Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Is success objective or subjective in knee prosthesis?

Diz protezinde başarı objektif mi? Subjektif mi?

Pages
132–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Although radiological and functional results are not so good, application of the knee prosthesis decreases the patients’ pain and increases the patients’ satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To analyze the relation between the radiological and functional results and satisfaction of the knee prosthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this study, knee prosthesis applied to 43 patients’ 76 knees were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Although radiological and functional results are not so good, application of the knee prosthesis decreases the patients’ pain and increases the patients’ satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedavi sonucu · Geriyedönük çalışma · Diz protezi

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the relation between the radiological and functional results and satisfaction of the knee prosthesis. Material and Methods: In this study, knee prosthesis applied to 43 patients’ 76 knees were retrospectively evaluated. As a radiologic parameter; anatomical alignment, and as a functional measurement; range of motion was evaluated. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as a pain score. The relation of functional and radiological measurements with VAS scores was analyzed. All the patients were re-evaluated with Oxford knee score. Results: Study group included 37 women and 6 men with a mean age of 63 (26-76). A total number of 76 knees (33 bilateral, 10 unilateral) were evaluated. Mean follow up time was 16.25 months (2-29 months). In the last evaluation; according to the preoperative evaluation, varus deformity improved, functional improvement could not be gained and VAS decreased, in 23 knees. In 21 knees, no radiological and functional improvement could be gained, VAS decreased. In 13 knees, no radiological difference was obtained, functions got worse, VAS decreased. In 3 knees, no radiological difference was obtained, functions were better, VAS decreased. Three knees were radiologically worse, without any change in functions, VAS decreased. In 2 knees, radiological and functional results improved, VAS decreased. In 2 knees, although there was postoperative infection, VAS decreased. In only 3 knees, radiological and functional results were worse and VAS score did not change. Mean Oxford knee score was 9.7. Conclusions: Although radiological and functional results are not so good, application of the knee prosthesis decreases the patients’ pain and increases the patients’ satisfaction.

Özet

Amaç: Diz protezi uygulanan hastaların radyolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçları ile hasta memnuniyet oranları arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Diz protezi uygulanan 43 hastanın 76 dizi geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Radyolojik olarak anatomik dizilim, fonksiyonel olarak hareket açıklıkları ölçüldü. Vizüel analog skalası (VAS) değerleri ile ağrı ölçümü yapıldı. VAS skorları ameliyat olan her diz için ayrı ayrı sorgulandı. Bu ağrı değerinin, fonksiyonel ve radyolojik ölçümlerle ilişkisi araştırıldı. Hastalar Oxford diz skoru ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışma grubu 37 kadın, 6 erkek; ortalama yaş 63 (26-76) olan hastaların 33 iki taraflı, 10 tek taraflı toplam 76 dizi değerlendirilerek oluşturuldu. Ortalama takip süresi 16.25 ay (2-29 ay) idi. Son değerlendirmede, ameliyat öncesi değerlendirmeye göre 23 dizde radyolojik varus deformitesi düzelmiş, belirgin fonksiyonel düzelme olmamış, VAS skoru azalmıştır. Yirmi bir dizde radyolojik ve fonksiyonel düzelme olmadan VAS azalmıştı. Onüç dizde radyolojik görüntü değişmemiş, fonksiyonlar kötüleşmiş fakat VAS azalmıştı. Altı dizde radyolojik iyileşme görülürken, fonksiyonlar kötüleşmiş, VAS azalmıştı. Üç dizde radyolojik değişme olmamış, fonksiyonlar iyileşmiş, VAS azalmıştı. Üç dizde radyolojik kötüleşme olmuş, fonksiyonlar değişmemiş, VAS azalmıştı. İki dizde radyoloji ve fonksiyon iyileşmiş, VAS azalmıştı. İki dizde ameliyat sonrası dönemde enfeksiyon görüldüğü halde VAS azalmıştı. Sadece radyolojik ve fonksiyonel olarak kötüleşme olan 3 dizde VAS değerleri değişmemişti. Ortalama Oxford diz skoru 9.7 bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar: Radyolojik ve fonksiyonel olarak istenen düzeyde sonuç alınmasa da, uygulanan diz protezi hastanın ağrısını azaltmakta, hasta memnuniyetini arttırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOPUROĞLU, C., ÖZCAN, M., AYKAÇ, B., YILMAZ, B., YALNIZ, E. (2009). Is success objective or subjective in knee prosthesis?. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 132–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/132949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Crockarell JR, Guyton JL. Arthroplasty of the knee. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (Eds). Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 11th edition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Mosby; 2008.p.241-311
  2. Dorr LD, Chao L. The emotional state of the patient after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463: 7-12
  3. Sjöling M, Nordahl G, Olofsson N, Asplund K. The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 169-176
  4. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1273-1279
  5. Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, et al. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 100-109
  6. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ, National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 893-900
  7. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 262-267
  8. Gandhi R, de beer J, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M. Does patient perception of alignment affect total knee arthroplasty outcome? Can J Surg 2007; 50: 181-186
  9. Padua R, Ceccarelli E, Bondi R, Campi A, Padua L. Range of motion correlates with patient perception of TKA outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 460: 174-177
  10. Lenssen AF, Crijns YH, Waltje EM, et al. Efficiency of immediate postoperative inpatient physical therapy following total knee arthroplasty: an RCT. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2006; 7: 71
  11. Grissom SP, Dunagan L. Improved satisfaction during inpatient rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 798-803
  12. Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 286-294
  13. Mont MA, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Gordon N, Hungerford DS, Jones LC. Knee arthroplasties have similar results in high- and low-activity patients. Clin Orthop relat Res 2007; 460: 165-173
  14. Baumann C, Rat AC, Osnowycz G, Mainard D, Delagoutte JP,