Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4

Determination of forage yield and quality parameters of different mixture ratios of grass pea and various cereal forage crops

Mürdümük ve farklı buğdayğil yem bitkilerinin karışım oranlarının yem verimi ve kalite parametrelerinin belirlenmesi

Tahir Polat(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5754-9684
Pages
697–706
Publication Date
2025-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the yield and quality characteristics of the 20% grass pea + 80% barley mixture are evaluated together a mixture of 60% grass pea + 40% barley can be recommended to obtain high-yield and quality roughage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the suitable mixture ratio for a high-yield and applicable mixed planting system for the grass pea plant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The project was carried out in the winter seasons according to the randomized block experimental design with 3 replications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the yield and quality characteristics of the 20% grass pea + 80% barley mixture are evaluated together a mixture of 60% grass pea + 40% barley can be recommended to obtain high-yield and quality roughage.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:mürdümük · yem bitkileri · verim

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the suitable mixture ratio for a high-yield and applicable mixed planting system for the grass pea plant. In the project, grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), triticale (Triticosecale Wittmack), and oat (Avena sativa L.) were used. The project was carried out in the winter seasons according to the randomized block experimental design with 3 replications. In the trial, plant height (cm), total dry forage yield kg da-1 ), crude protein yield kg da-1 digestibility dry matter yield, botanical composition ratios by weight, Land Equivalent Ratio and ratio of legumes to cereals were determined. The study was carried out for two years, and average values were calculated. In the study, depending on the increase in grass pea seed ratio, green grass yield, dry grass yield, and crude protein yield increased. In both years, although the pure barley, triticale, oat and the 20% grass pea + 80% barley mixture had high dry grass yield, the crude protein yield of the pure grass pea and the 60% grass pea + 40% barley mixture was found to be high. When the yield and quality characteristics of the 20% grass pea + 80% barley mixture are evaluated together a mixture of 60% grass pea + 40% barley can be recommended to obtain high-yield and quality roughage.

