Journals / Anatolian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Association Between Admission D-Dimer Levels and Coronary Anatomical Complexity Assessed by the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Akut Koroner Sendromlu Hastalarda Başvuru D-Dimer Düzeyleri ile SYNTAX Skoru ile Değerlendirilen Koroner Anatomik Karmaşıklık Arasındaki İlişki

Mustafa Öcal(UFUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8432-9695
Erdem Öztürk(kırıkkale yüksek ihtisas hastanesi)0009-0002-9499-4351
Pages
83–90
Publication Date
2026-06-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, D-dimer was not an independent predictor in multivariable analysis, and these findings require prospective multicenter validation before clinical implementation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product reflecting intravascular thrombotic activity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 388 patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, D-dimer was not an independent predictor in multivariable analysis, and these findings require prospective multicenter validation before clinical implementation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akut koroner sendrom · D-dimer · SYNTAX skoru

Abstract

Aim: D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product reflecting intravascular thrombotic activity. The SYNTAX score is an angiographic tool quantifying coronary anatomical complexity. The association between D-dimer levels and coronary anatomical complexity in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains incompletely characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the association between plasma D-dimer levels and SYNTAX scores in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Material and Methods: A total of 388 patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized based on D-dimer levels (<0.5 µg/mL FEU and ≥0.5 µg/mL FEU) and SYNTAX score classifications (low: 0–22, intermediate: 23–32, high: ≥33). High-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) was also measured at admission. Correlation analyses, binary logistic regression, and ROC curve assessments were performed. Results: D-dimer levels showed a significant positive correlation with SYNTAX scores (r = 0.385, p < 0.001). Among patients with D-dimer <0.5 µg/mL FEU, 83.9% had low SYNTAX scores, while only 5.1% had high scores. ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64–0.77) for D-dimer in identifying high SYNTAX scores, with 83% sensitivity and 59% specificity at a cut-off of 0.78 µg/mL FEU. In multivariable logistic regression, D-dimer was not an independent predictor of high SYNTAX score after adjustment for age, creatinine, and log-transformed Hs-TnI (OR: 1.891; 95% CI: 0.845–6.062; p = 0.200), whereas log(Hs-TnI) remained independently significant (OR: 1.195; 95% CI: 1.014–1.391; p = 0.024). D-dimer exhibited higher sensitivity than troponin in detecting high anatomical complexity. Conclusion: D-dimer levels show a statistically significant association with coronary anatomical complexity in ACS patients and may serve as a supplementary, non-invasive parameter for early risk stratification. However, D-dimer was not an independent predictor in multivariable analysis, and these findings require prospective multicenter validation before clinical implementation.

