SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yeni Medya / 2026 / Sayı: 20

Click, Watch, Enjoy! But Which Platform Is More User-Friendly

Tıkla, İzle, Keyif Al! Ama Hangi Platform Daha Kullanıcı Dostu?

Faruk Dursun(SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1571-1107
Journal
Yeni Medya
Pages
67–99
Publication Date
2026-06-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study contributes to usability theory by validating MAUS in a non-Western context and provides actionable insights for developers to enhance user retention through design optimization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the proliferation of mobile applications, understanding the mechanisms through which usability influences user loyalty remains inadequately explored, particularly in non-Western contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 477 digital platform users across Turkey through a cross-sectional survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study contributes to usability theory by validating MAUS in a non-Western context and provides actionable insights for developers to enhance user retention through design optimization.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliği · Devam Etme Niyeti · Kullanıcı Sadakati

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of mobile applications, understanding the mechanisms through which usability influences user loyalty remains inadequately explored, particularly in non-Western contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining the relationships among mobile application usability, continuance intention, and user loyalty using the Mobile Application Usability Scale (MAUS). Data were collected from 477 digital platform users across Turkey through a cross-sectional survey. Advanced statistical analyses including confirmatory factor analysis, ANOVA, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed. The MAUS scale demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.993) and explained 93% of variance across ten dimensions. SEM results revealed that usability significantly predicts continuance intention (β = 0.927, R² = 0.859, p < .001), which in turn strongly influences user loyalty (β = 0.880, R² = 0.774, p < .001). Multiple regression identified continuance intention (β = 0.467), Gestalt principles (β = 0.428), and transition design (β = -0.266) as significant predictors of loyalty (R² = 0.844). Female users rated aesthetic and control dimensions significantly higher than males (p < .001), while postgraduate-educated users showed greater design awareness. IT professionals exhibited significantly higher usability evaluations compared to other occupational groups. Daily platform users demonstrated elevated loyalty levels compared to less frequent users. These findings establish a validated causal pathway (usability → intention → loyalty) and underscore the critical role of human-centered design in mobile application success. The study contributes to usability theory by validating MAUS in a non-Western context and provides actionable insights for developers to enhance user retention through design optimization.

Özet

Mobil uygulamaların yaygınlaşmasına rağmen, kullanılabilirliğin kullanıcı sadakatini etkileyen mekanizmaların anlaşılması, özellikle Batı dışı bağlamlarda, yeterince araştırılmamıştır. Bu çalışma, Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirlik Ölçeği (MAUS) kullanarak mobil uygulama kullanılabilirliği, devam etme niyeti ve kullanıcı sadakati arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyerek bu boşluğu ele almaktadır. Veriler, Türkiye genelinde 477 dijital platform kullanıcısından kesitsel bir anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, ANOVA, çoklu regresyon ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (SEM) gibi ileri istatistiksel analizler kullanılmıştır. MAUS ölçeği mükemmel güvenilirlik göstermiş (α = 0,993) ve on boyutta varyansın %93'ünü açıklamıştır. SEM sonuçları, kullanılabilirliğin devam niyetini önemli ölçüde öngördüğünü (β = 0,927, R² = 0,859, p < 0,001) ve bunun da kullanıcı sadakatini güçlü bir şekilde etkilediğini (β = 0,880, R² = 0,774, p < 0,001) ortaya koymuştur. Çoklu regresyon, devam etme niyetini (β = 0,467), Gestalt ilkelerini (β = 0,428) ve geçiş tasarımını (β = -0,266) sadakatin önemli belirleyicileri olarak tanımladı (R² = 0,844). Kadın kullanıcılar, estetik ve kontrol boyutlarını erkeklerden önemli ölçüde daha yüksek puanladı (p < .001), lisansüstü eğitim almış kullanıcılar ise tasarım bilincinin daha yüksek olduğunu gösterdi. BT uzmanları, diğer meslek gruplarına kıyasla önemli ölçüde daha yüksek kullanılabilirlik değerlendirmeleri sergiledi. Günlük platform kullanıcıları, daha az sıklıkta kullananlara kıyasla daha yüksek sadakat seviyeleri gösterdi. Bu bulgular, doğrulanmış bir nedensel yol (kullanılabilirlik → niyet → sadakat) oluşturur ve mobil uygulamaların başarısında insan merkezli tasarımın kritik rolünü vurgular. Bu çalışma, MAUS'u Batı dışı bir bağlamda doğrulayarak kullanılabilirlik teorisine katkıda bulunmakta ve geliştiricilere tasarım optimizasyonu yoluyla kullanıcı tutma oranını artırmak için uygulanabilir içgörüler sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dursun, F. (2026). Click, Watch, Enjoy! But Which Platform Is More User-Friendly. Yeni Medya, Sayı: 20, 67–99. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1877962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (91)

  1. Adinda, P. P. & Suzianti, A. (2018). Redesign of user interface for e-government application using usability testing method. ICCIP 2018, 145-149. http://doi.org/10.1145/3290420.3290433
  2. Afif, M. H. (2021). Evaluating PSAU mobile application based on people at the center of mobile application development (PACMAD) usability model: Empirical investigation. Journal of Computer Science, 17(3), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2021.275.283.
