Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Çeşitli yetiştirme ortamlarında ek besin olarak kullanılan peynir altı suyunun biyodizel hammaddesi Chlorella vulgaris’in üretim potansiyeline etkisinin belirlenmesi

Determination of the effect of whey as a nutritional supplement in different growth medium regarding to its potential to biodiesel feedstock production

Pages
309–315
Publication Date
2017-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is found that wheycan be considered as a promising feed source for the production of Chlorella vulgaris.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Large-scale production of microalgae is a costly process because of high costs of microalgae feed, artificial lighting and operational costs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chlorella vulgaris was produced in four different growth medium of 1) Blue Green Medium(BG11) Chlorella vulgaris 2) Blue Green Medium(BG11) whey (CW) Chlorella vulgaris 3) Bold’s Basal Medium (BMM) Chlorella vulgaris and 4) Tap water(TW) Chlorella vulgaris.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is found that wheycan be considered as a promising feed source for the production of Chlorella vulgaris.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Microalgae · Photobioreactor · Chlorella vulgaris

Abstract

Large-scale production of microalgae is a costly process because of high costs of microalgae feed, artificial lighting and operational costs. Whey (CW) is one of the agricultural waste materials which contains high amounts of protein and minerals and is considered as a feed source for Chlorella vulgaris. The objective of this research was to determine the effects of wheyon biomass production of Chlorella vulgaris. Chlorella vulgaris was produced in four different growth medium of 1) Blue Green Medium(BG11) Chlorella vulgaris 2) Blue Green Medium(BG11) whey (CW) Chlorella vulgaris 3) Bold’s Basal Medium (BMM) Chlorella vulgaris and 4) Tap water(TW) Chlorella vulgaris. After 21 days of experimentation, the highest number microalgae cells, biomass gain and lipid were observed in Bold's Basal Medium (BMM) Chlorella vulgaris growth medium containing as 79.7x106 cell mL-1, 10.14 g L-1 and 20.7%, respectively. It is found that wheycan be considered as a promising feed source for the production of Chlorella vulgaris.

Özet

Mikroalgler, geleceğin yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından görülmelerine rağmen, günümüzde büyük ölçekli üretimleri oldukça pahalı bir süreçtir. Mikroalgler tarımsal kaynaklı atık sularda yer alan kimyasalları ve ağır metalleri besin kaynağı olarak kullanarak üremelerini devam ettirebilirler. Tarımsal atık sulardan önemli bir tanesi de peynir altı suyudur. Peynir atık suyu içerdiği yoğun protein nedeniyle mikroalg yetiştirilmesi için uygun bir besin kaynağı olarak da kullanılabilir. Bu çalışmada, 500 ml’lik 4 farklı yetiştirme ortamı hazırlanarak 1)Mavi yeşil alg ortamı (BG11) Chlorella vulgaris 2) Mavi yeşil alg ortamı (BG11) Peynir altısuyu (CW) Chlorella vulgaris 3) Bold’s Basal ortamı (BMM) Chlorella vulgaris and 4)Çeşme suyu (TW) Chlorella vulgaris ortamlarında üretilmeye çalışılmıştır. 21 gün süren denemeler sonucunda en yüksek, hücre sayısı, biyomas ve oransal yağ miktarı artışı Bold’s Basal ortamı Peynir altısuyu ve Chlorella vulgaris ortamında sırasıyla 79.7x106 cell mL-1 , 10.14 g L-1 ve %20.7 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Yapılan denemelerde peynir altı suyunun Chlorella vulgaris üretiminde besin kaynağı olarak kullanılabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sonuçlar istatistiksel analizlerle de desteklenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, C., DURAN, H. (2017). Çeşitli yetiştirme ortamlarında ek besin olarak kullanılan peynir altı suyunun biyodizel hammaddesi Chlorella vulgaris’in üretim potansiyeline etkisinin belirlenmesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 309–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/135532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abdel-Raouf, N., Al-Homaidan, A.A., Ibraheem, I.B.M., 2012. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 19(3), doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.04.005. Acien, F.G., Fernandez, J.M., Magan, J.J., Molina, E., 2012. Production cost of a real microalgae production plant and strategies to reduce it. Biotechnology Advances, 30(6): 1344-1353. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.005. Acien, F.G., Gomez-Serrano, C., Morales-Amaral, M.M., Fernandez-Sevilla, J.M., Molina-Grima, E., 2016. Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(21): 9013-9022. doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7835-7.
  2. Adamczyk, M., Lasek, J., Skawinska, A., 2016. CO2 Biofixation and Growth Kinetics of Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis gaditana. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 179(7): 1248-1261. doi:10.1007/s12010- 016-2062-3.
  3. Amaro, H.M., Macedo, A.C., Malcata, F.X., 2012. Microalgae: An alternative as sustainable source of biofuels? Energy, 44(1): 158-166.
  4. Aravinthan, V., Story, N., Yusaf, T., 2014. Nutrient removal of nursery and municipal wastewater using Chlorella vulgaris microalgae for lipid extraction. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(4-6): 727-736.
  5. Cai, T., Park, S.Y., Li, Y.B., 2013. Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: Status and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19: 360-369. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.030. Giovanardi, M., Baldisserotto, C., Daglia, M., Ferroni, L., Sabia, A., Pancaldi, S., 2016. Morpho-physiological aspects of Scenedesmus acutus PVUW12 cultivated with a dairy industry waste and after starvation. Plant Biosystems, 150(4): 767- 775.doi:10.1080/11263504.2014.991361. Girard, J.M., Roy, M.L., Ben Hafsa, M., Gagnon, J., Faucheux, N., Heitz, M., Deschenes, J.S., 2014. Mixotrophic cultivation of green microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus on wheypermeate for biodiesel production. Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts, 5: 241-248. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2014.03.002. Glemser, M., Heining, M., Schmidt, J., Becker, A., Garbe, D., Buchholz, R., Bruck, T., 2016. Application of lightemitting diodes (LEDs) in cultivation of phototrophic microalgae: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100(3): 1077-1088. doi:10.1007/s00253-015-7144-6.
  6. Gupta, P.L., Lee, S.M., Choi, H.J. 2015. A mini review: photobioreactors for large scale algal cultivation. World Journal of Microbiology