Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

Erosion Hazard in Central Anatolia, and the Importance and Priority of Environmental Problems on Land Consolidation

Orta Anadolu’da Erozyon Tehdidi ve Toplulaştırma Uygulamalarında Çevre Sorunlarının Önem ve Önceliği

Muhittin Çelebi(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÇUMRA MYO.)0000-0002-6537-1641
Pages
171–179
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that it is very important role to play considering environmental problems as a priority issue in consolidation, and that all conditions suitable for erosion generally occur simultaneously in April and October.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wind erosion is an important problem in Central Anatolia and is usually encountered in uncovered or bare soils during periods simultaneously of low soil moisture content and high wind speed conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the current study; (i) soil moisture was measured (ii) Winds were analyzed in Konya and Karaman, (iii) The suitability of the blocks of 11 land consolidation projects in Konya and Karaman, and the Karaman Yollarbaşı consolidation and afforestation project for an effective barrier (windbreaks) was compared in terms of their angular positions with the prevailing wind (iii) the surface drainage system of Karaman Gödet irrigation was examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that it is very important role to play considering environmental problems as a priority issue in consolidation, and that all conditions suitable for erosion generally occur simultaneously in April and October.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kırsal kalkınma · toprak nem içeriği · toprağın üretim potansiyeli

Abstract

Wind erosion is an important problem in Central Anatolia and is usually encountered in uncovered or bare soils during periods simultaneously of low soil moisture content and high wind speed conditions. In case of ecological requirements are not taken into account in consolidation, it may cause some problems such as acceleration in erosion. This study was carried out to reveal importance and priority of environmental conditions in land consolidation practices for erosion-prone periods in Konya province. In the current study; (i) soil moisture was measured (ii) Winds were analyzed in Konya and Karaman, (iii) The suitability of the blocks of 11 land consolidation projects in Konya and Karaman, and the Karaman Yollarbaşı consolidation and afforestation project for an effective barrier (windbreaks) was compared in terms of their angular positions with the prevailing wind (iii) the surface drainage system of Karaman Gödet irrigation was examined. Effective winds blows from South West (SW, SSW) in March and April, and from North West (NW, WNW) in September and October in Konya plain. In Karaman Yollarbaşı consolidation project, %88.2 of the blocks are located perpendicular to the dominant wind in SW, SSW, NE and NNE direction responsible for erosion, while only % 37.7 (60˗90º) of the blocks are located perpendicular to primary winds in the other 11 projects. It was concluded that it is very important role to play considering environmental problems as a priority issue in consolidation, and that all conditions suitable for erosion generally occur simultaneously in April and October.

