SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3

Relationships between grain yield, phenological periods, and agronomic traits in bread wheat genotypes

Ekmeklik buğday genotiplerinde tane verimi, fenolojik dönemler ve agronomik özellikler arasındaki ilişkiler

Abdulkadir Tanrıkulu(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7559-6097
Tevrican Dokuyucu(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7704-6790
Pages
1080–1091
Publication Date
2026-09-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, Gökkan and Dinç varieties stood out with their high GY and suitable phenological properties under Kahramanmaraş conditions, and it will be beneficial for regional wheat breeding programs and agricultural production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The 2014 and 2016 growing seasons to identify wheat varieties with high grain yield (GY) and suitable phenological traits under the climatic conditions of Kahramanmaraş province, Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 18 bread wheat varieties were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, Gökkan and Dinç varieties stood out with their high GY and suitable phenological properties under Kahramanmaraş conditions, and it will be beneficial for regional wheat breeding programs and agricultural production.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Uyum oranı · tane dolum periyodu · vejetatif periyot

Abstract

The 2014 and 2016 growing seasons to identify wheat varieties with high grain yield (GY) and suitable phenological traits under the climatic conditions of Kahramanmaraş province, Türkiye. A total of 18 bread wheat varieties were included in the study. The GY and yield attributes, phenological periods (VP, GFP, DM), adaptation rates (HR), agronomic characteristics, and their relationships with GY were investigated. According to two-year averages, Gökkan (6.489 kg ha-1) and Dinç (6.361 kg ha-1) varieties exhibited the highest GY, while Karacadağ-98 (4.946 kg ha-1) and Cumhuriyet-75 (4.971 kg ha-1) varieties had the lowest GY. Phenological properties were measured using thermal time, and significant differences were observed among varieties. Adaptation rates, calculated using the GFPtt/VPtt ratio (HR), were highest in Tekin (0.610) and Cumhuriyet-75 (0.599) varieties and lowest in Nurkent (0.479) and Pehlivan (0.484) varieties. The correlation between adaptation rate and GY was significant in 2015-2016 and in the two-year average, indicating that varieties with high GY also had high adaptation rates. In conclusion, Gökkan and Dinç varieties stood out with their high GY and suitable phenological properties under Kahramanmaraş conditions, and it will be beneficial for regional wheat breeding programs and agricultural production.

Özet

Kahramanmaraş koşullarında yüksek tane verimi (TV) ve uyumlu fenolojik özelliklere sahip buğday çeşitlerini belirlemek amacıyla 2014-2016 yetişme sezonlarında 18 ekmeklik buğday çeşidi ile çalışma yürütülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, çeşitlerin TV ve verim özellikleri, fenolojik dönemleri (VP, TDP, EOS) ve uyum oranları (HR), agronomik özellikleri ve TV ile ilişkileri incelenmiştir. İki yıllık ortalamalara göre, Gökkan (6.489 kg ha-1) ve Dinç (6.361 kg ha-1) çeşitleri en yüksek TV'yi verirken, Karacadağ-98 (4.946 kg ha-1) ve Cumhuriyet-75 (4.971 kg ha-1) çeşitleri en düşük TV'yi vermiştir. Fenolojik özellikler termal zamanlara bağlı olarak ölçülmüş ve çeşitler arasında önemli farklılıklar gözlemlenmiştir. TDPtt/VPtt oranı (HR) kullanılarak hesaplanan uyum oranları, Tekin (0,610) ve Cumhuriyet-75 (0,599) çeşitlerinde en yüksek, Nurkent (0,479) ve Pehlivan (0,484) çeşitlerinde ise en düşük seviyededir. Uyum oranı ile TV arasındaki korelasyon 2015-2016 yılında ve iki yıllık ortalama için önemli bulunmuştur, Yüksek TV'ye sahip çeşitlerin aynı zamanda yüksek uyum oranına sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, Kahramanmaraş koşullarında Gökkan ve Dinç çeşitleri yüksek TV ve uyumlu fenolojik özelliklere sahip olarak öne çıkmıştır ve bu bölgeye özgü buğday ıslah programları ve tarımsal üretimde faydalı olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tanrıkulu, A., Dokuyucu, T. (2026). Relationships between grain yield, phenological periods, and agronomic traits in bread wheat genotypes. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 1080–1091. https://ajindex.com/articles/1348274