  3. Ahmad, N. A. N. & Hussaini, M. (2021). A usability testing of a higher education mobile application among postgraduate and undergraduate students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(09), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i09.19943
  4. Akbar, A. R., Fikri, M. G. H., Putra, N. D., Sunardi & Hariman, A. (2024). Comparing the user experience of mobile banking applications using system usability scale and usability testing. 9th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR61386.2024.10875913
  5. Akçakaya, A., Diri, S. & Şahin, S. (2023). Kocaeli Üniversitesi öğrenci bilgi sistemi mobil uygulamasının kullanılabilirliği. Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi, 8(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.57120/yalvac.1257634
  6. Akçakaya, A., Diri, S., Şahin, S. & Sayrım Yıkılmazçınar, R. (2022). Panic button mobile application usability study. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, 4(2), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.47933/ijeir.1085846
  7. Alayed, D. (2025). Are Saudi Arabian banks’ mobile applications accessible for blind or partially sighted users?: A customers’ perspective and evaluation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24, 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01082-y
  8. Ali, W., Riaz, O., Mumtaz, S., Khan, A. R., Saba, T. & Bahaj, S. A. (2022). Mobile application usability evaluation: A study based on demography. IEEE Access, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166893.
  9. Al-Khalifa, H. S., Al-Twaim, B. & AlHarbi, B. (2016). A heuristic checklist for usability evaluation of Saudi government mobile applications. 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services, (pp. 375-378). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3011141.3011189
  10. Alturki, R. & Gay, V. (2017). Usability testing of fitness mobile application: Methodology and quantitative results. 7th International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering & Applications, (pp. 1-19). CS & IT-CSCP https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2017.71108.
  11. Alturki, R. & Gay, V. (2019). Usability Attributes for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review, Recent Trends and Advances in Wireless and IoT-enabled Networks, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99966-1_5.
  12. Amalia, I. N., Said, F. B. M. & Nambiar, N. (2025). The usability and feasibility testing of tele-heart nursing Care/TNCA digital application for preventing 30 days re-admission among heart failure patients. Holistic Nursing Plus, 3(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.58439/hnp.v3i1.306.
  13. Amiruddin, A., Dewi, R.S. & Widodo, E. (2017). Structural modeling for usability attributes on technology acceptance model for smart parking mobile application. Materials Science and Engineering, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1072/1/012024
  14. Anggraeni, M. D., Triyanto, E., Iskandar, A., Fatoni, A. & Niyomdecha, N. (2025). Usability test of the “Denia-IS” mobile application for sustainability high-risk pregnancy early detection in rural areas. 7th International Conference on Multidiscipline Approaches for Sustainable Rural Development (ICMA SURE 2024), (pp.1-5). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560904003.
  15. Armour, T., Coffey, E., Manias, E., Redley, B., & Nicholson, P. (2025). Development of mobile educational applications designed for nurses: A narrative review. Nurse Education Today, 147, 106576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106576
  16. Aydoğan, E., Atik, A. D., Dikmen, Ş. & Erkoç, F. (2022). Development and usability testing of an educational mobile learning app for climate change and health impacts. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 47(3), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0350.
  17. Baharuddin, R., Singh, D. & Razali, R. (2013). Usability dimensions for mobile applications-a review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(6), 2225–2231.