Özet

Kurak iklime sahip Orta Anadolu’da rüzgâr erozyonu önemli bir sorundur. Rüzgâr erozyonuna genellikle yüzeyi örtüsüz topraklarda, düşük toprak nemi ve şiddetli rüzgârın eş zamanlı gerçekleştiği dönemlerde rastlanır. Uygulama alanının özellikleri ve ekolojik gereksinimleri dikkate alınmadan yapılan toplulaştırmaların erozyonu hızlandırmak gibi bazı olumsuzluklara yol açtığı da bilinmektedir. Bu çalışma, Konya’da erozyona yatkın dönemleri tahmin etmek, toplulaştırma uygulamalarında çevre ihtiyaçlarının öncelikle dikkate alınmasının önemini ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada; (i) Konya - Çumra MYO deneme tarlasında toprak nemi Mart-Ekim döneminde aralıklarla gravimetrik yöntemle ölçülmüş, (ii) Konya ve Karaman’da eşik hızı aşan rüzgârlar aylara ve yönlerine göre incelenmiş, (iii) Karaman Yollarbaşı kasabası toplulaştırma ve ağaçlandırma projesi ile Konya ve Karaman’da 11 köyde uygulanan arazi toplulaştırma projesinin verileri incelenerek; tesis edilen blokların etkin bir bariyer (windbreaks) tesisine uygunluğu değerlendirilmiş, (iiii) Karaman Gödet sulamasının yüzey tahliye sistemi incelenmiştir. Konya’da etkili rüzgârlar Mart ve Nisanda Güneybatıdan (SW, SSW), Eylül ve Ekimde Kuzeybatıdan (NW, WNW) esmektedir. Rüzgâr erozyonuna karşı ağaçlandırmayı da içeren Karaman Yollarbaşı toplulaştırma projesinde blokların %88.2 si erozyondan sorumlu SW, SSW, NE ve NNE yönlü hâkim rüzgâra dik konumluyken diğer 11 projede sadece % 37.7sinin (60˗90º) dike yakın konumda olduğu değerlendirilmiştir. Toplulaştırmalarda çevre sorunlarının öncelikli bir konu olarak dikkate alınmasının büyük önem taşıdığı, genellikle nisan ve ekimde erozyona uygun bütün koşulların eş zamanlı gerçekleştiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelebi, M. (2021). Erosion Hazard in Central Anatolia, and the Importance and Priority of Environmental Problems on Land Consolidation. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.878103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Abel N, Baxter J, Campbell A, Cleugh H, Fargher J, Lambeck R, Prinsley R, Prosser M, Reid R, Revell G, Schmidt C, Stirzaker R, Thorburn P 1997. Design Principles for Farm Forestry a Guide to Assist Farmers to Decide Where to Place Trees and Farm Plantations on Farms. Barton A.C.T. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 102p. ISBN 0642246556
  2. Amiri F 2010. Estimate of Erosion and Sedimentation in Semi-arid Basin Using Empirical Models of Erosion Potential Within a Geographic Information System. Air. Soil and Water Research 3: 37-44
  3. Anonim 1986. Yeşeren Çöl Karapınar. Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Genel yayın no:7 Ankara.
  4. Anonim 2020. DMİGM Türkiye İklim Sınıflandırması. (Alınma tarihi 10.12.2020) https://mgm.gov.tr/FILES/genel/sss/iklimsiniflandirmalariturkiye.pdf
  5. Çanga MR 1987. Türkiye Topraklarında Rüzgâr Erozyonu ve Kontrol Yöntemleri. Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Derneği İstanbul şubesi Yayını. 10: 62-71
  6. Çelebi M 1989. Karaman Ovasında Toplulaştırma Alanlarındaki Parselasyonun Parsel Boyutları ve Kültür Teknik Hizmetlere Etkisi Üzerinde Bir Araştırma Selçuk Üniversitesi F. B. E, Toprak A.B.D, Doktora tezi, 103 s.
  7. Çelebi M, Sağlam C, Duran A 2015. The Potential Contribution of Land Consolidation to Prevent Wind Erosion in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24 ( 2): 429-437.
  8. Chepil WS 1956. Influence of Moisture on Erodibility of Soil by Wind Soil Science Society of America Journal 20 (2): 288-292.
  9. Chepil WS 1959. Wind Erodibility of Farm Fields. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 14: 214-219.
  10. Gečaitė D, Jankava A 2017. Envıronmental Impact of Land Consolıdatıon, Baltic surveying international scientıfic journal 6 (1): 39-45.
