SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Europeanization of Union Rights: A comparative analysis between Turkey and Croatia

Zühal Ünalp Çepel
Pages
355–366
Publication Date
2015-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Freedom of Association; Trade Unions; Social Dialogue; Turkey; Croatia

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Europeanization process has a considerable impact on the fundamental rights within the candidate and member countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this framework, reforms on union rights in the domestic realm have been one of the significant determinants of Europeanization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Freedom of Association; Trade Unions; Social Dialogue; Turkey; Croatia
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Freedom of Association · Trade Unions · Social Dialogue

Abstract

The Europeanization process has a considerable impact on the fundamental rights within the candidate and member countries. Within this framework, reforms on union rights in the domestic realm have been one of the significant determinants of Europeanization. Turkey’s harmonization process with the European Union (EU) acquis started in 1999 with Helsinki Summit. In this process, it seems to be essential to make more reforms on union rights. Considering Copenhagen criteria, the problems dealing with this issue pose a serious obstacle to the membership process of Turkey. On the other hand, Croatia which became a candidate country in 2004 and was granted the membership status in 2013, passed through a rapid harmonization process on union rights. The paper is based on the Europeanization literature in defining union rights. It is aimed to find answers to the questions of which steps were taken in Turkey and Croatia within the context of freedom of association and social dialogue, why Croatia came a long way in those matters although the country started negotiations with the EU much later than Turkey. Keywords: Freedom of Association; Trade Unions; Social Dialogue; Turkey; Croatia