  18. Balagtas-Fernandez, F. & Hussmann, H. (2009). A methodology and framework to simplify usability analysis of mobile applications, 24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, (pp. 520–524). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2009.12.
  19. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  20. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
  21. Caro-Alvaro, S., García-López, E., García-Cabot, A. & Mavri, A. (2025). Measuring the effects of usability recommendations for mobile instant messaging apps on user performance and user behaviour. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 608-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2303553.
  22. Chi, N. C., Demir, I., Perkhounkova, Y. Wolf, M. & Herr, K. (2025). Usability testing of the PACE-App to support family caregivers in managing pain for people with dementia. The Gerontologist, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae163
  23. Citoler, A. P., Lee, J. & Lee, E. (2025). ExSnus: A persuasive mobile health application for Snus Cessation. 18th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2025), 1, (pp. 1105-1116). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0013398100003911
  24. Ciudad-Gutiérrez, P., Suárez-Casillas, P., Alfaro-Lara E., Santos-Rubio, M. D., Santos-Ramos, B. & Guisado-Gil, A. B. (2025). ConciliaMed: An interactive mobile and web tool to reconcile chronic medications of patients undergoing elective surgery. BMJ Health Care Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101256.
  25. Dahri, N. A., Vighio, M. S., Al-Rahm, W., M. & Alismaiel, O. A. (2022). Usability evaluation of mobile app for the sustainable professional development of teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(16), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i16.32015.
  26. Dellon, E. S., Furuta, G. T., Tomeo, N., Karavanov, A., Smernoff, Z., Harrington, J. & Aceves, S. S. (2025). Usability of a mobile point-of-care app for the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Gastro Hep Advances, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100604
  27. Dewi, R. K., Priandani, N. D., Brata, K. C. & Fanani, L. (2018). Usability evaluation of mobile-based application for Javanese script learning media. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 3(1), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.20183146
  28. Drofa, D. (2025). Integrating Advanced API Solutions into Full-Stack Web and Mobile Applications to Optimise User Experience. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 8, 2086-2100. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V8-i5-16
  29. Eva, N., Ar-Robbaniy, F. H., Praherdhiono, H. & Pramono, E. (2024). The experience of students of State University Of Malang (Um) on the Sipejar mobile application using the usability testing method. International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities, (pp. 2534-2543). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-317-7_221.
  30. Faizrakhmanov, R., Bahrami, M. R., & Platunov, A. (2025). Prototype, method, and experiment for evaluating usability of smart home user interfaces. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 92, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2024.103903
  31. Faudzi, M. A., Cob, Z. C., Omar, R. & Sharudin, S. A. (2022). Evaluating learning management system based on PACMAD usability model: Brighten mobile application. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(5),614-621.
  32. Fokkema, M., & Greiff, S. (2017). How performing PCA and CFA on the same data equals trouble. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/ a000460
  33. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun H. H. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  34. Ghazizadeh, F. Z. & Vafadar, S. (2017). A Quantitative Evaluation of Usability in Mobile Applications: An Empirical Study. International Symposium on Computer Science and Software Engineering Conference (CSSE), (pp. 25-31). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSICSSE.2017.8320120
  35. Güler, Ç. (2019). A structural equation model to examine mobile application usability and use. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 12(3), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.454749 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  36. Harrison, R., Flood, D. & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science. 1(1), 1-16 Haryanti, M. L., Fraderic, F., Hartono, S. & Salim, J. (2025). Cinema e-Ticket application design and usability evaluation using SUS. Nuansa Informatika, 19(1), 14-22.
  37. Hoehle, H. & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Mobile application usability: Conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Quarterly, (39)2, 435–472. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.08
  38. Hoehle, H., Aljafari, R. & Venkastesh, V. (2016). Leveraging Microsoft's mobile usability guidelines: Conceptualizing and developing scales for mobile application usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 89, 35-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.001
  39. Hu, L., & Bentler, M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). SAGE Publications.
  40. Huang, M., McGrew, G. & Bodine, C. (2025). Social media apps: A paradigm for examining usability of mobile apps for working-age adults with mild-moderate cognitive disabilities. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 18(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3709144
  41. Huang, Z. & Benyoucef, M. (2023). An empirical study of mobile application usability: A unified hierarchical approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2624-2643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2082021
  42. Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E. O. C., JamaIsse, A. & Mohammed, R. A. (2018). Grab mobile application: A usability evaluation. AIP Conference Proceedings, (pp. 1-5). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055456
  43. Ismail, N. A., Ahmad, F., Kamaruddin, N. A. & Ibrahim, R. (2016). A Review on usability issues in mobile applications. IOSR Journal of Mobile Computing & Application, 3(3). 47-52. https://doi.org/10.9790/0050-03034752
