KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

A RULE-BASED APPROACH TO SOFA DESIGN WITH KANSEI ENGINEERING

Mithat ZEYDAN
Abdurrahman ÖCAL
Sayfa
69–89
Yayın Tarihi
2021-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:design · rough set · product development

Özet

Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past. Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost. In order to stay competitive in the market, a well-designed product should be able to not only meet functionality requirements, but also satisfy consumers’ psychological needs (or feelings). In this study, a rough set based kansei engineering decision support system was developed using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) and PLS (Partial Least Square) approximations. Decision rules for 16 design samples were generated by orthogonal design. Twelve selected samples were tested whether the decision of customers were true or not related with the sample products in terms of taste of customers. We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

Abstract

Today, product design has been much more complicated when compared with the past. Shorter product life cycle increased product development cost. In order to stay competitive in the market, a well-designed product should be able to not only meet functionality requirements, but also satisfy consumers’ psychological needs (or feelings). In this study, a rough set based kansei engineering decision support system was developed using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchical Process) and PLS (Partial Least Square) approximations. Decision rules for 16 design samples were generated by orthogonal design. Twelve selected samples were tested whether the decision of customers were true or not related with the sample products in terms of taste of customers. We find that qualitative evaluations for product design in kansei engineering are more consistent with the results of consumers rather than quantitative evaluations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZEYDAN, M., ÖCAL, A. (2021). A RULE-BASED APPROACH TO SOFA DESIGN WITH KANSEI ENGINEERING. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 69–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/132768

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Alemi-Ardakani, M., Milani, A.S., Yannacopoulos, S., Shokouhi, G. (2016). On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites. Expert SystemsWithApplications. 46, 426-438.
  2. Bergman, B., Klefsjö, B. (1990). Statistical Engineering for quality and productivity improvements. European Journal of Engineering Education. 15(3), 257-266.
  3. Camo Analytics, PLS regression, http://www.camo.com/resources/pls-regression.html (accessed 15 March 2020).
  4. Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Theory and Methodology: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 95, 649-655.
  5. Chiu, M.-C., Chen, Y.-W. (2018). The analysis of incomplete dataset using fuzzy c-medoids algorithm with a case study of physical examination dataset. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice (IJIETAP). 25(1), 67-76.
  6. Guo, J.-Y., Chankong, V. (2002). Rough set-based approach to rule generation and rule induction. International Journal of General Systems. 31 (6), 601-617.
  7. Lin, C., Liu, C., Chen, H., Lin, C. Y., Chang, C. (2013). Consumer preference and image perceptions to classic chairs. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research. 59 (22), 105-109.
  8. Ma, M.-Y., Chen, C.-Y., Wu, F.-G. (2007). A design decision-making support model for customized product color combination. Comput. Ind. 58, 504–518. Memurlar, https://www.memurlar.net/haber/800103/mobilya-satislarinda-yuzde-30-artis-bekleniyor.html/ (accessed 15 March 2020). Minitab18 support, PLS regression, https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/modeling-statistics/regression/supporting-topics/partial-least-squares-regression/what-is-partial-least-squares-regression/ (accessed 15 March 2020).
  9. Nagamachi, M. (2011). Kansei/Affective Engineering. F: CRC Press. 31-225.
  10. Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of industrial ergonomics. 15, 3-11.
  11. Nagamachi, M. (1997). Kansei engineering and comfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 19, 79-80.
  12. Nagamachi, M. (2006). Kansei engineering and Rough sets model. RSCTC, LNAI, 4259, Springer. 27-37.
  13. Nagamachi, M., Okazaki, Y., Ishikawa, M. (2006). Kansei engineering and application of the Rough sets model. In Proceedings of IMechE. 220, 763–768.
  14. Nishino T. (2005). “Rough sets and Kansei”, in Nagamachi, M