Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of symmetric and asymmetric surgery for infantile Esotropia

İnfantil ezotropyada simetrik ve asimetrik cerrahinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
15–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In terms of surgical success for ortotropia, there was no difference between unilateral resection and recession in one-eye and bimedial recessions in both eyes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical success rates of asymmetric (recession and resection) and symmetric (bimedial recession) surgery in infantile esotropia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The consecutive case series of infantile esotropic patients operated with resection and recession in one eye (Group I) and recessions of medial rectus muscles of both eyes (Group II) were compared for the surgical success, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In terms of surgical success for ortotropia, there was no difference between unilateral resection and recession in one-eye and bimedial recessions in both eyes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Oftalmolojik cerrahi işlemler · Ezotropi · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical success rates of asymmetric (recession and resection) and symmetric (bimedial recession) surgery in infantile esotropia. Material and Method: The consecutive case series of infantile esotropic patients operated with resection and recession in one eye (Group I) and recessions of medial rectus muscles of both eyes (Group II) were compared for the surgical success, retrospectively. Sixty nine patients were operated for infantile esotropia between 1991 and 2003 and followed up at least for the first 3 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups to describe the purpose of different surgical methods. Surgical success was defined as postoperative ±10 PD in Krimsky and ±50 in Hirshberg tests. Results: The surgical success rate of asymmetric surgery was 94% (30/32) and symmetric surgery was 90% (33/37). The statistical difference between success rates was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: In terms of surgical success for ortotropia, there was no difference between unilateral resection and recession in one-eye and bimedial recessions in both eyes.

Özet

Amaç: İnfantil ezotropyada asimetrik ve simetrik cerrahi yöntemlerin başarı oranlarını değerlendirmek amacı ile yapılan bu çalışmada, tek gözde (asimetrik) geriletme ve rezeksiyon yapılmış olan infantil ezotropyalı olgularla (Grup I), iki gözde (simetrik) medial rektuslara geriletme yapılmış olan olgular (Grup II) cerrahi başarı açısından retrospektif olarak karşılaştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: 1991–2003 yılları arasında 69 olgu infantil ezotropya nedeniyle opere edilmiş ve postoperatif en az üç ay takip edilmiş- tir. Hastalar değişik cerrahi metodların amacını tanımlamak için iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Cerrahi başarı postoperatif Krimsky testinde ± 10 prizm dioptri, Hirshberg testinde ± 50 olarak tanımlanmıştır. Bulgular: Cerrahi başarı oranı asimetrik cerrahide %94 (30/32) ve asimetrik cerrahide %90 (33/37) idi. İstatistiksel olarak başarı oranları arası nda anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Sonuç: Ortotropya için cerrahi başarı açısından, tek gözde geriletme-rezeksiyon ve çift gözde bimedial geriletme arasında fark bulunamadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBAĞCI, İ., GÜNGÖR, K., BEKİR, N. A. (2006). Comparison of symmetric and asymmetric surgery for infantile Esotropia. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 15–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/133137

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nixon RB, Helveston EM, Miller K, Archer SM, Ellis FD. Incidence of strabismus in neonates. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100: 798-801
  2. Wright KW (Ed). Color atlas of strabismus surgery strategies and techniques. 2nd edition, California: J.P. Lippincott Company, 2000: s.2-18
  3. Von Norden GK, Campo EC (Editors). Clinical characteristics of neuromuscular anomalies of the eye. In: Binocular vision and ocular motility. 6th ed., Missouri: Moshby, 2002: s. 320-336
  4. Ansons AM, Davis H (Editors). Infantile strabismus. In: Diagnosis and management of ocular motility disorders. 3rd ed., Manchester:Blackwell Science, 2001: 286-293
  5. Wright KW (Ed). Color atlas of strabismus surgery strategies and techniques. 2nd edition, California: J.P. Lippincott Company, 2000:249-250
  6. Tran HM, Mims JL 3rd, Wood RC. A new dose-response curve for bilateral medial rectus recessions for infantile esotropia. J AAPOS 2002; 6: 112-119
  7. Happe W, Suleiman Y. Early and late occurring consecutive exotropia following a medial rectus faden operation.Ophthalmologe 1999; 96: 509-512
  8. Shirabe H, Mori Y, Dogru M, Yamamoto M. Early surgery for infantile esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 536-538
  9. Ing MR, Rezentes K. Outcome study of the development of fusion in patients aligned for congenital esotropia in relation to duration of misalignment. J AAPOS 2004; 8: 35-37
  10. Autrata R, Hromadkova L, Rehurek J. Effect of early surgery in essential infantile esotropia on the quality of binocular vision. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2002; 58: 36-41
  11. Altıntaş AK, Yilmaz GF, Duman S. Results of classical and augmented bimedial rectus recession in infantile esotropia. Strabismus 1999; 7: 227-236
  12. Rowe FJ. Long-term postoperative stability in infantile esotropia. Strabismus 2000; 8: 3-13
  13. Holman RE, Merritt JC. Infantile esotropia; results in the neurologic impaired and normal child at NCMH (6 years). J Pediat Ophthalmol Strabismus 1986; 23: 41-45.