Özet

Amaç: D-dimer, intravasküler trombotik aktiviteyi yansıtan bir fibrin yıkım ürünüdür. SYNTAX skoru ise koroner anatomik karmaşıklığı nicel olarak değerlendiren anjiyografik bir araçtır. Akut koroner sendrom (AKS) hastalarında D-dimer düzeyleri ile koroner anatomik karmaşıklık arasındaki ilişki henüz tam olarak ortaya konulamamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akut koroner sendrom (AKS) ile başvuran hastalarda plazma D-dimer düzeyleri ile SYNTAX skorları arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Perkütan koroner girişim (PCI) uygulanan toplam 388 AKS hastası retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Hastalar D-dimer düzeylerine (<0.5 µg/mL FEU ve ≥0.5 µg/mL FEU) ve SYNTAX skoru sınıflamalarına (düşük: 0–22, orta: 23–32, yüksek: ≥33) göre kategorize edildi. Başvuru sırasında yüksek duyarlılıklı troponin I (Hs-TnI) düzeyleri de ölçüldü. Korelasyon analizleri, ikili lojistik regresyon ve ROC eğrisi analizleri gerçekleştirildi. Bulgular: D-dimer düzeyleri ile SYNTAX skorları arasında anlamlı pozitif korelasyon saptandı (r = 0.385, p < 0.001). D-dimer <0.5 µg/mL FEU olan hastaların %83.9’unda düşük SYNTAX skoru bulunurken, yalnızca %5.1’inde yüksek skor mevcuttu. ROC analizinde, yüksek SYNTAX skorunu belirlemede D-dimer için eğri altındaki alan (AUC) 0.70 (95% GA: 0.64–0.77) olarak bulundu; 0.78 µg/mL FEU kesim değerinde duyarlılık %83, özgüllük %59 idi. Çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizinde, yaş, kreatinin ve log-dönüştürülmüş Hs-TnI için düzeltme yapıldığında D-dimer yüksek SYNTAX skoru için bağımsız bir belirleyici değildi (OR: 1.891; %95 GA: 0.845–6.062; p = 0.200); buna karşın log(Hs-TnI) bağımsız olarak anlamlı kaldı (OR: 1.195; %95 GA: 1.014–1.391; p = 0.024). D-dimer, yüksek anatomik karmaşıklığı saptamada troponine göre daha yüksek duyarlılık göstermiştir. Sonuç: D-dimer düzeyleri, AKS hastalarında koroner anatomik karmaşıklık ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki göstermektedir ve erken risk sınıflamasında tamamlayıcı, non-invaziv bir parametre olarak kullanılabilir. Bununla birlikte, çok değişkenli analizde bağımsız bir belirleyici değildir ve klinik uygulamaya girmeden önce bu bulguların prospektif, çok merkezli çalışmalarla doğrulanması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öcal, M., Öztürk, E. (2026). Association Between Admission D-Dimer Levels and Coronary Anatomical Complexity Assessed by the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Anatolian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.54996/anatolianjem.1806445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aydin S, Ugur K, Aydin S, Sahin İ, Yardim M. Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:1–10. doi:10.​2147/​VHRM.​S166157.​
  2. Biccirè FG, Farcomeni A, Gaudio C, Pignatelli P, Tanzilli G, Pastori D. D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb J. 2021;19(1):87. doi:10.​1186/​s12959-​021-​00341-​6.​
  3. Türkoğlu C, Harbalıoğlu H, Şeker T, Baykan AO, Uysal OK. D-dimers are associated with coronary artery disease severity assessed using Syntax and Syntax II scores in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Rev Port Cardiol. 2020;39(12):687–93. doi:10.​1016/​j.​repc.​2020.​08.​006.​
  4. Yamashita A, Nishihira K, Gi T, et al. Pathological Features of Ruptured Coronary Plaque and Thrombus Interfaces: Fibrin and von Willebrand Factor as Platelet Scaffolds on Rupture Sites. Thromb Haemost. 2021 Feb;121(2):234-241. doi: 10.​1055/​s-​0040-​1716539.​
  5. Akgul O, Uyarel H, Pusuroglu H, et al. Predictive value of elevated D-dimer in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013;24(7):704–10. doi:10.​1097/​MBC.​0b013e3283610396.​
  6. Giannitsis E, Mair J, Christersson C, et al. How to use D-dimer in acute cardiovascular care. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017;6(1):69–80. doi:10.​1177/​2048872615610870.​
  7. Tanaka T, Seto S, Yamamoto K, Kondo M, Otomo T. An assessment of risk factors for the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013;28(1):16–21. doi:10.​1007/​s12928-​012-​0112-​5.​
  8. ACC/AHA/SCAI Coronary Revascularization Guideline: Key Perspectives. American College of Cardiology. 2021. Available at: https:/​/​www.​acc.​org (accessed 10 Oct 2025).
  9. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415-3537. doi:10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehae177.​
  10. Banning AP, Serruys P, De Maria GL, et al. Five-year outcomes after state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in de novo three-vessel disease: final results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(13):1307-1317.
  11. Sung WT, Chuang MJ, Tsai YL, Chou RH, Chang CC, Huang PH. Impacts of the SYNTAX score I, II and SYNTAX score II-2020 on left main revascularization. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1073.
  12. Koch V, Booz C, Gruenewald LD, et al. Diagnostic performance and predictive value of D-dimer testing in patients referred to the emergency department for suspected myocardial infarction. Clin Biochem. 2022;104:22-29. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinbiochem.​2022.​02.​003.​
  13. Wu AHB, Christenson RH. Analytical and assay issues for use of cardiac troponin testing for risk stratification in primary care. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(12):969–78. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinbiochem.​2013.​04.​013.​
  14. Ezaki M, Wada H, Ichikawa Y, et al. Plasma soluble fibrin is useful for the diagnosis of thrombotic diseases. J Clin Med. 2023;12(7):2597. doi:10.​3390/​jcm12072597.​
  15. Simes J, Robledo KP, White HD, et al. D-dimer predicts long-term cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, and cancer in patients with stable coronary heart disease: LIPID study. Circulation. 2018;138(7):712–23. doi:10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​117.​029901.​
  16. Choi S, Jang WJ, Song YB, et al. D-dimer levels predict myocardial injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160955. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0160955.​
  17. Li L, Wang W, Li T, Gao Y, Wang L, Yao HC. Gender-related difference in D-dimer level predicts in-hospital heart failure after primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Dis Markers. 2021;2021:7641138. doi:10.​1155/​2021/​7641138.​
  18. Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW. A test in context: D-dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2411–20. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2017.​09.​024.