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Anonymous (2008). Technical instructions for agricultural values measurement trials, wheat. General Directorate of Food and Control, Variety Registration and Seed Certification Center, Ankara.
  2. Anonymous (2015). East Mediterranean Transitional Zone Agricultural Research Institute. Analytical Results of the Soil and Water Resources Laboratory, Kahramanmaraş.
  3. Anonymous (2019). Faostat. Accessed: March 16, 2021. [Online]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Akan A, Ünsal N. & Ünsal A. S. (2021). Determination of important parameters affecting yield and quality of durum wheat varieties under dry conditions. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(1): 246-256.
  4. Akkaya, A. (1994). 'Wheat Cultivation' Textbook. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Publications: 1, Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 1, Kahramanmaraş.
  5. Akkaya, A., Dokuyucu, T., Kara R. & Akçura M. (2006). Harmonization ratio of post-pre-anthesis durations by thermal times for durum wheat cultivars in a mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(4):404-408.
  6. Albayrak, Ö., Bayhan, M., Özkan, R. & Akıncı, C. (2022). Evaluation of yield and yield parameters for advanced bread wheat lines. Dicle University Journal of Institute of Natural and Applied Science, 11(1), 173-182.
  7. Bares, I., Sehnolova, J.,Vlasak, M., Vlach, M., Krystof, Z., Amler, P., Maly, J. & Berenek, V. (1985). Descriptors list of Triticum genus, Praha.
  8. Bonhomme, R. (2000). Bases and limits to using ‘Degree-Day’ units. European Journal of Agronomy,13:1-10.
  9. Çağlar, Ö., Öztürk, A. & Bulut, S. (2006). Adaptation of some bread wheat varieties to Erzurum plain conditions. Journal of Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture, 37 (1), 1-7.
  10. Dumlupınar, Z., Kara, R., Sezal, M., İdikut, L., Dokuyucu, T. & Akkaya, A. (2011). The effect of nitrogen rates on harmonization ratio of bread wheat cultivars. KSU J. Nat. Sci., 14(1).
  11. FAO, (2025). World Food Situation: Cereal Supply and Demand Brief. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Access Date: 03.04.2026. https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/.
  12. Gebeyehou, G., Knott, D. R. & Baker, R. J. (1982a). Relationships among durations of vegetative and grain filling phases, yield components and grain yield in durum wheat cultivars. Crop Science, 22:287-290.
  13. Gebeyehou, G., Knott, D. R. & Baker, R. J. (1982b). Rate and duration of filling in durum wheat cultivars. Crop Science, 22:337-340.
  14. Güngör, H. & Dumlupınar, Z. (2019). Evaluation of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for yield, yield components and quality traits in Bolu conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 6(1), 44-51.
  15. Güngör, H., Çakır, M. F. & Dumlupınar, Z. (2022). Evaluation of advanced bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) lines in terms of yield, yield components and quality traits. European Journal of Science and Technology, (35) 123-127.
  16. Kahraman, T., Güngör, H., Öztürk, İ., İlker, Y. & Dumlupınar, Z. (2021). Evaluating the effects of genotype and environment on yield and some quality parameters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using principal component and GGE Biplot analyses. KSU J. Agric Nat, 24(5), 992-1002.
  17. Kara R., Dumlupınar Z., Akkaya A. & Dokuyucu T. (2008). Evaluation of some durum wheat genotypes in terms of phenological periods, some crop characteristics and grain yield under Kahramanmaraş conditions. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 11(1): 104-111.
  18. Kara, R., Dalkılıç, A. Y., Gezginç, H. & Yılmaz, M. F. (2016). Evaluation of some bread wheat varieties in terms of yield and yield elements under Kahramanmaraş conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 3(2), 172-183.
