This shows that in order to understand women teachers’ perception of the glass ceiling syndrome, one should take into account not only socio-demographic, but also psychological factors such as learned helplessness.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study empirically investigated the influence of learned helplessness and selected socio-demographic variables on women teachers’ perception of glass ceiling syndromes propensity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A research study was conducted with the women teachers working in college in the city of Antalya for the purpose of identifying the significant predicators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This shows that in order to understand women teachers’ perception of the glass ceiling syndrome, one should take into account not only socio-demographic, but also psychological factors such as learned helplessness.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glass ceiling Syndrome · learned helplessness · women teachers
Özet
This study empirically investigated the influence of learned helplessness and selected socio-demographic variables on women teachers’ perception of glass ceiling syndromes propensity. A research study was conducted with the women teachers working in college in the city of Antalya for the purpose of identifying the significant predicators. The results from the binary logistic regression analysis reveal that child possession and learned helplessness are the main factors affecting women teachers’ perception of the glass ceiling syndrome in their working environment. This shows that in order to understand women teachers’ perception of the glass ceiling syndrome, one should take into account not only socio-demographic, but also psychological factors such as learned helplessness.
Çizel, R., Çizel, B. (2014). Factors Influence Women Teachers’ Perception of Glass Ceiling Syndrome. Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 63–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/1358685
Aşık, G., A. (2013). “Türkiye’yi Kadınlar Büyütebilir mi?”. Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı, Şubat: 1-6.
Can, N., & Özer, M. (2012). “Türkiye’de İşgücü Piyasası”. Atılım Üniversitesi Siyasi ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Laboratuvarı, Aralık, 1-4. “Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. Solid Investments: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital”. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Labor, November 1995, 4.
Kümbül-Güler, B. (2012). “Bir Depresyon Teorisi Olarak Öğrenilmiş Çaresizliğin Çalışma Hayatındaki Yansıması”. Eds. Keser, A., Yılmaz, G., & Yürür, S. Çalışma Yaşamında Davranış İçinde, 473-516.
Meyerson, D., E., & Fletcher, J., K. (2000). “A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling”. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 126-136.
Nunnally, J., C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Qutaiba, A. (2011). “The Relationship Between the Level of School-Involvement and Learned Helplessness Among Special-Education Teachers in the Arab Sector”. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (2), 1-15.
Seligman, M., E., P. (1972). “Learned Helplessness”. Annual Review of Medicine, 23, 407-412.
Şimşek, M., Ş., Çelik, A., & Akatay, A. (2007). Kariyer Yönetimi ve İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamaları. Gazi Kitabevi. Ankara.
Tayfur, Ö. (2012). “The Antecedents and Consequences of Learned Helplessness in Work Life”. Information Management and Business Review, 4 (7), 417-427.