Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

EFFICIENCY OF MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES IN BRICS-T COUNTRIES

BRICS-T ÜLKELERİNDE PARA VE MALİYE POLİTİKALARININ ETKİNLİĞİ

Pages
60–71
Publication Date
2019-12-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another significant finding obtained from this study is that Turkey shows the same characteristics with BRICS countries, at least in terms of policy efficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The efficiency of monetary and fiscal policies changes frequently with the economic fluctuations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The last great crisis revealed that traditional monetary and fiscal policies are not sufficient and thereby it has brought in the new policy ideas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another significant finding obtained from this study is that Turkey shows the same characteristics with BRICS countries, at least in terms of policy efficiency.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Monetary Policy · Fiscal Policy · BRICS-T

Abstract

The efficiency of monetary and fiscal policies changes frequently with the economic fluctuations. The last great crisis revealed that traditional monetary and fiscal policies are not sufficient and thereby it has brought in the new policy ideas. In this study, the efficiency of monetary and fiscal policies has investigated for BRICS-T countries. Accordingly, money supply and government final consumption expenditure are pro-cyclical. Both economic policies have an impact on economic activity, but fiscal policy appears to be relatively more effective in comparison with monetary policy. Another significant finding obtained from this study is that Turkey shows the same characteristics with BRICS countries, at least in terms of policy efficiency.

Özet

Para ve maliye politikalarının etkinlikleri, ekonomik konjonktürle birlikte sık sık değişmektedir. Yaşanan son büyük kriz, geleneksel para ve maliye politikalarının yeterli olmadıklarını ortaya koymuş ve dolayısıyla yeni politika fikirlerini beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada, para ve maliye politikalarının etkinliği BRICS-T ülkeleri için araştırılmıştır. Buna göre, para arzı ve devlet nihai tüketim harcamaları konjonktürle aynı yönlü hareket etmektedir. Her iki ekonomi politikası ekonomik performans üzerinde etkin olmakla birlikte, maliye politikası para politikasından nispi olarak daha üstün gözükmektedir. Çalışmadan elde edilen diğer bir önemli bulgu ise Türkiye'nin BRICS ülkeleri ile en azından politika etkinliği konusunda aynı özellikleri taşıyor olmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖL, V., BENLİ, A. (2019). EFFICIENCY OF MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES IN BRICS-T COUNTRIES. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 60–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/133771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adeniji, S., & Evans, O. (2013). Searching for the Relative Potency of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Selected African Countries: A Panel Data Approach to St. Louis Equation. Munih Personal RePEc Archive, No. 52420, posted 23. Aigheyisi, O. S. (2011). Examining the Relative Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Nigeria: A Cointegration and Error Correction Approach. Electronic copt avaliable at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1944585
  2. Ajayi, S. I. (1974). An econometric case study of the relative importance of monetary and fiscal policy in Nigeria. The Bangladesh Economic Review, 2(2), 559-576.
  3. Ajisafe, R. A., & Folorunso, B. A. (2002). The relative effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy in macroeconomic management in Nigeria. The African economic and business Review, 3(1), 23-40.
  4. Alavi, S. E., Moshiri, S., & Sattarifar, M. (2016). An Analysis of the Efficiency of the Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Iran Economy Using IS–MP–AS Model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 522-531.
  5. Ali, S., Irum, S., & Ali, A. (2008). Whether fiscal stance or monetary policy is effective for economic growth in case of South Asian Countries?. The Pakistan Development Review, 791-799.
  6. Andersen, L. C., & Jordan, J. L. (1968). Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilization. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. November, 29-44.
  7. Ansari, M. I. (1996). Monetary vs. fiscal policy: Some evidence from vector autoregression for India. Journal of Asian Economics, 7(4), 677-698.
  8. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  9. Bakare-Aremu, T.A. & Osobase, A.O. (2015). Effect of Fiscal and Monetary Policies on Industrial Sector Performance- Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol6(17). Blanchard, O. J., Dell'Ariccia, M. G., & Mauro, M. P. (2013). Rethinking macro policy II: getting granular. IMF Staff Dİscussion Note. SDN/13/03. Blanchard, O., Dell’Ariccia, G., & Mauro, P. (2010). Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(s1), 199-215.
  10. Chowdhury, A. (1989). Monetary and Fiscal Policy as a Stabilization Tool: The Case of Korea and Turkey. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business. Vol. 29, No.1, 33-48.
  11. Chowdhury, L. S., & Afzal, M. N. I. (2015). The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy in Bangladesh. The Journal