Özet

Bu çalışma mürdümük bitkisi için yüksek verimli ve uygulanabilir karışık ekim sistemi için uygun karışım oranını belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada mürdümük (Lathyrus sativus L.), arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.), tritikale (Triticosecale Wittmack) ve yulaf (Avena sativa L.) kullanılmıştır. Proje kış sezonunda tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 3 tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. Denemede; bitki boyu (cm, kuru ot verimi (kg da-1), ham protein verimi (kg da-1), sindirilebilir kuru madde verimi, ağırlıkça botanik kompozisyon oranları (%), toplam oransal verim, alan eşdeğerlilik oranı ve baklagillerin tahıllara oranı belirlenmiştir. Çalışma iki yıl boyunca yürütülmüş ve ortalama değerler hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmada mürdümük tohum oranındaki artışa bağlı olarak yeşil ot verimi, kuru ot verimi ve ham protein verimi artmıştır. Her iki yılda da saf arpa, tritikale ve yulaf, %20 mürdümük +%80 arpa karışımının kuru ot verimi yüksek olmasına rağmen, saf mürdümük ve %60 mürdümük +%40 arpa karışımının ham protein verimi yüksek bulunmuştur. 20% mürdümük + %80 arpanın verim ve kalite özellikleri birlikte değerlendirildiğinde yüksek verim ve kalitede kaba yem elde etmek için %60 mürdümük +%40 arpa karışımı önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldıztekin, C., Polat, T. (2025). Determination of forage yield and quality parameters of different mixture ratios of grass pea and various cereal forage crops. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4, 697–706. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.1749230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Arslan, Y., Trak,D.,Yıldırım,B.,Genç,H.,&Kendüzler,E., (2018). Chemical composition of seeds of two endemic Lathyrus L. species from Turkey.Journal of Biology and Life Science,9(2) 67. https://doi.org/10.5296/jbls.v9i2.12920
  2. Artan, H., & Polat, T. (2019). Determination of forage quality values in pure and mixed sowing of alfalfa with some perennial warm season wheatgrass forage crop species under Şanlıurfa irrigated conditions. Harran University Veterinary Faculty Journal, 8(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.31196/2019/5925767
  3. Avcı, M. (2000). Determination of winter perennial wheat legume forage crops mixtures that can be grown for temporary artificial pasture in Çukurova.PhD thesis, Çukurova University. Institute of Science and Technology. 73-84p.
  4. Ay, I., & Mut, H. (2017). Determination of suitable mixing ratio of common vetch and fodder pea with barley and oats. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 5(2), 55–62. ISSN: 2147–8384.
  5. Başbağ, M., & Peker, C. (2003). A research on the effect of different row spacing and seed quantity on seed yield and some yield criteria in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) under Diyarbakır conditions. In Turkey V. Field Crops Congress, Diyarbakır, Turkey. 438- 443.
  6. Bayram, G., Budaklı, E., Türk, M., & Çelik, N. (2004). A research on yield and adaptation of common damson (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines grown in Bursa ecological conditions. Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 18(2), 73–84. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/154019
  7. Bingöl, N. T., Karslı, M. A., Yılmaz, I. H., & Bolat, D. (2007). The effects of planting time and combination on the nutrient composition and digestible dry matter yield of four mixtures of vetch varieties intercropped with barley.Turkısh Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 31(5), 297–302. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/vol31/iss5/3
  8. Bucak, B. (2009). Determination of seed yield of damson (Lathyrus spp.) lines under barren conditions. Harran University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 13(4), 57–65.
  9. Büyükkılıç, M. C., & Polat, T. (2022). Determination of forage quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in appropriate mixture ratios with some cool season grasses in Şanlıurfa conditions. ADYUTAYAM Journal, 10(1), 65–74.
  10. Çınar, S. (2012). Determination of suitable mixtures of some perennial warm season wheat forage crops with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Çukurova basal conditions.PhD thesis, University of Çukurova. Department of Field Crops.
  11. De Wit, C. T., & Van den Bergh, J. P. (1965). Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 13(2), 212–221.
  12. Gedik, A. (2007). A research on the determination of morphological, agronomic and molecular differences among some damson (Lathyrus sativus L.) varieties, lines and cultivars. Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Field Crops.
  13. General Directorate of Meteorology. (2024). Meteorological statistics for provinces and districts. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/data-assessment/province-and-provinces- statistics.aspx?m=SANLIURFA
  14. Gennatos, K., & Lazaridou, T. B. (2021). Silage yield and protein content of forage legumes intercropping with cereals in two spatial arrangements. Agrofor., 6(3), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.7251/AGRENG2103111GUDC
  15. Gibson, D.J.(2009).Grasses and grassland ecology.Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220111003703542
  16. İptaş, S., & Karadağ, Y. (2003). Determination of seed yield and some yield criteria of different seed amounts of big fig (Vicia narbonensis L.) under Tokat-Kazova conditions. 5th Field Crops Congress of Turkey.
  17. Karadağ, Y., & Büyükburç, U. (2003). Effects of seed rates on forage production, seed yield and hay quality of annual legume-barley mixtures.Turkısh Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27(3), 169–174. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/vol27/iss3/6
  18. Kendir, H. (1999). Seed yields and yield components of common chickling (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(3), 73–81.
  19. Kendir, H. (2000). Seed yield and some vegetative characteristics of vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000941
  20. Kır, H. (2014). The effects of different mowing times and mixture ratios on the yield and quality of Hungarian vetch and grain mixtures in Kirşehir conditions.PhD thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University. Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Field Crops.
  21. Kır, H. (2021). Forage yield and quality of Hungarian vetch mixture with oat varieties under rainfed conditions. Turkısh Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 45(3), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-2005-45
  22. Kızılşimşek, M., & Erol, A. (2000). Area equivalence ratio, competition index and nutrient supply index in growing forage crops as mixtures. Journal of Science and Engineering, 3(1), 14–22.