🔖

Cite This Article

Çepel, Z. Ü. (2015). Europeanization of Union Rights: A comparative analysis between Turkey and Croatia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.106425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Balkır, C. & Aknur, M. (2015). Different Trajectories yet the Same Substance: Croatia and Turkey. Anne Wetzel and Jan Orbie (Ed.s) in The Substance of EU Democracy Promotion (85-103). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Börzel, T. A. (2011). When Europeanization Hits Limited Statehood. KFG Working Paper Series. 30, 1-17, Advance online publication. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/kfgeu/kfgwp/wpseries/WorkingPaperKFG_30.pdf
  3. Börzel, T. A. & Risse, T. (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration online Papers. 4 (15), 1-20.
  4. Cerami, A. (2008). Europeanization and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Eu-rope. François Bafoil and Timm Beichelt (Eds.). in Européanisation D’Ouest en Est. Coll. Logiques Politiques (137-168). Paris: L’Harmattan.
  5. Čehulić-Vukadinović, L. (2013) Croatia’s Entry into the European Union and Per-spectives of Further EU Enlargement to the Western Balkans. Megatrend Re-view. 10 (3), 49-64.
  6. Cierco, T. (2009). Europeanization Impact on Croatia’s Course to Democracy. Pri-mavera. 4 (122), 173-201.
  7. Council of Europe. (2013). Croatia and the European Social Charter. http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/socialcharter/countryfactsheets/Croatia_en.pdf
  8. Council of Europe. (1997). The Right to Organize and to Bargain Collectively Protection Within the European Social Charter. Human Rights Social Charter Monographs (Report No: 5). Brussels: Council of Europe Publishing.
  9. Cvijetic, S. (1999) News Review for Croatia. Central Europe Review, 1 (19). Advance online publication. http://www.ce-review.org/99/19/croatianews19.html
  10. Dağı, İ. (1997). İnsan Hakları ve Demokratikleşme: Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkilerinde Siyasal Boyut. Atilla Eralp (Ed.) in Türkiye ve Avrupa (Batılılaşma Kalkınma Demokrasi, (121–176). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  11. Dereli, T. (2013). 6356 Sayılı Yeni Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu: Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Çalışma ve Toplum. 1, 41-64.
  12. Dinler, D. Ş. (2012). Trade Unions in Turkey. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Advance online publication. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/09536-20121221.pdf
  13. European Commission. (2012). Communication from the Commission to the Euro-pean Parliament and the Council on the Main Findings of the Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Croatia’s state of preparedness for EU Membership. COM(2012) 601. Brussels.
  14. European Commission. (2011). Consulting European Social Partners: Understanding How it Works. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId =7208&langId=en
  15. European Commission. Croatia 2005- 2011 Progress Reports. Brussels.
  16. European Commission. Screening Report Croatia. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/croatia/screening_reports/screening_report_19_hr_internet_en.pdf
  17. European Commission. Social Dialogue. Advance online publication. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=329&langId=en
  18. European Commission. (2004) Strategy Paper of the European Commission on Pro-gress in the Enlargement Process. COM(2004) 657 final. Brussels.
  19. European Commission. Turkey 1998-2014 Progress Reports, Brussels.
  20. Eurofound. (2012) Croatia: Industrial Relations Profile. Advance online publication. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/country/croatia.pdf
  21. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. http://www.eucharter.org/home.php? page_id=1
  22. Featherstone, K. & Radaelli C. (Ed.s). (2003). The Politics of Europeanization. Ox-ford University Press.
  23. Grdesic, M. (2008). Mapping the Paths of the Yugoslav Model: Labour Strength and Weakness in Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia. European Journal of Industrial Relations. 14 (2), pp. 133-151.
  24. Gülmez, M. (2007). Gözden Geçirilmiş Avrupa Sosyal Şartına Uyum Sağlayabilecek miyiz? Çalışma ve Toplum. 1, 27-52.
  25. Güray, M. (2013) Avrupa Birliği’nde Sosyal Diyalog. Çalışma Dünyası Dergisi. 1 (1), 144-158.
  26. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Or-der. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  27. ILO Official Journal. (2012) Turkey-Law on Trade Unions and Collective Labour Agreements. Law No. 6356, 28460. Advance online publication. http://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/MONOGRAPH/91814/106961/F2018685492/TUR91814%20Eng.pdf
  28. ILO, Social Dialogue. Advance online publication. http://www.ilo.org/ipec/Action/social-dialogue/lang--en/index.htm
  29. International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC). (2010). Internationally Recog-nised Core Labour Standards in Croatia. Report for the WTO General Council Review of the Trade Policies of Croatia. Geneva. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/CLC_Croatia.pdf
  30. Kaczorowska, A. (2011). European Union Law. London, New York: Routledge.
  31. Kaliber, A. (2013). Contextual and Contested: Reassessing Europeanization in the Case of Turkey. International Relations. 27(52), 52-73.
  32. Office for Social Partnership in Croatia. (2010). Social Dialogue in the Republic of Croatia. http://www.aicesis.org/IMG/doc_101122_Social_Dialogue_ in_Croatia.doc
  33. Official Journal of the European Union. (2010). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Advance online publication. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083: 0047:0200:en:PDF
  34. Pavić-Rogošić, L. (2008). Civil and Social Dialogue in Croatia. Advance online publication. http://www.odraz.hr/media/69001/civil%20and%20social% 20dialogue%20in%20croatia.pdf
  35. Pezelj, A. M. (2011). Annual Review 2010 on Labour Relations and Social Dialogue in South East Europe: Croatia, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Advance online publication. www.fessoe.de
  36. Poloski Vokic, N. and Obadic, A. (2014). The Future of Trade Unions in Croatia – Various Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Transfer. 20 (4), 521-536.
  37. Public Services International. (2012) Global Unions Urge Turkish President to Veto New Trade Law. Advance online publication. http://www.world-psi.org/en/global-unions-urge-turkish-president-veto-new-trade-union-law
  38. Sime-Sen. (2013). Sendikal Yasağın Kalkma Süreci ve Sime-Sen. Advance online publication. http://www.simesen.org.tr/tarihce.html
  39. Sime-Sen Yargı Süreci. http://simesen.org.tr/kapatma-davasi-dosyalari.html
  40. Schimmelfennig, F. & Sedelmeier U. (2005). Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. USA: Cornell University Press.
  41. Sedelmeier, U. (2011). Europeanization in New Member and Candidate States. Liv-ing Reviews in European Governance. 6 (1), 5-32.
  42. Seperic, D. (2014). 2013 Annual Review of Labour Relations and Social Dialogue in South East Europe: Croatia. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Advance online publication. www.fessoe.de
  43. Stubbs, P., Zrinšèak, S. (2005). Extended Social Europe? Social Policy, Social Inclu-sion and Social Dialogue in Croaita and the European Union. Katarina Ott (Ed.) in Croatian Accession to the European Union: Facing the Challenges of Negotiations. (161-184). Zagreb.
  44. T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Konsey. Advance online publication. http://esk.dpt.gov.tr/ESK.portal
  45. The Minimum Wage Board. Advance online publication. http://industrialrelationsinturkey.com/social-dialogue-institutions/the-minimum-wage-board/
  46. Tocci, N. (2009). Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?. South European Society and Politics. 10 (1), 73-83.
  47. Usul, A. R. (2011). Democracy in Turkey. The Impact of EU Political Conditionality. London, New York: Routledge.
  48. Vaughan, B. & Kilcommins, S. (2007). The Europeanization of Human Rights: An Obstacle to Authoritarian Policing in Ireland. European Journal of Criminolo-gy. 4 (4), 437-460.