Hafez and E.S.E. Hafez, chapter 25, 365-375.
  3. Crews D (1993): Diversity hormone-behavior relation in reproductive behavior. In: Beckerrr, J.B., Breedlove, S.M., Crews, D.A. (Eds.) Behavior Endocrinology. The Bradford Book. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. (Chapter 5).
  4. Daniel WW (1991): Analysis of variance. 274-320. In: WW Daniel (Ed), Biostatistic: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. John Wiley& Sons, Hoboken.
  5. Demirci E (1994): Andrological examination. In: Reproduction, Artificial Insemination, Gyneacology and Infertility in Livestock. Ed: E. Alaçam, Dizgievi, Konya.
  6. Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, Roth BL, Haugland RP (1994): Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J Androl, 15: 620-629.
  7. Kelley DB, Brenowits E (1993): Hormonal influences on courtship behavior. In: Becker, B., Breedlove, S.M., Crews, D.A. (Eds.), Behavior Endocrinology. The Bradford Book. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (Chapter 7).
  8. Saacke RG, White JM (1972): Semen quality test and their relationship to fertility. Proc Fourth Techn Conf Anim Reprod Artif Insem Nat Assoc Anim Breed, Chicago.