  23. Oruç, A., & Avcı, M. (2024a). The effect of molasses addition on the silage quality of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz) + triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm) mixture grown as intercrop in cotton cultivation. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(2), 400– 413. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11904700
  24. Oruç, A., & Avcı, M. (2024b). Investigation of the effect of different ratios of molasses addition to field pea (Pisum arvense L.) + barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture grown as second crop in Şanlıurfa conditions on silage quality. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(3), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13253371
  25. Özdemir, S., Kökten, K., Kaplan, M., & Uçar, R. (2020). Determination of seed yield and some traits affecting seed yield of some damsel (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes under Elazığ conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, 7(2), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.725843
  26. Papanaoum, G., Bouloumpasi, E., & Lazaridou, T. B. (2020). Silage yield and protein content of forage legumes intercropping with cereals. Agrofor., 5(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.7251/AGRENG2002072P
  27. Parlak, A. Ö., & Göçmen, N. (2017). Determination of mixing ratios of barley, oat and triticale with fodder pea. ÇOMÜ Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 5(1), 119–124.
  28. Sabancı, C. O., Kır, H., Yavuz, T., Karayel, A. I., & Başköy, S. (2016). The effect of different row spacing practices on herbage yield and quality of damson (Lathyrus sativus L.). Anatolia: Journal of AARI, 26(2), 1–13.
  29. Sağlamtimur, T., Gülcan, H., Tükel, T., Tansı, V., Anlarsal, A. E., & Hatipoğlu, R. (1986). Adaptation trials of forage crops under Çukurova conditions. Çukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 1(3), 37–51.
  30. Sayar, M. S. (2014). Herbage yield performances of some annual leguminous forage crops under the ecological conditions of Çınar district and determination of their possibilities to be included in crop rotation. Journal of Dicle University Institute of Science and Technology, 3(1), 19–28.
  31. Sayar, S. M., Han, Y., Yolcu, H & Yücel, H. (2014). Yield and quality traits of some perennial forages as both sole crops and intercropping mixtures under irrigated conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops,19(1), 59-65.
  32. Seydoşoğlu, S., Saruhan, V., Kökten, K., & Karadağ, Y. (2015). Determination of yield and yield components of some damson (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes under Diyarbakır ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University (JAFAG), 32(3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag863
  33. Smetham, M. L. (1990). The conservation of herbage as hay or silage. In R. H. M. Langer (Ed.), Pastures: Their ecology and management. Oxford University Press. pp.337-369.
  34. Taşkın, S. (1975). Adaptation of meadow pasture and forage crops in Çukurova. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Topraksu, Tarsus Regional Topraksu Research Institute Directorate Publications, 69.
  35. Tripathi, K., Gore, P. G., Ramya, K. R., & Sarker, A. (2022). Grass pea an inherent abiotic stress-tolerant legume: Current status and future scope under changing environment. In Developing climate resilient grain and forage legumes. Springer Nature Singapore. 125– 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9848-4_6
  36. Tükel, T., Hatipoğlu, R., Polat, T., Can, E., Yılmaz, Ş., Çeliktaş, N., & Kökten, K. (2001). Researches on grass yields of some perennial leguminous and wheatgrass forage crops under irrigated conditions of Çukurova and Southeastern Anatolia regions. GAP II. Agricultural Congress. Şanlıurfa.
  37. Uzun, A., & Halil, D. S. (2019). Grain yield and some quality characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes grown under Bursa ecological conditions. Bursa Uludag University Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 33(2), 293–305.
  38. Yavuz, T. (2017). Effects of different mowing times on herbage yield and quality of fodder pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) mixtures. Journal of Central Research Institute of Field Crops, 26(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.323592
  39. Yücel, C., Avcı, M., Yücel, H., Sevilmiş, U., & Hatipoğlu, R. (2018b). Effects of seed mixture ratio and harvest time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover with triticale. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(8), 5312–5322.
  40. Yücel, C., Çil, A. N., & Çil, A. (2006). Determination of herbage and seed yields of some grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) lines under GAP region conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(3), 109–111.
  41. Yücel, C., İnal, I., Yücel, D., & Hatipoğlu, R. (2018a). Effects of mixture ratio and cutting time on forage yield and silage quality of intercropped berseem clover and Italian ryegrass. Legume Research, 41(6), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-400
  42. Zengin, Ş. Ç. (2022). Determination of appropriate mixture ratio and mowing time in Hungarian vetch and rye mixtures.MSc thesis, University of Kırşehir Ahi Evran University.
  43. Avcı, M. (2000). Determination of winter perennial wheat legume forage crops mixtures that can be grown for temporary artificial pasture in Çukurova.PhD thesis, Çukurova University. Institute of Science and Technology. 73-84p.
  44. Çınar, S. (2012). Determination of suitable mixtures of some perennial warm season wheat forage crops with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Çukurova basal conditions.PhD thesis, University of Çukurova. Department of Field Crops.
  45. Gedik, A. (2007). A research on the determination of morphological, agronomic and molecular differences among some damson (Lathyrus sativus L.) varieties, lines and cultivars. Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Field Crops.
  46. Kır, H. (2014). The effects of different mowing times and mixture ratios on the yield and quality of Hungarian vetch and grain mixtures in Kirşehir conditions.PhD thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University. Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Field Crops.
  47. Sayar, S. M., Han, Y., Yolcu, H & Yücel, H. (2014). Yield and quality traits of some perennial forages as both sole crops and intercropping mixtures under irrigated conditions. Turkish Journal of Field Crops,19(1), 59-65.
  48. Smetham, M. L. (1990). The conservation of herbage as hay or silage. In R. H. M. Langer (Ed.), Pastures: Their ecology and management. Oxford University Press. pp.337-369.