  44. ISO (1998). International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11:1998). ISO.
  45. Jha, S., Chan, G., Jewer, S. Agyapong, V., I. O. & Orji, R. (2025). Engaging caregivers in the design of LifeLink: A persuasive mobile application for suicide prevention. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2453608
  46. Juliá-Nehme, B. & Rosell, J. (2025) Interaction and design barriers for older adults in food delivery apps: A usability study, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(9), 5761-5778. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2365484
  47. Kennard, K. A., Anisa, N. & Hentihu, M. T. R. (2024). Enhanced insight into mobile banking: A comprehensive usability analysis through user feedback. International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), (pp. 65-70). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTECH63123.2024.10780846
  48. Konstantinos, D., Evgenia, A., Despoina, C. & Constantina, C. (2020). Usability assessment of agricultural mobile applications in the Greek market. Rjoas, 9(105), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2020-09.01
  49. Kuhnel, M., Seiler, L., Hocal, A. & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Mobile learning analytics in higher education: usability testing and evaluation of an app prototype. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(4), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2018-0024
  50. Li, M. & Zhao, L. (2025) Understanding fashion omnichannel experience through mobile application customer reviews. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 16(1), 90-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2024.2417304
  51. Lin, C. A. (2025). Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a storm preparedness and risk assessment mobile app. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105176
  52. Liu, W., Lin, F., Guo, L., Chen, T. H. & Hassan, A. E. (2025). GUIWatcher: Automatically detecting GUI lags by analyzing mobile application screencasts. 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-SEIP 2025), (pp. 1-11). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04202
  53. Lubis, T. A., Irawan, M. D., & Muthi, D. I. (2025). Designing a mobile-based employee information system using the design thinking approach. Bigint Computing Journal, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55537/bigint.v3i1.988
  54. MacCallum, R., C. & Widaman, K. F. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4 (1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84.
  55. Marques A.D.B, Moreira T.M.M, Jorge T.V, Rabelo S.M.S, Carvalho R.E.F.L & Felipe G.F. (2020). Usability of a mobile application on diabetic foot self-care. Revista Brasileira de Enfermmagem, 73(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0862
  56. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
  57. McCrady, B. S., Woodall, W. G., Berteletti, J., Starling, R., Martinez, L., Westerberg, V., Brooks, M. & Starke, T. (2025). Developing a smartphone web app to help DWI offenders and their families. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209565
  58. Mohtar, S., Jomhari, N., Omar, N. A., Mustafa, M. B. P. & Yusoff, Z. M. (2023). The usability evaluation on mobile learning apps with gamification for middle aged women. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11232-z
  59. Munusamy, I., Abdullah, M. F. N. L. & Rajamanickam, S. (2024). Your additional mathematics coach: Elements of an intelligent mobile application. International Social Science & Educational Conference (ISSEC-24), (pp. 175-180). Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI24.6376
  60. Nacheva, R. (2025). Analysis of AI mobile applications for ensuring digital accessibility in higher education for people with disabilities. Acta Educationis Generalis, 15(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2025-0009.
  61. Namoun, A., Alrehaili, A., Un Nisa, Z., Almoamari, H. & Tufail, A. (2024). Predeiction the usability of mobile applicaitons using AI tool: The rise of large user interface models, oppurtunities and challenges. Procedia Computer Science, 238, 671-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.076
  62. Nuñez, I. Cano, E.E. Cruz, E. Concepción, D. Navarro, N. & Rovetto, C. (2024). Improving usability in mobile apps for residential energy management: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic. Applied Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051751
  63. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  64. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105
  65. Pastucha, M., Gos, E., Kochanek, K., Skarżyński, H. & Jedrzejczak, W., W. (2025). How users of different ages rate a mobile app for self-testing of hearing. medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.27.25321176
  66. Pliakoura,A., Beligiannis,G. & Kontogeorgos,A. (2018). Mobile device applications usability assessment: The example of an agricultural management application. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 9(3), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2018.9.3.460.