  19. Kendal, E., Tekdal, S., Aktaş, H. & Karaman, M. (2012). Comparison of some durum wheat varieties in terms of yield and quality parameters under Diyarbakır and Adıyaman irrigated conditions. Uludag University, Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 26(2), 1-14.
  20. Keser, M. & Ekingen, H. R. (1994). Grain filling time and rate in winter wheat. Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April, Izmir Plant Breeding Proceedings, Bornova/Izmir.
  21. Kırtok, Y., Genç, İ. & Çölkesen, M. (1987). Studies on the main agricultural characters of some barley varieties of Icarda origin under Çukurova conditions. Turkey Cereal Symposium, pp. 83-89, Bursa.
  22. Koç S. & Çifci E. A. (2022). Investigation of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines and varieties for some agricultural characteristics in different environments. Bursa Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 36(1),103-118.
  23. Lopez Castaneda, C. & Richards, R. A. (1994). Variation in temperate cereals in rain fed environments. Part II. Phasic Development and Growth. Field Crops Res., 37, 63-75.
  24. Migliorini, P., Spagnolo, S., Torri, L., Arnoulet, M., Lazzerinic, G. & Ceccarelli, S. (2016). Agronomic and quality characteristics of old, modern and mixture wheat varieties and landraces for organic bread chain in diverse environments of northern Italy. European Journal Agronomy, 79, 131-141.
  25. Mou & Kronstad, W. E. (1989). Duration and rate of grain filling and subsequent grain yield in wheat. Agron. Abst.,October, 15-20, 93.
  26. Murphy, K. M., Dawson, J. C. & Jones, S. S. (2008). Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Research, 105(1), 107-115.
  27. Özen, S. & Akman, Z. (2015). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of some bread wheat varieties under Yozgat ecological conditions. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture, 10(1),35-43.
  28. Özkan, R. (2022). Evaluation of advanced bread wheat lines grown under rainfall conditions in Diyarbakır. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(3), 583-590.
  29. Öztürk, A. & Akkaya, A. (1994). Relationships between vegetative period, grain filling period and grain filling rate and yield and yield elements in winter wheat genotypes. Ege Unv. Zir. Faculty, Department of Field Crops, Field Crops Science Association, TUBITAK and ÜSİGEM, Field Crops Congress, 25-29 April. Agronomy Proceedings, Volume I, pp. 48-51, Bornova, Izmir.
  30. Richards, R. A. (1989). Breeding for drought resistance physiological approaches, in drought resistance in cereals. F. W. G. Baker, Ed., p. 65, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  31. Protic, R., Miric, M., Protic, N., Jovanovic, Z. & Jovin, P. (2007). The test weight of several winter wheat genotypes under various sowing dates and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Romanian Agricultural Research, 24, 43-36.
  32. SAS Institute, (1999). SAS/STAT User’s Guide.8th Version, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
  33. Shorter, R., Lawn R. J. & Hammer, G. L. (1991). Improving genotypic adaptation in crops-a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture, 27(2), 155-175.
  34. Tosun, M., Ergin, İ. Z. & Soya, H. (1989). Üç mısır çeşidindeki tepe püskülü süresinin G.D.D. (Growing Degree Days) ile ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 26(2).
  35. TUIK, 2025. Crop Production Istatistics. Access Date: 06.05.2026. [Online]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/.
  36. Wiegand, C. L., Gebermann, A. H. & Cuellar, J. A. (1981). Development and yield of hard red winter wheats under semitropical conditions. Agronomy Journal, 73(1):29-37.
  37. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421.