Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Leaflet shape analysis separates rose cultivars and estimates leaf area

Pages
220–226
Publication Date
2019-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was determined that rose leaflet tip angle not only has the ability of being as a good morphometric marker in separating rose stem leaf layers but also it is capable of identifying different rose cultivars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Trying to use tip leaflet of rose plants as a sample to estimate leaf area and to separate rose cultivars, in an experiment we took leaf images from three different stem layers of four garden roses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analysis of variance showed that it would be possible to separate rose cultivars by including only two leaf properties, i.e., tip leaflet angle and leaflet area to leaf area ratio.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was determined that rose leaflet tip angle not only has the ability of being as a good morphometric marker in separating rose stem leaf layers but also it is capable of identifying different rose cultivars.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler image analysis · leaf morphometric features · leaf area

Özet

Öz Trying to use tip leaflet of rose plants as a sample to estimate leaf area and to separate rose cultivars, in an experiment we took leaf images from three different stem layers of four garden roses. After preliminary image pre-processing measures, some important leaf geometric features such as leaf and leaflet area, perimeter, circularity and leaflet length and width were measured or calculated. Analysis of variance showed that it would be possible to separate rose cultivars by including only two leaf properties, i.e., tip leaflet angle and leaflet area to leaf area ratio. It was also determined that three leaf layers along the rose stem can be recognized and categorized by implementing just angle of tip leaflet. Leaflet area was agreeably approximated by fitting a simple linear model to the product of leaflet minor and major axes. Further analyses indicated that some leaflet properties such as solidity, perimeter and circularity can be used as significant criteria to distinguish rose cultivars, however other features like leaflet elongation and rectangularity were quite poor and insignificant in this case. In conclusion, it was determined that rose leaflet tip angle not only has the ability of being as a good morphometric marker in separating rose stem leaf layers but also it is capable of identifying different rose cultivars.

🔖

Cite This Article

MATLOOBİ, M., TAHMASEBİ, S., NAHANDİ, F. Z., MOTALLEBİ-AZAR, A. (2019). Leaflet shape analysis separates rose cultivars and estimates leaf area. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 220–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/135587

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics International. 11: 36-42.
  2. Ashok AD, Rengasamy P. 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertigation at different levels and sources on the Growth of cut rose cv. First Red under greenhouse conditions. South Indian Hortic. 48:139-141.
  3. Antunes WC, Pompelli MF, Carretero DM, DaMatta FM. 2008. Allometric models for non-destructive leaf area estimation in coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora). Annals of Applied Biology. 153:33-40. Aravanopoulos FA. 2005. Phenotypic variation and population relationships of chestnut (Castanea sativa) in greece, Revealed by Multivariate Analysis of Leaf Morphometrics. Acta Hortic. 693: 233-240.
  4. Arunpriya C, Thanamani AS. 2014. An effective tea leaf recognition algorithm for plant classification using radial basis function machine. Journal of Modern Engineering Research. 4:35-44.
  5. Baret F, Coppin P, Fleck S, Jonckheere I, Muys B, Nackaerts K, Weiss M. 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agr Forest Meteorol. 121:19-35.
  6. Bell A, Bryan A. 2008. Plant Form: An illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. London: Timber Press. 432. Blanco FF, Folegatti MV. 2005. Estimation of leaf area for greenhouse cucumber by linear measurements under salinity and grafting. Scientia Agricola. 62: 305-309.
  7. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Hoogenboom G. 1986. Research and management application of the PNUTGRO crop growth model. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Edu. Soc. 20: 57. Bredmose N, Hansen J, Nielsen J. 2001. Topophysic influences on rose bud and shoot growth and flower development are determined by endogenous axillary bud factors, in III International Symposium on Rose Research and Cultivation, eds N. Zieslin and H.Agbaria (Herzliya: International Society Horticultural Science).177–183.
  8. Carins murphy MR, Jordan GJ, Brodribb TJ. 2012. Differential leaf expansion can enable hydraulic acclimation to sun and shade. Plant, Cell and Environment. 35: 1407-1418.
  9. Cerutti GL, Tougne A, Vacavant, Coquin D. 2011. A parametric active polygon for leaf segmentation and shape estimation. In International Symposium on Visual Computing (ISVC). 202–213.
  10. Chitwood DH, Headland LR, Filiault DL, Kumar R, Jimenez Gomez JM, Schrager AV. 2012. Native environment modulates leaf size and response to simulated foliar shade across wild tomato species. PLoS ONE. 7:e29570. Chitwood DH, Headland LR, Kumar R, Peng J, Maloof JN, Sinha NR.