  67. Pratama, M. R., Wardai, R. R. K., Haspari, S. S.& Dewi, M. A. (2023). User experience analysis on the Edlink mobile application using usability testing method. 8th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research, (pp. 1-6). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR57571.2023.10147656.
  68. Putra, P. O. H., Dewi, R. A. W. W. C. K. & Budi, I. (2022). Usability factors that drive continued intention to use and loyalty of mobile travel application. Heliyon, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10620.
  69. Rey, W. (2023). Assessing MABIS Mobile app based on people at the center of mobile application development (PACMAD) usability model: Empirical investigation. International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE). (pp. 37-43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTE61649.2023.00014.
  70. Rey, W. P., Del Rosario, E. J., Lasquety, M. K. & Tan, K. A. D. (2023). X-Mech: An on-demand vehicle express repair service mobile application. International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering, (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTE61649.2023.00023.
  71. Rinawiyanti, E. D., Surjani, R. M., Hartono, M., Permatasari, E. P. & Chrisma, A. V. (2025). Mixed method usability testing for user experience and user interface of AI-Based supermarket applications. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 6(1), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.453
  72. RTÜK (2024). Medyametre Kullanım Alışkanlıkları Araştırması. https://www.rtuk.gov.tr/medyametre-medya-kullanim-aliskanliklari-arastirmasi-2024/5060
  73. Saleh, A., Ismail, R., Fabil, N., Norvawi, N. & Wahid, F. A. (2017). Measuring usability: Importance attributesfor mobile applications. American Scientific Publishers Advanced Science Letters, 23(5), 4738-4741. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8879
  74. Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H., & Safia, N. (2021). Handbook of mobile application development: A guide to selecting the right engineering and quality features. Bentham Science Publishers.
  75. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
  76. Sousa, C. S. & Turrini, R. N. T. (2019). Development of an educational mobile application for patients submitted to orthognathic surgery. Revista Latino-Americana Enfermagem, 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2904.3143.
  77. Svensson, P., Lin, S. & Iwaya, L. H. (2025). Usability and accessibility in mHealth stroke apps: An empirical assessment. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2025.101616
  78. Syam, A., Dewi, I. & Firawati, F. (2023). Usability study of the Mommy-Be application: exploring the experience of breastfeeding mothers in eastern Indonesia. Rgsa – Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-089
  79. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.
  80. Tobing, C. I. L. & Sunardi. (2023). User experience analysis of Indonesia train booking mobile application using user experience questionnaire (UEQ) and usability testing. International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTECH59029.2023.10277833
  81. Uslu, D. & Arıkan, G. (2023). Engelsiz Sağlık İletişim Merkezi mobil uygulamasının sistem kullanılabilirlik değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 567-588.
  82. Weichbroth, P. (2019). A mixed-methods measurement and evaluation methodology for mobile application usability studies. Computer Science and Information Systems, 20, 101-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2019F299
  83. Weichbroth, P. (2020) Usability of mobile applications: A systematic literature study. Journals & Magazines, 8, 55563–55577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981892
  84. Weichbroth, P. (2022). An Empirical study on the impact of gender on mobile applications usability. IEEE Access, 10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3219421
  85. Weichbroth, P. (2024) Usability testing of mobile applications: A methodological framework. Applied Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051792
  86. Weichbroth, P. (2025). Usability issues with mobile applications: Insights from practitioners and future research directions. IEEE Access, 13, 91301 – 91311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3573503
  87. Wook, J. J., NeungHoe, K. & Peter, H. I. (2020). Detecting usability problems in mobile applications on the basis of dissimilarity in user behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.10.001
  88. Yanuarsyah, I., Ahmad, S. & Khalid, N. (2023). Usability testing design to increase user experience of a mobile landslide application. Krea-TIF: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 11(2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.32832/krea-tif.v11i2.15160
  89. Zhang, D. & Adipat, B. (2005) Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3):293-308. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_3
  90. Alturki, R. & Gay, V. (2017). Usability testing of fitness mobile application: Methodology and quantitative results. 7th International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering & Applications, (pp. 1-19). CS & IT-CSCP https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2017.71108.
  91. Putra, P. O. H., Dewi, R. A. W. W. C. K. & Budi, I. (2022). Usability factors that drive continued intention to use and loyalty of mobile travel application. Heliyon, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10620.