Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Classification of durum wheat varieties by artificial neural networks

Yapay sinir ağları ile makarnalık buğday çeşitlerinin sınıflandırılması

Pages
51–59
Publication Date
2015-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The physical properties of 11 durum wheat varieties grown in our country, namely thousand kernel weight, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, kernel volume, surface area, bulk density, true density, porosity and color parameters of grain, were determined and it was found that these properties were statistically significant with respect to varieties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was developed in order to classify durum wheat varieties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The physical properties of 11 durum wheat varieties grown in our country, namely thousand kernel weight, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, kernel volume, surface area, bulk density, true density, porosity and color parameters of grain, were determined and it was found that these properties were statistically significant with respect to varieties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By this model, it would be possible to construct automation systems for classification and cleaning in Commodity (Grain) Exchange and flour mills.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial neural networks · durum wheat · physical properties

Abstract

In this study, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was developed in order to classify durum wheat varieties. For this purpose, physical properties of durum wheat varieties were determined and ANN techniques were used. The physical properties of 11 durum wheat varieties grown in our country, namely thousand kernel weight, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, kernel volume, surface area, bulk density, true density, porosity and color parameters of grain, were determined and it was found that these properties were statistically significant with respect to varieties. As ANN model, three models, M-l, M-ll and M-lll were constructed. The performances of these models were compared. It was determined that the best fit model was M-1. In the M-1 model, the structure of the model was designed to be 11 input layers, 2 hidden layers and 1 output layer. Thousand kernel weight, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, kernel volume, surface area, bulk density, true density, porosity and color parameters of grain were used as input parameter; and varieties as output parameter. R2, RMSE and mean error for the M-l model were found as 99.99%, 0.00074 and 0.009%, respectively. All results obtained by the M-l model were observed to have been quite consistent with real data. By this model, it would be possible to construct automation systems for classification and cleaning in Commodity (Grain) Exchange and flour mills.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, makarnalık buğday çeşitlerinin sınıflandırmasını yapmak amacıyla bir Yapay Sinir Ağları (YSA) modeli geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla makarnalık buğdaylara ait fiziksel özellikler belirlenmiş ve YSA teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Ülkemizde yetiştirilmekte olan on bir adet makarnalık buğday çeşidinin fiziksel özelliklerinden olan bin dane ağırlığı, geometrik ortalama çap, küresellik, dane hacmi, yüzey alanı, hacim ağırlığı, özgül ağırlık, porozite ve renk belirlenmiş ve bu özelliklerin çeşitlere göre istatistiksel olarak farklı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. YSA modeli olarak M-l, M-ll ve M-lll olmak üzere üç adet model geliştirilmiştir. Bu modellerin performansları karşılaştırılmıştır. En uygun modelin M-l modeli olduğu belirlenmiştir. M-l modelinde ağın yapısı, 11 giriş, 2 ara ve 1 çıkış katmanı olarak dizayn edilmiştir. Giriş parametresi olarak bin dane ağırlığı, geometrik ortalama çap, küresellik, dane hacmi, yüzey alanı, hacim ağırlığı, özgül ağırlık, porozite ve renk, çıkış parametresi olarak ise çeşitler kullanılmıştır. M-l modeli için R2 değeri %99.99, RMSE değeri 0.00074 ve ortalama hata değeri %0.009 olarak bulunmuştur. M-l modeli ile elde edilen tüm sonuçların gerçek veriler ile uyumluluk içinde olduğu görülmüştür. Bu model ile Ticaret Borsaları ve un fabrikalarında ürünleri sınıflandırma ve temizleme amacıyla otomasyon sistemleri oluşturmak mümkün olabilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANER, A., TEKGÜLER, A., SAUK, H. (2015). Classification of durum wheat varieties by artificial neural networks. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 51–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/135719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Anonymous, 1996. www. hunterlab.com. CIE L* a* b*color scale. Atlı, A., Koçak, N., Aktan, M. 1993. Ülkemiz çevre koşullarının kaliteli makarnalık buğday yetiştirmeye uygunluk yönünden değerlendirilmesi. Hububat Sempozyumu, 8-11 Haziran 1993, 345-351s., Konya. Aviara, N.A., Gwandzang, M.I., Haque, M.A. 1999. Physical properties of guna seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73: 105-111.
  2. Aydoğan, H., Altun, A.A., Ozcelik, A.E. 2011. Performance analysis of a turbocharged diesel engine using biodiesel with back propagation artificial neural network. Energ Educ Sci Tech-A, 28: 459-468.
  3. Babalık, A., Baykan, Ö.K., Botsalı, F.M. 2006. Determination of wheat kernel type by using image processing techniques and ANN. The International Conference on Modelling and Simulating, August 28-30,
  4. Konya. Bağırkan, Ş. 1993. İstatistiksel Analiz. Bilim Teknik Yayınevi. s. 301. İstanbul.
  5. Baykan, Ö.K., Babalık, A., Botsalı, F.M. 2005. Yapay sinir ağı kullanarak buğday türü tanınması. 4. Uluslararası İleri Teknolojiler Sempozyumu, Konya, Eylül 28-30, 188-190.
  6. Bechtler, H., Browne, M.W., Bansal, P.K., Kecman, V. 2001. New approach to dynamic modelling of vapour-compression liquid chillers: artificial neural networks. Appl Therm Eng, 21: 941-53.
  7. Bell, M., Fischer, R.A. 1994. Guide to plant and crop sampling: Measurement and observations for agronomic and physiological research in small grain cereals. Wheat Special Report. No. 32, CIMMYT, Mexico D.F. Chen, X., Xun, Y., Li, W. and Zhang, J. 2010. Combining discriminant analysis and neural networks for corn variety identification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 71S, S48–S53. Connolly, C., Fleiss, T. 1997. A study of efficiency and accuracy in the transformation from RGB to CIELAB colour space. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6: 1046-1048.
  8. Çölkesen, M., Öktem, A., Eren, N., Akıncı, C. 1993. Determination of suitable durum wheat varieties on dry and irrigated conditions in Şanlıurfa. The Symposium of Durum Wheat and Products, p. 573. Ankara.
  9. Dubey, B.P., Bhagwat, S.G., Shouche, S.P., Sainis, J.K. 2006. Potential of Artificial Neural Networks in Varietal Identification using Morphometry of Wheat Grains. Biosystems Engineering 95: 61-67.
  10. Dursun, E., Güner, M. 2003. Determination of mechanical behaviour of wheat and barley under compression loading. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9: 415-420.
  11. Genç, İ., Yağbasanlar, T., Özkan, H., Kılınç, M. 1993. Seçilmiş bazı makarnalık buğday hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu b