Journals / Acta Medica Nicomedia / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Utility Analyses of Artificial Temporal Bone Dissection and Virtual Reality Surgical Anatomy Training Applications

Yapay Temporal Kemik ile Diseksiyon ve Sanal Gerçeklik Cerrahi Anatomi Eğitimi Uygulamalarının Yararlılığının Değerlendirilmesi

Murat Öztürk(Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-3340-9975
Bülent Topuz(DEMİROĞLU BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KULAK, BURUN, BOĞAZ HASTALIKLARI ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-7895-6190
Aytaç Kılıç(İskenderun Devlet Hastanesi)0000-0002-2042-0796
Pages
65–69
Publication Date
2025-02-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When combined with standard training, they seem to be beneficial due to their repetitive and easily available nature, as well as potential economic, logistical, and ethical advantages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the utility of artificial temporal bone dissection and virtual reality surgical anatomy training applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The artificial bone dissection was considered 90.7% beneficial or very beneficial, 87.5% similar to real anatomy, 78.1% similar or very similar to real bone.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When combined with standard training, they seem to be beneficial due to their repetitive and easily available nature, as well as potential economic, logistical, and ethical advantages.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temporal kemik · Yapay kemik · Mastoidektomi

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the utility of artificial temporal bone dissection and virtual reality surgical anatomy training applications. Method: The utility of the applications was analyzed by the feedback survey of the residents who participate the artificial temporal bone dissection and virtual reality surgical anatomy training courses. Results: The artificial bone dissection was considered 90.7% beneficial or very beneficial, 87.5% similar to real anatomy, 78.1% similar or very similar to real bone. No one considered it little beneficial or useless. The virtual reality training was considered 87.5% beneficial or very beneficial. Conclusion: Both methods were considered highly useful. When combined with standard training, they seem to be beneficial due to their repetitive and easily available nature, as well as potential economic, logistical, and ethical advantages.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yapay temporal kemik modelinde diseksiyon ile sanal gerçeklik cerrahi anatomi eğitimin yararlılığının araştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Yapay temporal kemik ile diseksiyon gerçekleştiren ve sanal gerçeklik ile cerrahi anatomi eğitimine katılan uzmanlık öğrencilerinden anket ile geribildirim alındı ve uygulamaların yararlılığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yapay kemik ile diseksiyon %90,7 faydalı ve çok faydalı, %87,5 gerçek anatomiye uygun, %78,1 gerçek kemiğe benziyor ve çok benziyor bulundu. Faydası az ya da faydasız değerlendiren olmadı. Sanal gerçeklik eğitimi ise %87,5 faydalı ve çok faydalı olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Her iki yöntemde yüksek oranda faydalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Olası ekonomik, lojistik, etik avantajları, tekrarlanabilir ve kolay ulaşabilir olmaları nedenleri ile klasik eğitim ile kombine olarak kullanılmaları faydalı görünmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, M., Topuz, B., Kılıç, A. (2025). Utility Analyses of Artificial Temporal Bone Dissection and Virtual Reality Surgical Anatomy Training Applications. Acta Medica Nicomedia, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.53446/actamednicomedia.1623514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Frithioff A, Frendø M, Pedersen DB, Sørensen MS, Wuyts Andersen SA. 3D-Printed Models for Temporal Bone Surgical Training: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(5):617-625. doi:10.1177/0194599821993384
  2. Boillat M, Bonnet AS, Groubatch F, Falanga A, Gillet R, Parietti-Winkler C. Analysis of the milling response of an artificial temporal bone developed for otologic surgery in comparison with human cadaveric samples. Med Eng Phys. 2024;131:104220. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104220
  3. Kurichiyil SH, Whittaker JD, Dalton CL. Face and Content Validation of Artificial Temporal Bone Dissection for Otolaryngology Training. J Laryngol Otol. Published online October 25, 2024. doi:10.1017/S0022215124001774
  4. Everad F, Albrecht T, Kromeier J, et al. A Virtual Reality Anatomy Model of the Temporal Bone in ORL Residency Training-Gain or Gadget?. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024;11:23821205241281506. Published 2024 Oct 9. doi:10.1177/23821205241281506