SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

A RULE-BASED APPROACH TO SOFA DESIGN WITH KANSEI ENGINEERING

Mithat ZEYDAN
Abdurrahman ÖCAL
Pages
69–89
Publication Date
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:design · rough set · product development

Abstract

Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past. Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost. In order to stay competitive in the market, a well-designed product should be able to not only meet functionality requirements, but also satisfy consumers’ psychological needs (or feelings). In this study, a rough set based kansei engineering decision support system was developed using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) and PLS (Partial Least Square) approximations. Decision rules for 16 design samples were generated by orthogonal design. Twelve selected samples were tested whether the decision of customers were true or not related with the sample products in terms of taste of customers. We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

Özet

Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past. Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost. In order to stay competitive in the market, a well-designed product should be able to not only meet functionality requirements, but also satisfy consumers’ psychological needs (or feelings). In this study, a rough set based kansei engineering decision support system was developed using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) and PLS (Partial Least Square) approximations. Decision rules for 16 design samples were generated by orthogonal design. Twelve selected samples were tested whether the decision of customers were true or not related with the sample products in terms of taste of customers. We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYDAN, M., ÖCAL, A. (2021). A RULE-BASED APPROACH TO SOFA DESIGN WITH KANSEI ENGINEERING. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 69–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/132768

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alemi-Ardakani, M., Milani, A.S., Yannacopoulos, S., Shokouhi, G. (2016). On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites. Expert SystemsWithApplications. 46, 426-438.
  2. Bergman, B., Klefsjö, B. (1990). Statistical Engineering for quality and productivity improvements. European Journal of Engineering Education. 15(3), 257-266.
  3. Camo Analytics, PLS regression, http://www.camo.com/resources/pls-regression.html (accessed 15 March 2020).
  4. Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Theory and Methodology: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95, 649-655.
  5. Chiu, M.-C., Chen, Y.-W. (2018). The analysis of incomplete dataset using fuzzy c-medoids algorithm with a case study of physical examination dataset. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice (IJIETAP). 25(1), 67-76.
  6. Guo, J.-Y., Chankong, V. (2002). Rough set-based approach to rule generation and rule induction. International Journal of General Systems. 31 (6), 601-617.
  7. Lin, C., Liu, C., Chen, H., Lin, C. Y., Chang, C. (2013). Consumer preference and image perceptions to classic chairs. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research. 59 (22), 105-109.
  8. Ma, M.-Y., Chen, C.-Y., Wu, F.-G. (2007). A design decision-making support model for customized product color combination. Comput. Ind. 58, 504–518. Memurlar, https://www.memurlar.net/haber/800103/mobilya-satislarinda-yuzde-30-artis-bekleniyor.html/ (accessed 15 March 2020). Minitab18 support, PLS regression, https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/modeling-statistics/regression/supporting-topics/partial-least-squares-regression/what-is-partial-least-squares-regression/ (accessed 15 March 2020).
  9. Nagamachi, M. (2011). Kansei/Affective Engineering. F: CRC Press. 31-225.
  10. Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of industrial ergonomics. 15, 3-11.
  11. Nagamachi, M. (1997). Kansei engineering and comfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 19, 79-80.
  12. Nagamachi, M. (2006). Kansei engineering and Rough sets model. RSCTC, LNAI, 4259, Springer. 27-37.
  13. Nagamachi, M., Okazaki, Y., Ishikawa, M. (2006). Kansei engineering and application of the Rough sets model. In Proceedings of IMechE. 220, 763–768.
  14. Nishino T. (2005). “Rough sets and Kansei”, in Nagamachi, M