  11. Fécan F, Marticorena B, Bergametti G 1999. Parameterization of the Increase of The Aeolian Erosion Threshold Wind Friction Velocity Due to Soil Moisture for Arid and Semi-Arid Areas. Annales Geophysicae 17(1):149-157
  12. Hapel KH 1990. Festigkeitsanalyse Dynamisch Beanspruchter Offshore-konstruktionen, (Strength Analysis of Offshore Structures Under Dynamic Loading) Vieweg-+Teubner Verlag, Braunschweig ISBN 978-3-528-06368-9
  13. Hartvigsen M 2014. Land Consolidation and Land Banking in Denmark - Tradition, Multi-Purpose and Perspectives. Danish Journal of Geoinformatics and Land Management, Volume 47, p. 51-74.
  14. Ishizuka M, Mikami, M, Yamada M, Zeng F, Gao W, 2005. An Observational Study of Soil Moisture Effects on Wind Erosion at a Gobi Site in the Taklimakan Desert, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18S03, doi:10.1029/2004JD004709
  15. Jun W, Shenchun Y, Yiqiang G, Junran L. Guoqing S 2015. The Effects of Land Consolidation on The Ecological Connectivity Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of Da’an Land Consolidation Project In Jilin Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(5): 603-616.
  16. Kadlec V, Žížala D, Novotný I, Heřmanovská D, Kapička J, Tippl M 2014. Land Consolidations as an Effective Instrument in Soil Conservation. Ekológia (Bratislava), 33 ( 2): 188–200
  17. Karasek P, Konecna J, Pochop M, Kucera J, Podhrazska J 2018. Priority Areas for Initiating Land Consolidations Related to Erosion and Water Retention in the Landscape, Czech Republic, Journal of Ecological Engineering 19 (4): 16–28
  18. Kayalık P 2007. Türkiye’de Rüzgâr Erozyonu Olgusu, Karapınar (Konya) Örneğindeki Çalışmaların İrdelenmesi ve Öneriler. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 224s.
  19. Pieri L, Bittelli M, WU J Q, Dun S, Flanagan DC, Pisa PR, Ventura F, Salvatorelli F 2007. Using the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) Model to Simulate Field-Observed Runoff and Erosion in the Apennines Mountain Range. Italy. Journal of Hydrology. 336: 84–97
  20. Presley D A, and Tatarko J, 2009. Principles of Wind Erosion and its Control, K-State Research and Extension Publication. MF-2860.
  21. Selah A, Fryrear DW 1995. Threshold Wind Velocities of Wet Soils as Affected by Wind Blown Sand. Soil Science, 160 (4): 304-309
  22. Scepıta O 2011. Building Erosion Control Measures in Land Consolidation Project, Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 19 (2): 32 – 36, DOI: 10.2478/v10189- 011-0011-2
  23. Sert A, Ceylan AR, Yeşiloğlu İB 2011. Doğa koruma Amaçlı Arazi Toplulaştırma Projesi “DSİ Antalya Aksu Deresi Arazi Toplulaştırma Örneği. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 18-22 Nisan, Ankara.
  24. Spaan WP, Wınteraeken HJ, Rıksen MJPM 2006. Dutch Policy and Practices on Erosion Control: Then and Now, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science April 52(2): 233 – 241
  25. Thurow TL, Blackburn WH, Taylor CA 1988. Infiltration and Interrill Erosion Responses to Selected Livestock Grazing Strategies, Edwards Plateau, Texas, J. Range Management., 41(4): 296-302.
  26. Turnbull L, Wainwright J, Brazier RE 2008. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Semi-Arid Land Degradation: Ecohydrological İnteraction Across Multiple–Sapace and Time Scales. Ecohydrology 1 (1): 23-34
  27. Woch F 2005. Kształtowanıe Środowıska Rolnıczego na Obszarach Urzeźbıonych w Polsce, na tle Wzorców Unıjnych, Acta Agrophysica 5(2): 471– 480.
  28. Woodruff NP, Zingg AW 1952. Wind-tunnel Studies Of Fundamental Problems Related To Windbreaks. United States. Soil Conservation ServiceResearch; Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, SCS-TP-112, pp25, Washington, D.C.
  29. Yoshino M 2002. Kosa (Asian Dust) Related to Asian Monsoon System. Korean J. Atmos. Sci., 5: 93‒100.
  30. Selah A, Fryrear DW 1995. Threshold Wind Velocities of Wet Soils as Affected by Wind Blown Sand. Soil Science, 160 (4): 304-309