SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir Yönetim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Importance Ranking of Performance Criteria in Blockchain Integrated Supply Chains Using The AHP Method

Blokzincir Entegre Tedarik Zincirlerinde Performans Kriterlerinin AHP Yöntemiyle Önem Sıralaması

Serkan Genç(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9520-8466
Hilmi Yüksel(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İŞLETME BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-9723-3526
Pages
18–34
Publication Date
2024-07-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results provide important information to supply chain managers on prioritizing and managing performance criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study addresses the weighting of performance criteria in blockchain integrated supply chains with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aimed to determine the degree of importance that blockchain integrated supply chain managers and academicians attach to performance criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results provide important information to supply chain managers on prioritizing and managing performance criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blokzincir · Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi · Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP)

Abstract

This study addresses the weighting of performance criteria in blockchain integrated supply chains with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The study aimed to determine the degree of importance that blockchain integrated supply chain managers and academicians attach to performance criteria. Ten performance criteria determined based on the SCOR model were evaluated and weighted by taking five expert opinions. The findings show that reliability and perfect order fulfillment criteria are the highest priority, followed by cost management and responsiveness criteria. These results provide important information to supply chain managers on prioritizing and managing performance criteria.

Özet

Bu çalışma, blokzincir entegre tedarik zincirlerinde performans kriterlerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) yöntemiyle ağırlıklandırılmasını ele almaktadır. Çalışmada, blokzincir entegre tedarik zinciri yöneticilerinin ve akademisyenlerinin performans kriterlerine verdikleri önem derecelerini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Beş uzman görüşü alınarak, SCOR modeline dayalı olarak belirlenen on performans kriteri değerlendirilmiş ve ağırlıklandırılmıştır. Bulgular, güvenilirlik ve mükemmel sipariş karşılama kriterlerinin en yüksek önceliğe sahip olduğunu, bunu maliyet yönetimi ve yanıt verebilirlik kriterlerinin takip ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, tedarik zinciri yöneticilerine performans kriterlerinin önceliklendirilmesi ve yönetilmesi konusunda önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Genç, S., Yüksel, H. (2024). Importance Ranking of Performance Criteria in Blockchain Integrated Supply Chains Using The AHP Method. İzmir Yönetim Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.56203/iyd.1502735

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Apics.org.SCOR 12.0 Quick Reference Guide,. Retrieved,11 OCTOBER 2019 AST. http://www.apics.org/docs/defaultsource/scor-p-toolkits/apics-scc-scor-quick-reference-guide.pdf.
  2. Ballou, R. H., & Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Business logistics/supply chain management: planning, organizing, and controlling the supply chain. Pearson Education India.
  3. Basmacı, G. (2022). Prioritizing Challenges in AI Applications in Healthcare: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 12(1), 194-206.
  4. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International journal of operations & production management, 19(3), 275-292.
  5. Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. white paper, 3(37), 2-1.
  6. Chae, B. K. (2009). Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective. Supply chain management: an international journal, 14(6), 422-428.
  7. Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of operations management, 22(2), 119-150.
  8. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2015). Supply chain management: strategy. Planning and Operation, (5th Global ed), Pearson.
  9. Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 37-44.
  10. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Logistics & Supply Chain Management. Pearson UK.
  11. Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied innovation, 2(6-10), 71.
  12. Dahinine, B., Laghouag, A., Bensahel, W., Alsolamy, M., & Guendouz, T. (2024). Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises. Sustainability, 16(6), 2586.
  13. De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2001). Performance measurement systems-models, characteristics and measures. International journal of operations & production management, 21(1/2), 46-71.
  14. Delipinar, G. E., & Kocaoglu, B. (2016). Using SCOR model to gain competitive advantage: A Literature review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 398-406.
  15. Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process—an exposition. Operations research, 49(4), 469-486.
  16. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of operations management, 19(2), 185-200.
  17. Georgise, F. B., Thoben, K. D., & Seifert, M. (2012). Adapting the SCOR model to suit the different scenarios: a literature review & research agenda. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 2.
  18. Gervais, A., Karame, G. O., Capkun, V., & Capkun, S. (2014). Is bitcoin a decentralized currency?. IEEE security & privacy, 12(3), 54-60.
  19. Gervais, A., Karame, G. O., Wüst, K., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., & Capkun, S. (2016, October). On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security (pp. 3-16).
  20. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International journal of production economics, 87(3), 333-347.
  21. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International journal of operations & production Management, 21(1/2), 71-87.
  22. Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial innovation, 2, 1-12.
  23. Hammadi, L., de Cursi, E. S., Barbu, V. S., Ouahman, A. A., & Ibourk, A. (2018). A SCOR model for customs supply chain process design. World Customs Journal, 12(2).
  24. Huang, S. H., Sheoran, S. K., & Keskar, H. (2005). Computer-assisted supply chain configuration based on supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Computers & industrial engineering, 48(2), 377-394.
  25. Israel, B., Mahuwi, L., & Mwenda, B. (2023). A review on financial and non-financial measures of supply chain performance. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 11(1), 17-29.
  26. Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International journal of information management, 50, 302-309.
  27. Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101967.
  28. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance.
  29. Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of information management, 39, 80-89.
  30. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 65-83.
  31. Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan management review, 33(3), 65-73.
  32. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
  33. Mooney, C. (2018). Globalization Why We Care About Faraway Events. Nomad Press.
  34. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
  35. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies.
  36. Nozari, H., & Szmelter, A. (Eds.). (2018). Global supply chains in the pharmaceutical industry. IGI Global.
  37. Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: principles and applications. In Research handbook on digital transformations (pp. 225-253). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  38. Prakash, S., Sandeep Gunjan, S., & Rathore, A. (2013, October). Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model: an overview and a structured literature review of its application. In International Conference on Smart Technologies for Mechanical Engineering (pp. 1-20).
  39. Queiroz, M. M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. H. (2020). Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply chain management: An international journal, 25(2), 241-254.
  40. Ricardianto, P., Barata, F., Mardiyani, S., Setiawan, E., Subagyo, H., Saribanon, E., & Endri, E. (2022). Supply chain management evaluation in the oil and industry natural gas using SCOR model. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 797-806.
  41. Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017). A blockchain research framework: What we (don’t) know, where we go from here, and how we will get there. Business & information systems engineering, 59, 385-409.
  42. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), 1073-1076.
  43. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting resource allocation.
  44. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 6). RWS publications.
  45. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
  46. Saaty, T. L., & Shang, J. S. (2007). Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41(1), 22-37.
  47. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1991). Prediction, projection and forecasting: applications of the analytic hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games and sports.
  48. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International journal of production research, 57(7), 2117-2135.
  49. Saunders, M. (1997). Strategic purchasing and supply chain management. (No Title).
  50. Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Peterson, R. (1998). Inventory management and production planning and scheduling (Vol. 3, p. 30). New York: Wiley.
  51. Stevenson, W. J., Hojati, M., Cao, J., Mottaghi, H., & Bakhtiari, B. (2007). Operations management. McMcGraw-Hill Irwin.
  52. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
  53. Szabo, N. (1997). The idea of smart contracts. Nick Szabo’s papers and concise tutorials, 6(1), 199.
  54. Tian, F. (2017, June). A supply chain traceability system for food safety based on HACCP, blockchain & Internet of things. In 2017 International conference on service systems and service management (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  55. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PloS one, 11(10), e0163477.
  56. Apics.org.SCOR 12.0 Quick Reference Guide,. Retrieved,11 OCTOBER 2019 AST. http://www.apics.org/docs/defaultsource/scor-p-toolkits/apics-scc-scor-quick-reference-guide.pdf.