SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir Yönetim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

A Qualitative Study on the Relationship Between Employee Training and Career Development

Çalışan Eğitimleri ile Kariyer Gelişimi Arasındaki İlişkinin Nitel Bir İncelemesi

Mert Okan Yazıcı(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5577-3914
Pages
47–75
Publication Date
2026-07-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that motivation for participation significantly shapes perceptions of career impact.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today’s business environment, characterized by intensified global competition, sustainable success is closely linked to a qualified workforce and continuous employee development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, the study highlights the role of digitalization and AI-supported learning environments in enhancing career permeability through increased accessibility and personalization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that motivation for participation significantly shapes perceptions of career impact.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eğitimleri · Kariyer Gelişim · Nitel Araştırma

Abstract

In today’s business environment, characterized by intensified global competition, sustainable success is closely linked to a qualified workforce and continuous employee development. This study examines the relationship between employee training and career development not only through tangible outcomes such as promotion, but also as a multidimensional process shaped by the meanings employees attribute to training, their participation motivations, training types, and learning technologies. The conceptual framework draws on Super’s life-span approach, Holland’s RIASEC model, and Schein’s career anchors, emphasizing the relationship between training practices and horizontal and vertical career mobility. In addition, the study highlights the role of digitalization and AI-supported learning environments in enhancing career permeability through increased accessibility and personalization. The research adopts a phenomenological design and is based on semi-structured interviews with 22 employees working in a durable goods company in the Aegean Region, all of whom had experienced career progression within the last 5 years and had participated in at least 10 training programs. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 2025, resulting in 6 main themes. The findings indicate that motivation for participation significantly shapes perceptions of career impact. Employees who perceive training as an investment or development opportunity tend to associate it more strongly with career advancement, whereas technical training is primarily perceived as supporting performance and specialization in current roles. Participants emphasized the importance of personalized, technology-intensive training programs supported by mentoring mechanisms. Overall, the study contributes to the literature by providing a process-oriented and employee-centered understanding of the training–career relationship.

Özet

Küresel rekabetin yoğunlaştığı günümüz iş dünyasında sürdürülebilir başarı, nitelikli insan kaynağı ve çalışanların sürekli gelişimiyle yakından ilişkilidir. Bu çalışma çalışan eğitimleri ile kariyer gelişimi arasındaki ilişkiyi yalnızca terfi gibi somut çıktılar üzerinden değil; çalışanların eğitim deneyimine yükledikleri anlamlar, katılım motivasyonları, eğitim türleri ve eğitim teknolojileri bağlamında çok boyutlu bir süreç olarak ele almaktadır. Kavramsal çerçevede Super’ın yaşam boyu kariyer yaklaşımı, Holland’ın RIASEC modeli ve Schein’in kariyer çapaları temel alınmış; eğitimlerin yatay ve dikey kariyer hareketliliği ile ilişkisi tartışılmıştır. Ayrıca dijitalleşme ve yapay zekâ destekli öğrenme ortamlarının, kişiselleştirme ve erişilebilirlik yoluyla kariyer geçişkenliğini güçlendirdiği vurgulanmıştır. Araştırma fenomenolojik yöntemle yürütülmüş ve Ege Bölgesi’nde dayanıklı tüketim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir işletmede çalışan, son 5 yıl içinde kariyer ilerlemesi yaşamış ve en az 10 eğitime katılmış 22 kişiyle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler MAXQDA 2025 ile analiz edilmiş ve 6 ana tema ortaya konulmuştur. Bulgular eğitime katılım motivasyonunun kariyer katkısı algısını belirgin biçimde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Yönetsel ve kişisel gelişim eğitimleri kariyer ilerlemesiyle daha güçlü ilişkilendirilirken, teknik eğitimler daha çok mevcut iş performansını destekleyen unsurlar olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Katılımcılar kariyer gelişime etki edecek yüksek bir eğitim ekosistemi için kişiselleştirilmiş içerikler, teknoloji yoğun uygulamalar ve mentorluk desteği önerisinde bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yazıcı, M. O. (2026). A Qualitative Study on the Relationship Between Employee Training and Career Development. İzmir Yönetim Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 47–75. https://doi.org/10.56203/iyd.1891244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. American Society for Training and Development. (1981). ASTD State of the Industry Report. ASTD.
  2. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford University Press.
  3. Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. John A. Larusson & B. Brandon White (Eds.), Learning Analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.
  5. Baruch, Y., & Peiperl, M. (2000). Career management practices: An empirical survey and implications. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-050X(200024)39:4
  6. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, With Special Reference to Education (3rd Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bidwell, M., & Keller, J. R. (2025). Stepping sideways to step up: Lateral mobility and career advancement inside organizations. Organization Science, 71(1), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17120
  8. Brown, K. G., & Charlier, S. D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.10.001
  9. Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
  10. Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling. Computers & Education, 146, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
  11. Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of m-learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Zane L. Berge & L. Y. Lin Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of Mobile Learning. Routledge.
  12. DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403
  13. Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
  14. Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.006
  15. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd ed.). Psychological Assessment Resources.
  16. HR Dergi. (2022). Yetenek Mobilitesi ile Geleceğinize Yön Verin. https://hrdergi.com/yetenek-mobilitesi-ile-geleceginize-yon-verin
  17. Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics for study success: Reflections on current empirical findings. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 9, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00140-8
  18. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22280.24321
  19. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
  20. Kocabıyık, O. (2016). Olgubilim ve gömülü kuram: Bazı özellikler açısından karşılaştırma. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 55-66.
  21. Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485-500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021452
  22. Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. University Press of America.
  23. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  24. LinkedIn Learning. (2019). 2019 Workplace Learning Report. https://learning.linkedin.com/resources/workplace-learning-report
  25. London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199921)38:1
  26. Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee Training And Development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  27. Panagiotopoulos, P., Karanasios, S., & Burgess, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in workplace learning and development: Conceptualizing affordances and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107502
  28. Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
  29. Recruiters Lineup. (2023). What Is Career Mobility and Why Is It Important? https://www.recruiterslineup.com/what-is-career-mobility-why-it-is-important/
  30. Schein, E. H. (1996). Career anchors revisited: Implications for career development in the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(4), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1996.3145321
  31. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30-40.
  32. Sullivan, S. E., & Arthur, M. B. (2006). The evolution of the boundaryless career concept: Examining physical and psychological mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.001
  33. Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1542-1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350082
  34. Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Duane Brown & L. Linda Brooks (Eds.), Career Choice And Development (2nd ed., pp. 197–261). Jossey-Bass.
  35. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (10. bs.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  36. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0